green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Gaither Ex Rel. Gaither v. District of Columbia
See Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Rees, 852 F.2d 595, 599 (D.C.Cir.1988) (noting that matters that were not before the magistrate judge are not binding on the district court), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 103 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Enterprise Leasing Co. of Norfolk/Richmond v. Mepco, Inc. (In Re Mepco, Inc.)
In re Cardian Mortgage Corp., 122 B.R. 255, 258-59 , (Bankr.E.D.Va.1990); In re Crotts, 87 B.R. 418, 420 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1988); See generally, In re FCX, Inc., 853 F.2d 1149 , 1153 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 103 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Freight System, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission (In Re American Freight System, Inc.)
See In re FCX, Inc., 853 F.2d 1149 , 1153 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc., 489 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 103 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989); In re Schauer, 835 F.2d 1222 , 1225 (8th Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Tyler v. Prudoff (In Re Prudoff)
See Universal Coops., Inc. v. FCX, Inc. (In re FCX, Inc.), 858 F.2d 1149 , 1153 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 108 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. Transportation Communications International Union
See IAM v. Soo Line R.R., 850 F.2d 368 , 373 (8th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 103 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grochocinski v. Crossman (In Re Crossman)
Id. at 494 (quoting In re Schauer, 835 F.2d 1222 , 1225 (8th Cir.1987)); see also In re FCX, 853 F.2d 1149 , 1155 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 103 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Kansas Personal Communication Services, Ltd.
See also In re FCX, Inc., 853 F.2d 1149 , 1153 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc., 489 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 103 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989)(once a property interest has passed to the estate, it is subject to the same limitations imposed upon the debtor by applicable non-bankruptcy law); In re Schauer, 835 F.2d 1222 , 1225 (8th Cir.1987). 44 . § 1124(2). 45 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Delp v. Douglas
As such, “[sections] 363(b)(1) and 704 are ‘simply enabling statutes that give the trustee the authority to sell or dispose of property if the debtors would have had the same right under state law.’” Integrated Solutions, 193 B.R. at 729 (quoting In re Schauer, 835 F.2d 1222 , 1225 (8th Cir.1987)); see also In re FCX, Inc., 853 F.2d 1149 , 1155 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 103 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989) (Sections 363(b)(1) and 704 “evince no intent to enlarge the trustee’s rights to take such actions beyond the debtor’s pre-bankruptcy rights.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re CF & I Fabricators of Utah, Inc.
See, e.g., Universal Coop., Inc. v. FCX, Inc. (In re FCX, Inc.), 853 F.2d 1149 , 1156 (4th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 103 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc.
See also In re FCX, Inc., 853 F.2d 1149 , 1155 (4th Cir.1988) (“Neither § 363(b)(1), nor § 704, is an empowering statute in the sense that the new rights or powers for dealing with the property of the estate are created.... [They] evince[] no intent to enlarge the trustee’s rights to take such actions beyond the debt- or’s pre-bankruptcy rights.”), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 103 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989); In re Bishop College, 151 B.R. 394, 398-399 (Bankr.N.D.Tx.1993); In re Draughon Training Institute, Inc., 119 B.R. 927, 933 (Bankr.W.D.La.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Dow Corning Corp.
But its lesser known exception limits that general rule as follows: “Unless some *441 federal interest requires a different result, there is no reason why [state defined property] interests should be analyzed differently simply because an interested party is involved in a bankruptcy proceeding.” 440 U.S. at 55 , 99 S.Ct. at 918 (emphasis added); see also Foos, 183 B.R. at 157 (“A particular state law will continue to apply ... until there is ‘actual conflict with the system provided by the Bankruptcy [Code]....”’) (quoting from Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc. (In re FCX, …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
George E. Slattery, Jr. v. L. William Bower
See also Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Rees, 852 F.2d 595, 598 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 1118 , 103 L.Ed.2d 181 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNIVERSAL COOPERATIVES, INC.
v.
FCX, INC.
v.
FCX, INC.
No. 88-753.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1989.
109 S. Ct. 1118
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Denied.