green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.4 score
“if a client communicates information to his attorney with the understanding that the information will be revealed to others, that information as well as 'the details underlying the data which was to be published' will not enjoy the privilege”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
First Heights Bank, FSB v. United States
if a client communicates information to his attorney with the understanding that the information will be revealed to others, that information as well as 'the details underlying the data which was to be published' will not enjoy the privilege
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Madrid v. Gomez
prison administrators' indifference to brutal behavior by guards toward inmates sufficient to state an eighth amendment claim
discussed
Cited "see"
Brasfield & Gorrie LLC v. Hirschfeld Steel Group LP
See Cox v. Administrator U.S. Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1422 (11th Cir.), opinion modified on reh'g, 30 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 1994) (“[T]he subject-matter waiver doctrine does not extend to materials protected by the opinion work product privilege.”) (citing In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619 , 625–26 (4th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S. Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of America, N.A. v. Terra Nova Insurance
See In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 625-26 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); In re Sealed Case, 676 F.2d 793, 822-23 (D.C.Cir.1982); Bowne v. AmBase Corp., 150 F.R.D. 465, 485-86 (S.D.N.Y.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blair v. State
See generally United States v. Pollard (In re Martin Marietta Corp.), 856 F.2d 619, 624 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); Nutramax Lab., Inc. v. Twin Lab.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tomison
See Beckford, supra, 964 F.Supp. at 1018 -19 (citing In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 621 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied sub nom., Martin Marietta Corp. v. Pollard, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Splunge v. Parke
(2×)
See Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2674, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4438, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5369 Jose Ortiz-Sandoval v. James Gomez, Director of Corrections for the State of California
See Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967, 970 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Mark KOCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James G. RICKETTS, Defendant-Appellee
See Vaughan v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 736 (9th Cir.1988) cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989) (Vaughan I).
cited
Cited "see"
Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez
See Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967, 970 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Ring v. Commercial Union Insurance
See generally In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.
See In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 622-25 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Lilly v. Jerry D. Gilmore, Warden
See Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); Cramer v. Fahner, 683 F.2d 1376, 1385 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 376 , 74 L.Ed.2d 509 (1982); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Act Up!/Portland v. Bagley
See Vaughan v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 736, 741 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Act Up!/Portland v. Bagley
See Vaughan v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 736, 741 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Arditti, United States of America v. Guillermo Avila
(2×)
Rule 17(c) merely requires that the moving party make a good faith effort to obtain evidence--instead of embarking on "a fishing expedition to see what might turn up." Id. at 678, 679 (holding subpoena's "catch-all provision ... not intended to produce evidentiary materials"); see In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 622 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989). 94 To this end, a party demanding materials must unfasten three locks to free the 17(c) door.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest James Perkins
(2×)
See Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967, 972 (7th Cir.1988) (error not harmless where evidence of guilt was "impressive but not overwhelming"), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diggs v. State
Like other qualified privileges, it may be waived.”); see, e.g., In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 625 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989) (information voluntarily disclosed constitutes an implied waiver of attorney work product protections).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adams v. State
(2×)
Cox, 422 N.E.2d at 362; see also Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967 (7th Cir.1988) (citing Keyset and Cox in granting petition for writ of habeas corpus based on threat evidence that was unconnected to defendant), teh’g denied, cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.
