green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
13.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2000 ·
…search unauthorized by state law would ipso facto violate the fourth amendment.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brown v. Ely
(3×)
search unauthorized by state law would ipso facto violate the fourth amendment.
examined
Cited "see"
Wong v. Minnesota Department of Human Services
(4×)
See Bissonette v. Haig, 776 F.2d 1384, 1386 (8th Cir. 1985), aff’d, 485 U.S. 264 (1988). -2- in Wong’s county, initially denied Wong benefits but later approved some supplemental aid.
examined
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. FRITZ ARLO LOOKING CLOUD, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT
(3×)
See Bissonette v. Haig, 776 F.2d 1384, 1385 (8th Cir.1985), cert. granted, 479 U.S. 1083 , 107 S.Ct. 1283 , 94 L.Ed.2d 141 (1987), aff'd for lack of quorum under 28 U.S.C. § 2109 , 485 U.S. 264 , 108 S.Ct. 1253 , 99 L.Ed.2d 288 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Looking Cloud
See Bissonette v. Haig, 776 F.2d 1384, 1385 (8th Cir. 1985), cert. granted, 479 U.S. 1083 (1987), aff'd for lack of quorum under 28 U.S.C. § 2109 , 485 U.S. 264 (1988).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Mohamed Basher Al-Talib, United States of America v. Hector Rivera Munoz
(3×)
See Bissonette v. Haig, 776 F.2d 1384, 1390 (8th Cir.1985) (distinguishing direct military involvement in investigation from passive support), aff'd, 485 U.S. 264 , 108 S.Ct. 1253 , 99 L.Ed.2d 288 (1988).
examined
Cited "see"
Wade v. Blasingame
(3×)
See Bissonette v. Haig, 776 F.2d 1384, 1390 (8th Cir.1985), aff'd on rehearing, 800 F.2d 812 (8th Cir.1986) (en banc), aff'd for absence of quorum, 485 U.S. 264 , 108 S.Ct. 1253 , 99 L.Ed.2d 288 (1988). 4 Our review of the record convinces us the Wades failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact about the officials' knowledge of the fugitive's death.
examined
Cited "see"
Wade v. Blasingame
(3×)
See Bissonette v. Haig, 776 F.2d 1384, 1390 (8th Cir.1985), aff'd on rehearing, 800 F.2d 812 (8th Cir.1986) (en banc), aff'd for absence of quorum, 485 U.S. 264 , 108 S.Ct. 1253 , 99 L.Ed.2d 288 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruiz v. Commissioner of the Department of Transportation
See Bissonette v. Haig, 800 F.2d 812 (8th Cir.1986) (en banc) (allegation that plaintiffs were arrested by military in violation of Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1385 , made out Fourth Amendment claim, because limitations imposed by statute defined accepted notions of reasonableness), aff’d per curiam without a quorum, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 1253 , — L.Ed.2d —, 56 U.S.L.W. 3645 (U.S. March 22, 1988).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terry Lee Kummer
(6×)
We have held, too, that an arrest by a state actor that is not authorized by state law is “a seizure contrary to the Fourth Amendment.” Cole v. Nebraska, 997 F.2d 442 , 444 (8th Cir.1993); see also Bissonette v. Haig, 800 F.2d 812, 816 (8th Cir.1986) (en banc), aff'd, 485 U.S. 264 , 108 S.Ct. 1253 , 99 L.Ed.2d 288 (1988) (per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HAIG Et Al.
v.
BISSONETTE Et Al.
v.
BISSONETTE Et Al.
86-987.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1988.
Per Curiam.
Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U. S. C. § 1, and since a majority of the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is affirmed under 28 U. S. C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances the Court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided Court.
The Chief Justice, Justice O’Connor, Justice Scalia, and Justice Kennedy took no part in this decision.