green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…once the bankruptcy petition has been filed, property rights belonging to the debtor under state law become assets of the estate.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wagner v. Key Bank of Alaska
(2×)
once the bankruptcy petition has been filed, property rights belonging to the debtor under state law become assets of the estate.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rishikof v. Mortada
See Moran v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 27 F.3d 169, 173 (5th Cir.1994) (citing Joseph v. Office of Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018 , 1025 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988)) (noting that the tortious activity exception to the' FSIA “requires a finding that the doctrine of respondent superior applies to the tortious act [ ] committed by the employee of the foreign state”).
cited
Cited "see"
Baldi v. Lynch (In Re McCook Metals, L.L.C.)
See Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339 , 1343, 1348 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderman v. Federal Republic of Austria
See Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.1987) (quoting Frolova, 761 F.2d at 377 ), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988); H.R.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Goodman v. Phoenix Container, Inc. (In Re DeMert & Dougherty, Inc.)
See Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339, 1343 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988) (“rights of action against officers, directors and shareholders of a corporation for breaches of fiduciary duties, which can be enforced by either the corporation directly or the shareholders derivatively before bankruptcy, become property of the estate which the trustee alone has the right to pursue after the filing of a bankruptcy petition”); Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Toy King Distributors, Inc. v. Liberty Sa…
discussed
Cited "see"
Logan v. Dupuis
See Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria 830 F.2d 1018 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (FSIA governs landlord-tenant dispute where premises leased on behalf of foreign consulate; immunity of consular officer is determined by Vienna Convention on Consular Relations). 3 .See August 7, 1997 Letter from Mary Catherine Malin, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, docket no. 10-1 ("We understand that neither the government of Canada nor Mr. Du-puis intend tó take action with respect to [the] above referenced case____”) 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Aetna Bank v. Dvorak
See Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339, 1350-51 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Keene Corp. v. Coleman (In Re Keene Corp.)
Id. at 701 ; accord Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339, 1348-49 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chuidian v. Philippine National Bank
See Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.1987) (implicit waiver may be found where “a foreign state has filed a responsive pleading in a case without raising the defense of sovereign immunity.”) (internal quotation omitted), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vincente B. Chuidian v. Philippine National Bank, and Raul Daza, Vincente B. Chuidian, and Philippine Export and Foreign Loan Guarantee Corporation, Intervenor v. Philippine National Bank, and Raul Daza
See Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.1987) (implicit waiver may be found where "a foreign state has filed a responsive pleading in a case without raising the defense of sovereign immunity.") (internal quotation omitted), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988). 55 We see no need to decide whether the Bank and the Guarantee Corporation have in fact waived sovereign immunity.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ranger Insurance v. Home Indemnity Co.
See generally Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center, 117 Ill.2d 507 , 111 Ill.Dec. 944 , 953-54, 513 N.E.2d 387, 396-97 (1987), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988); Phillips v. J.F.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re John Paul White, Debtor, John Paul White v. Patricia Ann White
See Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, 831 F.2d 1339 , 1342 n. 3 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sofia Design & Development at South Brunswick, LLC v. D'Amore (In re D'Amore)
See 335 B.R. at 620 ; see also In re Transcolor Corp., 296 B.R. 343, 361 (Bankr.D.Md.2003) (“Accordingly, whenever a cause of action ‘belongs’ to the debtor corporation, the trustee has the authority to pursue it in bankruptcy proceedings.” In re Ozark Restaurant Equipment Co., 816 F.2d 1222, 1224 (8th Cir.1987)); see also In re DeMert & Dougherty, Inc., 271 B.R. 821, 838 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.2001) (“Among those powers, the trustee may bring claims against the debtor’s fiduciaries.”) (citing See Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339, 1343 (7th Cir.1987), …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herzog v. Leighton Holdings, Ltd. (In Re Kids Creek Partners, L.P.)
See, e.g., Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339, 1351, n. 13 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988) (noting that the test has been adopted by many courts as the standard formulation); Unsecured Creditors’ Committee v. Banque Paribas (In re Heartland Chemicals, Inc.), 136 B.R. 503, 516 (Bankr.C.D.Ill.1992); Badger Freightways, Inc. v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Co. (In re Badger Freightways), 106 B.R. 971, 976 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1989) (Schmetterer, J.).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Daily v. Title Guaranty Escrow Service, Inc.