See, e.g., Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1422-23 (11th Cir.1994) and United States v. Pollard (In re Martin Marietta Corp.), 856 F.2d 619, 625-26 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 839, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1369 Tomas Armendariz Rosa C. Armendariz Harry Julian Brown, Jr. Lance A. Bukouskis v. James F. Penman W.R. Holcomb David M. Stachowski Cecil Dillard Kenneth J. Henderson, Tomas Armendariz Rosa C. Armendariz Harry Julian Brown, Jr. Lance A. Bukouskis v. James F. Penman W.R. Holcomb David M. Stachowski Cecil Dillard Kenneth J. Henderson, and Al Boughey Larry Reed, Tomas Armendariz Rosa C. Armendariz v. James F. Penman
Id. at 1409; see, e.g., Vaughan v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 736, 738 (9th Cir.1988) (prison warden violated prisoners' substantive due process rights by conducting rectal searches for malicious purposes), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); Rutherford v. Berkeley, 780 F.2d 1444, 1446 (9th Cir.1986) (excessive force against arrestees violated substantive due process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armendariz v. Penman
Id. at 1409; see, e.g., Vaughan v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 736, 738 (9th Cir.1988) (prison warden violated prisoners’ substantive due process rights by conducting rectal searches for malicious purposes), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); Rutherford v. Berkeley, 780 F.2d 1444, 1446 (9th Cir.1986) (excessive force against arrestees violated substantive due process).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Murray Sheet Metal Company, Incorporated, and Arkwright Mutual Insurance Company
See, e.g., United States v. Pollard (In re Martin Marietta Corp.), 856 F.2d 619 (4th Cir.1988), cert, denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis R. Cookish v. Commissioner Ronald Powell
Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. at 641 , 107 S.Ct. at 3039 ; see also Vaughan v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 736, 739 (9th Cir.1988) (a defendant is entitled to summary judgment granting him qualified immunity if he can establish that “ ‘a reasonable officer could have believed that the search comported with [the Constitution] even though it actually did not’ ” (quoting Anderson, supra)), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meyer v. Fidelity Savings
An error of instruction will not be reversed "if it is more probably than not harmless." Benigni, 879 F.2d at 479 ; see also Kisor v. Johns-Mansville Corp., 783 F.2d 1337 , 1340 (9th Cir.1986) ("We must consider whether the instruction ... [is] to the prejudice of the objecting party"). 67 We conclude that the error in this case was non-prejudicial based on our finding that, as a matter of law, " 'the facts alleged ... [do not] support a claim of violation of clearly established law.' " Vaughan v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 736, 739 (9th Cir.1988) (quoting Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511 , 528 n. 9,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp.
It is settled that loss of the attorney-client privilege extends “ ‘to the substance of a communication’ ... and requires the attorney to disclose ‘the details underlying the data which was to be published.” In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 727 F.2d at 1356 (quoting United States v. Cote, 456 F.2d 142, 145 (8th Cir.1972)); see also In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir.1988) (same), cert. denied Martin Marietta Corp. v. Pollard, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); In re Sealed Case, 676 F.2d 793, 809 (D.C.Cir. 1982) (waiver extends “to all oth…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berry v. City Of Muskogee
See, e.g., Vaughan v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 736, 741-42 (9th Cir.1988) (digital body cavity searches, "while involving a threat to security, did not constitute an ongoing prison disturbance," and "the officers were not confronted with an instantaneous decision whether to conduct the searches in the manner described"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); Stubbs v. Dudley, 849 F.2d 83, 86 (2d Cir.1988) ("Whitley does not require that every case involving a guard's failure to protect a prisoner threatened by other prisoners be decided under a heightened standard app…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berry v. City of Muskogee
See, e.g., Vaughan v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 736, 741-42 (9th Cir.1988) (digital body cavity searches, “while involving a threat to security, did not constitute an ongoing prison disturbance,” and “the officers were not confronted with an instantaneous decision whether to conduct the searches in the manner described”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); Stubbs v. Dudley, 849 F.2d 83, 86 (2d Cir.1988) (“ Whitley does not require that every case involving a guard’s failure to protect a prisoner threatened by other prisoners be decided under a heightened st…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lesko v. Owens
Compare Bisaccia, 623 F.2d at 312 -13 and Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967 (7th Cir.1988), with (Panzavecchia v. Wainwright, 658 F.2d 337, 341-42 (5th Cir.1981)), cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989) 8 At oral argument it was also suggested that the "abuse of discretion" standard--the standard accorded a district court's balancing of prejudice and relevance pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 403--might be applicable here.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lesko v. Owens
Compare Bisaccia, 623 F.2d at 312 -13 and Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967 (7th Cir.1988), with (Panzavecchia v. Wainwright, 658 F.2d 337, 341-42 (5th Cir.1981)), cert. denied — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Duckworth, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison
v.
Dudley
v.
Dudley
No. 88-1324.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 3, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. California (1) · Federal Claims (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respond[*1012] ent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.