green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Roma Construction Company and Peter Zanni v. Ralph R. Arusso
(2×)
See Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Warren v. Manufacturers Nat’l Bank of Detroit, 759 F.2d 542, 545 (6th Cir.1985); Abrams, supra, § 3.3.6, at 147-52.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lester v. Brown
Columbans, 861 F.2d 761, 764 (1st Cir.1988); see Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Nat’l Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 645 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Ruple v. City of Vermillion, 714 F.2d 860, 862 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1029 , 104 S.Ct. 1290 , 79 L.Ed.2d 692 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Ann Carter RENNIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DALTON, Secretary of the Navy,* Defendant-Appellee
See Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Nat’l Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 650 (7th Cir.) (“[a]n appeal is frivolous where the result is obvious or when the appellant’s argument is wholly without merit”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); see also Smith v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 959 F.2d 655 , 661 (7th Cir.1992) (“[sanctions are appropriate if the appeal was prosecuted with no reasonable expectation of altering the district court’s judgment and for purposes of delay or harassment or sheer obstinacy”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pompano-Windy City Partners, Ltd. v. Bear Stearns & Co.
Rather, the fraud must have been integral to the plaintiff’s purchase or sale of the security.” Flickinger, supra, 947 F.2d at 598 (quoting Pross v. Katz, 784 F.2d 455, 459 (2d Cir.1986)) (citations omitted); accord Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 847 (2d Cir.) (“To fall within Section 10(b), misrepresentations must have some direct pertinence to a securities transaction.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); see also Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores, 421 U.S. 723, 731-749 , 95 S.Ct. 1917, 1923-32 , 44 L.Ed.2d 539 (1975) (requiring s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Windsor Shirt Co. v. New Jersey National Bank
See In re Sunrise Securities Litigation, 916 F.2d 874 , 886 (3d Cir.1990) (“decreases in share value reflect decreases in the value of the company”), citing Rand v. Araconda-Ericcson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843 , 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Gaff v. FDIC, 828 F.2d 1145, 1150 (6th Cir.1987) (“diminution in the value of corporate stock constitutes a direct injury to the corporation”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Illinois Hospital Ass'n v. Edgar
See Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank, 790 F.2d 638, 646 (7th Cir.1986), *1348 cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986) (to the extent that the second suit alleges facts occurring after the filing of the first suit, the second suit is not barred by res judicata). a.Count I Count I challenges the non-ICARE rate setting methodology.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sound Video Unlimited, Inc. v. Video Shack Inc.
See Rand v. Anaconda-Ericcson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843 , 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 582 (1986); Warren v. Manufacturers Nat’l Bank, 759 F.2d 542, 544 (6th Cir.1985); Nordberg v. Lord, Day & Lord, 107 F.R.D. 692, 699 (S.D.N.Y.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
WAIT RADIO BY ROSENFIELD v. Price Waterhouse
See Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank, 790 F.2d 638, 650 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
C & W Construction Co. v. Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 745
See Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 623 F.Supp. 176, 182 (E.D.N.Y.1985), affirmed, 794 F.2d 843 , 849 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Sellers v. General Motors Corp., 590 F.Supp. 502, 507 (E.D.Pa.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Interpictures, Inc.
Green v. Victor Talking Machine Co., 24 F.2d 378 (2d Cir.1928), cert. denied 278 U.S. 602 , 49 S.Ct. 9 , 73 L.Ed. 530 (1928); Accord, Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.1986) cert. denied — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 ; Vincel v. White Motor Corp., 521 F.2d 1113 (2d Cir.1975) (where the court found plaintiff-stockholder to lack standing to bring an action in his own right for anti-trust violations causing corporate injury); Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, P.C. v. Martindale-Hubbell, Inc., 521 F.Supp. 1046 (S.D.N.Y.1981), aff'd, 710 F.2d 87 (2d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cristiano v. Courts of the Justices of the Peace
In the analogous area of nonresident service of process, the Supreme Court held in Wuchter v. Pizzutti that procedures not mandated by the statute cannot “supply constitutional validity to the statute or to service under it.” 276 U.S. 13, 24 , 48 S.Ct. 259, 262 , 72 L.Ed. 446 (1928); see Sterling v. Environmental Control Board, 793 F.2d 52 , 58 n. 4 (2d Cir.1976) (“extrastatuto-ry measures cannot render valid a statute unconstitutional on its face,” citing Wuchter, 276 U.S. at 24 , 48 S.Ct. at 262 ), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed. 582 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Coronet Insurance v. Seyfarth
See Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
A Pocono Country Place, Inc. v. Peterson
See Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
District No. 8, International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Clearing
See Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Nat'l Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 650-51 (7th Cir.1986), petition for cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor of Baltimore, 775 F.2d 177, 184 (7th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick Ryan and William Schwener
“The three threshold requirements of res judicata are: (1) an identity of the parties or their privies; (2) an identity of the causes of action, and (3) a final judgment on the merits.” Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 789 F.2d 589 , 595 n. 9 (7th Cir.1986); see Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Nat’l Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 645 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. Bowen
See Sterling v. Environmental Control Board, 793 F.2d 52 , 58 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986) (it is within the discretion of the trial judge to deny class certification “three and a half years after commencement of lawsuit, after a full trial, and after two extensive rounds of hearings before a magistrate”); Marquez v. Kiley, 436 F.Supp. 100 , 109 n. 9 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (Lasker, J.) (party may move for class certification “even after trial on the merits”) (citing cases). 7 Whether or not the Second Circuit would invalidate a departure from the…
discussed
Cited "see"
District No. 8, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Clearing, Division of U.S. Industries, Inc.
See Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Nat’l Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 650-51 (7th Cir. 1986), petition for cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor of Baltimore, 775 F.2d 177, 184 (7th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strougo ex rel. Brazilian Equity Fund, Inc. v. Bassini
See Audio Odyssey, Ltd. v. Brenton First Nat’l Bank, 245 F.3d 721 , 729 (8th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 245 F.3d 721 (8th Cir.2001) (in banc); see also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) ("[Djiminution in value of the corporate assets is insufficient direct harm to give the shareholder standing to sue in his own right.”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strougo v. Bassini
Id. at 359-60, 369 . 4 "Shareholder standing" is a term used to describe the ability of a shareholder to seek redress for certain injuries on his or her own behalf rather than on behalf of the corporation See Audio Odyssey, Ltd. v. Brenton First Nat'l Bank, 245 F.3d 721 , 729 (8th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 245 F.3d 721 (8th Cir.2001) (in banc); see also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) ("[D]iminution in value of the corporate assets is insufficient direct harm to give the shareholder standing to sue in his own right.") (citation and internal quotation marks o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ownby v. Cohen
See Frank v. D'Ambrosi, 4 F.3d at 1385; see also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.1986). (diminution in value of corporate asset is insufficient direct harm to give a shareholder standing to sue under RICO), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986). 7 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
T & T GEOTECHNICAL, INC. v. Union Pacific Resources Co.
See, e.g., Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Midwestern Waffles, 734 F.2d at 710-11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J.S. Service Center Corp. v. General Electric Technical Services Co.
See also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) (Shareholders of corporation lack standing to assert RICO claim against corporation’s creditors on behalf of corporation.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. *224 987, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lazaros v. City of West Haven
See Christ-Janer v. A. F. Conte & Co., 8 Conn. App. 83, 88 , 511 A.2d 1017 (1986); see also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S. Ct. 579 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lehman's Inc. of Anderson v. Hittle (In Re Hittle)
In re Wien, 155 B.R. 479, 487 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1993); see also Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Nat’l Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 645 (7th Cir.1986) (finding a judgment on motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim was a final judgment on the merits for res judicata purposes), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Piazza v. Major League Baseball
See also, e.g., Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.
Compare Food Service, Inc., 129 F.R.D. at 129 (“personal interest”) with Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank, 609 F.Supp. 1083 (N.D.Ill.1985) (“principals”), affd, 790 F.2d 638 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Standardbred Owners Association v. Roosevelt Raceway Associates, L.P.
This rule is intended to preclude recovery by plaintiffs who "complain[ ] of harm flowing merely from the misfortunes visited upon a third person," Holmes, supra, --- U.S. at ----, 112 S.Ct. at 1318 ; see, e.g., Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) (corporate shareholders or creditors suing for injuries to the corporation), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986). 7 Plaintiffs in the instant case are not making a claim that is derivative of injury, if any, sustained by the IDA.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Standardbred Owners Ass'n v. Roosevelt Raceway Associates, L.P.
This rule is intended to preclude recovery by plaintiffs who “complain[] of harm flowing merely from the misfortunes visited upon a third person,” Holmes, supra, — U.S. at -, 112 S.Ct. at 1318 ; see, e.g., Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) (corporate shareholders or creditors suing for injuries to the corporation), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thornton v. Butler
See also Sterling v. Environmental Control Board of the City of New York, 793 F.2d 52, 56 (2d Cir.) ("Notices posted on exterior doors of urban multiple residences may well disappear quickly due to forces human or natural”), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986). 28 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minpeco, S.A. v. Hunt
See also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) (affirming dismissal of RICO claim where injury was derivative), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Warren v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, 759 F.2d 542, 544-45 (6th Cir.1985) (holding that defendant’s fraud was directed at company as corporate entity, not toward plaintiff as its employee and thus plaintiff’s loss of employment was merely incidental to corporation’s injury and not an injury sustained “by reason of” defendant’s fraudulent conduct).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernard Beam v. Ipco Corporation, D/B/A Sterling Optical
See also Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 650-51 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eileen Bass v. Louis Campagnone
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1552, at 689-90 (1971) (Union may be “the real party in interest for purposes of enforcing any right it has as an entity.”) (footnote omitted); see also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.) (holding that the corporation, rather than certain of its shareholders, was the real party in interest in a RICO suit against defendants who allegedly harmed the corporation by engaging in various illegal activities), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bankers Trust Co. v. Feldesman
See, e.g., Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843 (2d Cir.), certdenied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Warren v. Manufacturers National Bank, 759 F.2d 542 (6th Cir.1985); Carter v. Berger, 777 F.2d 1173 (7th Cir.1985); Nordberg v. Lord, Day & Lord, 107 F.R.D. 692 (S.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
H.G. Gallimore, Inc. v. Abdula
See, e.g., Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank, 790 F.2d 638, 649 (7th Cir.) (mailings that made it more likely that the alleged scheme would be uncovered could not constitute mail fraud because they were not in furtherance of the scheme), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); United States v. *447 Staszcuk, 502 F.2d 875, 881 (7th Cir.1974) (rejecting as irrelevant the government’s argument that but for the fraudulent scheme there would have been no mailings), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975); Evanston Bank v. ContiCommodity…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Environmental Control Board of the City of New York
v.
Sterling
v.
Sterling
No. 86-600.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1986.
Cited by 159 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.