See, e.g., Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, 831 F.2d 1339 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Braas Systems, Inc. v. WMR Partners (In Re Octagon Roofing)
See e.g., Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339 , 1351 n. 13 (7th Cir.1987) (noting that the test has been adopted by many courts as the standard formulation), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988); In re UNR Industries, Inc., 46 B.R. 25, 27-28 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack Gerritsen v. Consulado General De Mexico
Gerritsen v. de la Madrid Hurtado, 819 F.2d 1511 (9th Cir.1987); see also Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Pfauter, Ltd. v. Freeman Decorating Co.
See, e.g., Kirk v. Michael Reese Hosp. & Medical Center, 117 Ill.2d 507, 526-27 , 111 Ill.Dec. 944 , 953, 513 N.E.2d 387, 396 (1987) (citing Leon Green, Foreseeability in Negligence Law, 61 Colum.L.Rev. 1401, 1423 (1961), for the proposition that a court’s determination to limit liability must “reflect[] the policy and social requirements of the time and community”), ce rt. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Halverson v. Schuster (In Re Schuster)
See, e.g., Koch Refining v. Farmer's Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339 (7th Cir.1987), cert. den., 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Bank, N.A. v. Modansky
See, e.g., Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exch., Inc., 831 F.2d 1339 , 1343 (7th Cir.1987) (cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty becomes property of the estate which the trustee alone has the right to pursue after the filing of a bankruptcy petition), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miguel Santos v. Compagnie Nationale Air France
See Callejo v. Bancomer, S.A., 764 F.2d 1101, 1109 (5th Cir.1985) (stating that “the emphasis should be on the elements of the cause of action itself” in determining jurisdiction under the Immunities Act); Gilson v. Republic of Ireland, 682 F.2d 1022 , 1027 n. 22 (D.C.Cir.1982) (stating that jurisdiction would be present if the plaintiff could show conduct in the United States that would be “an element of the cause of action under whatever law governs his claims”); see also Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General, 830 F.2d 1018 ,1023 (,9th Cir.1987) (stating, “In determining whethe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
SOUTH BEND LATHE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellan-Cross Appellee
See, e.g., Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339, 1353 (7th Cir.1987) (finding no ripeness where the harm to the appellant is “still conjectural rather than actual”), cert. den., 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988); Matterhorn, Inc. v. NCR Corp., 727 F.2d 629, 632 (7th Cir.1984) (stating that an issue is ripe for appellate review when “ ‘it is apparent that subsequent rulings of the trial court are not going to moot the issues that the appellant would like to present’ ”), quoting University Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weltover, Inc. v. Republic of Argentina
See 748 F.2d at 797 ; see also Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1024 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988); House Report, supra, at 16, 1984 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News at 6615 ("Certainly, if an activity is customarily carried on for profit, its commercial nature could readily be assumed.”). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Badger Freightways, Inc. v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago (In Re Badger Freightways, Inc.)
See, e.g., Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339 , 1351 n. 13 (7th Cir.1987), cert. den., 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988) (noting that the test has been adopted by many courts as the standard formulation), In re UNR Industries, Inc., 46 B.R. 25, 27 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center v. Hellenic Republic
However, while “nature” and “purpose” may not be neatly separable concepts in all cases, this court has stressed that “the command of Congress embodied in 28 U.S. C. § 1603(d) requires that we confine any consideration of purpose as closely as we can, considering that purpose only so far as is absolutely necessary to define the nature of the act in question.” Segni v. Commercial Office of Spain, 835 F.2d 160, 164 (7th Cir.1987) (emphasis added); see also Joseph v. Office of Consulate Gen. of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018 , 1023 (9th Cir.1987) (while FSIA directs courts to look to nature …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center v. The Hellenic Republic
Sec. 1603 (d) requires that we confine any consideration of purpose as closely as we can, considering that purpose only so far as is absolutely necessary to define the nature of the act in question." Segni v. Commercial Office of Spain, 835 F.2d 160, 164 (7th Cir.1987) (emphasis added); see also Joseph v. Office of Consulate Gen. of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018 , 1023 (9th Cir.1987) (while FSIA directs courts to look to nature of activity rather than purpose, "the purpose of an act may be relevant in defining its nature") (emphasis original), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1077 , 99 L.Ed.2d …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KOCH REFINING COMPANY
v.
FARMERS UNION CENTRAL EXCHANGE, INC.
v.
FARMERS UNION CENTRAL EXCHANGE, INC.
No. 87-1141.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 29, 1988.
108 S. Ct. 1077
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Alaska Supreme Court (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Denied.