green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Network Appliance, Inc. v. Bluearc Corp.
Accord Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc) (noting that section 112 ¶ 6 "rules out the possibility that any and every means which performs the function specified in the claim literally satisfies that limitation”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988), and cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.
Plaintiff has not shown any “subtlety of language or complexity of the technology, nor any subsequent change in the state of the art, such as later-developed technology, [which] obfuscated the significance of this limitation at the time of its incorporation into the claim.” Sage Prods., Inc. v. Devon Indus., Inc., 126 F.3d 1420, 1425 (Fed.Cir.1997); see Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 938 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Laser Technology, Inc. v. Nikon, Inc.
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988) (overruled on other grounds).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.
Plaintiff has not shown any “subtlety of language or complexity of the technology, nor any subsequent change in the state of the art, such as later-developed technology, [which] obfuscated the significance of this limitation at the time of its incorporation into the claim.” Sage Prods., Inc. v. Devon Indus., Inc., 126 F.3d 1420, 1425 (Fed.Cir.1997); see Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 938 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Instruments Incorporated v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Lsi Logic Corporation, and Vlsi Technology, Inc.
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Way land, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739-40 (Fed.Cir.1987) (in banc), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988); 7 see also Athletic Alternatives, Inc. v. Prince Mfg., Inc., 73 F.3d 1573, 1582 , 37 USPQ2d 1365, 1373 (Fed.Cir.1996) (applying the Pennwalt rule after our in banc decision in Hilton Davis).
cited
Cited "see"
Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Victor Co. of Japan, Ltd.
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988); Dolly, 16 F.3d at 398 .
cited
Cited "see"
Davies v. United States
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Messerschmidt v. United States
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 (Fed.Cir. 1987) (“[A court] must find equivalent structure as well as identity of claimed function for that structure.”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Katz v. AIWA America, Inc.
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988) and 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739-40 (Fed.Cir.1987) (in banc), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 , cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988); Per-kin-Elmer Corp. v. Westinghouse Elec., 822 F.2d 1528, 1533 , 3 USPQ2d 1321, 1325 (Fed.Cir.1987); Lemelson v. United States, 752 F.2d 1538, 1551 , 224 USPQ 526, 533 (Fed.Cir. 1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.
See, Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988); Texas Instruments, Inc. v. I.T.C., 805 F.2d 1558, 1562 (Fed.Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Unique Concepts, Inc., and Floyd M. Baslow v. Kevin Brown D/B/A Creative Walls, Templar and Schram, and World Plastics Extruders, Inc.
(2×)
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Key Manufacturing Group, Inc. v. Microdot, Inc.
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931 , 934 n. 1, 4 USPQ2d, 1737, 1739 n. 1 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens v. Timothy McKasy D/B/A Tonka Marketing and Cbk, Ltd.
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 936 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1740-41 (Fed.Cir.1987) (equivalency of claim limitations and accused structure is a question of fact), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Zmi Corporation v. Physio-Control Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1740 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 108 S.Ct. 1226 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Black & Decker, Inc. Black & Decker (u.s.), Inc. And Cic Int'l Corp. v. Hoover Service Center, and the Hoover Company
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1740 (Fed.Cir.1987), cer t. denied, — U.S. - and -, 108 S.Ct. 1226 and 1474, 99 L.Ed.2d 426 and 703 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sun Studs, Inc. v. Ata Equipment Leasing, Inc., Applied Theory, Inc. And U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., Defendants/cross-Appellants
See generally Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931 , 4 USPQ2d 1737 (Fed.Cir.1987) (in banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 1474, 99 L.Ed.2d 426 , 703 (1988) (holding that the omission of a claimed function and its substantial equivalent avoided infringement).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.
See generally Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934-35 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988), and cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988); Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 805 F.2d 1558, 1569-70 , 231 USPQ 833, 840 (Fed.Cir.1986), reh'g denied, 846 F.2d 1369 , 6 USPQ2d 1886 (Fed.Cir.1988). 88 We conclude that the jury verdicts, viewed in light of the instructions, held that the Suzuki motorcycles with a rising rate infringed claim 9.
cited
Cited "see"
Labounty Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission, and Dudley Shearing MacHine Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Intervenor
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739 (Fed.Cir.1987) (in banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 1474, 99 L.Ed.2d 426 , 703 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.
