green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Jacobson v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
See United States v. Mouzin, 785 F.2d 682, 695 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied sub nom., Carvajal v. United States, 479 U.S. 985 , 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Jacobson v. Hughes Aircraft Company
See United States v. Mouzin, 785 F.2d 682, 695 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied sub nom., Carvajal v. United States, 479 U.S. 985 , 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John T. Stone, Jr. Roy A. Wujkowski
We turn next to Wujkowski’s beach house records, which the district court, having conducted its in camera review, described as “statements of the rental agent, bills for public utilities, the telephone company, and the power company.” We agree with the district court’s conclusion that although the documents are personal, they are unprotected by the privilege against self-incrimination because their existence, possession, and authentication are a “foregone conclusion”; their production “adds little or nothing to the sum total of the Government’s information.” Fisher v. United …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher
See United States v. Mouzin, 785 F.2d 682, 692-93 (9th Cir.) (knowledge of the identity of the declarant is essential to establish foundation for admissibility of evidence under rule 801(d)(2)(E)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 985 , 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher
See United States v. Mouzin, 785 F.2d 682, 692-93 (9th Cir.) (knowledge of the identity of the declarant is essential to establish foundation for admissibility of evidence under rule 801(d)(2)(E)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 985 , 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hallsims Industrial Components
Accord, United States v. Lang, 792 F.2d 1235 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 578 (1986). [Even where] a corporation’s custodian of records would incriminate himself if he were to act to produce the company’s records, this still does not relieve the corporation of its continuing obligation to produce the subpoenaed documents.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Sealed Case
See United States v. Lang, 792 F.2d 1235, 1240-41 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 578 (1986); In re Two Grand Jury Subpoenae Duces Tecum, 769 F.2d 52, 57 (2d Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Donna Crooks and Brenda Holmes v. Honorable John H. Maynard
See McMillan v. Svetanoff, 793 F.2d 149 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986); Laskowski v. Mears, 600 F.Supp. 1568 (N.D.Ind.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David J. Payne
See also, United States v. Mouzin, 785 F.2d 682, 693 (9th Cir.) (applying harmless error analysis to an error found to be reviewable as a plain error), cert. denied sub nom Carvajal v. United States, 479 U.S. 985 , 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986); United States v. Plascencia-Orozco, 768 F.2d 1074 , 1076 n. 7 (9th Cir.1985) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Novak
See, e.g., People v. Medler, 177 Cal.App.3d 927, 930 , 223 Cal.Rptr. 401, 402 (1986); Johnson v. State, 225 Kan. 458 , 590 P.2d 1082, 1086-87 (1979) (cited in Solina); Hill v. State, 393 S.W.2d 901, 904 (Tex.Crim.App.1965); see also United States v. Mouzin, 785 F.2d 682, 694-99 (9th Cir.) (where federal appeals court had suspended attorney from practice in that court for procedural defaults and kiting a check to court reporter in unrelated case, district court was not required automatically to suspend him immediately from practice in district court but rather had discretion to permit him to co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury 89-4 Subpoena Duces Tecum
But, at this point, the analysis becomes more complicated because the act of production may have "communicative aspects of its own, wholly aside from the contents of the papers produced." Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 , 96 S.Ct. 1569, 1581 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976); see also United States v. Lang, 792 F.2d 1235, 1240 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 985 , 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 578 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Doe
But, at this point, the analysis becomes more complicated because the act of production may have “communicative aspects of its own, wholly aside from the contents of the papers produced.” Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 , 96 S.Ct. 1569, 1581 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976); see also United States v. Lang, 792 F.2d 1235, 1240 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 985 , 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 578 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert A. Hawley, United States of America v. Audrey J. Hawley
See also United States v. Mouzin, 785 F.2d 682, 688-90 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 985 , 107 S.Ct. 574 , 93 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986) (defendant who gave cash to undercover agent to deposit in commercial bank without CTRs being filed acted as a “financial institution”); Goldberg, 756 F.2d at 953-57 (defendant who accepted cash from undercover agent for “laundering” through a commercial bank acted as a “financial institution”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roger Dean Pack
See also United States v. Mouzin, 785 F.2d 682, 697-99 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 107 S.Ct. 574 (1986) 2 We express no opinion as to the validity of the process by which defendant was charged and his sentence was enhanced pursuant to the dangerous special offender statute, because this issue was never raised or briefed by the parties.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Church of St. Paul and St. Andrew
v.
Barwick
v.
Barwick
No. 86-397.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1986.
Published
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.