See generally Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934-35 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988), and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988); Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States Int’l Trade Comm’n, 805 F.2d 1558, 1569-70 , 231 USPQ 833, 840 (Fed.Cir.1986), reh’g denied, 846 F.2d 1369 , 6 USPQ2d 1886 (Fed.Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739-40 (Fed.Cir.1987) (in banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 , (1988), — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Intra Corporation and Eagle Technologies, Inc. v. Hamar Laser Instruments, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739-40 (Fed.Cir.1987) (in banc), cert. denied, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 1474 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Altech Controls Corp. v. E.I.L. Instruments, Inc.
Id.; see also Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc) (“To determine whether a claim limitation is met literally, where expressed as a means for performing a stated function, the court must compare the accused structure with the disclosed structure, and must find equivalent structure as well as identity of claimed function for the structure”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Donaldson Company, Inc
D.M.I., Inc. v. Deere & Co., 755 F.2d 1570, 1575 , 225 USPQ 236, 239 (Fed.Cir.1985); see also Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 933-34 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1741 (Fed.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Judin v. United States
Becton, 922 F.2d at 798 n. 3 (quoting Union Water Meter Co. v. Desper, 101 U.S. 332, 337 , 25 L.Ed. 1024 (1880)); see also Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 949-54 (Fed.Cir.1987) (Nies, J., concurring), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 , and cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988). [A] court may not, under the guise of applying the doctrine of equivalents, erase a plethora of meaningful structural and functional limitations of the claim on which the public is entitled to rely in avoiding infringement.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Malta v. Schulmerich Carillons, Inc.
Compare Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931 , 4 USPQ2d 1737 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc ), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988) (requiring presence of every claim element, literally or by an equivalent) with Graver Tank, 339 U.S. at 607-08 , 70 S.Ct. at 855-56 , 85 USPQ at 330 (equivalency is determined of the invention as a whole).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Malta v. Schulmerich Carillons, Inc.
Compare Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931 , 4 USPQ2d 1737 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988) (requiring presence of every claim element, literally or by an equivalent) with Graver Tank, 339 U.S. at 607-08 , 70 S.Ct. at 855-56 , 85 USPQ at 330 (equivalency is determined of the invention as a whole).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Stoller v. Ford Motor Co.
See also Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 , 4 U.S.P.Q.2d 1737, 1739 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc) (stating two-part test in infringement case), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 1474, 99 L.Ed.2d 426 , 703 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deuterium Corp. v. United States
Compare Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988), with Nestier Corp. v. Menasha Corp., 739 F.2d 1576 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1756 , 84 L.Ed.2d 819 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Corning Glass Works v. Sumitomo Electric U.S.A.
Although each claim limitation may not literally be found in the accused structure, the "substantially the same way" prong of the Graver Tank test is met if an equivalent of a recited limitation has been substituted in the accused device, see Graver Tank, 339 U.S. at 610 , 70 S.Ct. at 857 ; see also Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 937 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1741 (Fed.Cir.1987) (in banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 1474, 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988); Perkin-Elmer Corp., 822 F.2d at 1533 , 3 USPQ2d at 1325; Atlas Powder Co. v. E.I.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Corning Glass Works v. Sumitomo Electric U.S.A., Inc.
Although each claim limitation may not literally be found in the accused structure, the “substantially the same way” prong of the Graver Tank test is met if an equivalent of a recited limitation has been substituted in the accused device, see Graver Tank, 339 U.S. at 610 , 70 S.Ct. at 857 ; see also Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 937 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1741 (Fed.Cir.1987) (in banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 1474, 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988); Perkin-Elmer Corp., 822 F.2d at 1533 , 3 USPQ2d at 1325; Atlas Powder Co. v. E.I.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ger-Shep, Inc.
v.
United States KLP, Inc. v. United States McMinn's Asphalt Co., Inc. v. United States McMinn's Asphalt Products, Inc. v. United States Schell v. United States and Sweigart v. United States
v.
United States KLP, Inc. v. United States McMinn's Asphalt Co., Inc. v. United States McMinn's Asphalt Products, Inc. v. United States Schell v. United States and Sweigart v. United States
No. 87-1223.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1988.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.