green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Tachiona v. Mugabe
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989) (holding that Marcos's illegal acts were not official acts pursuant to his authority as President of the Philippines, the court stated Marcos "was not the state, but the head of state, bound by the laws that applied to him”); Jimenez v. Aristeguieta, 311 F.2d 547, 557 (5th Cir.1962) ("Even though characterized as a dictator, appellant was not himself the sovereign' — government—of Venezuela within the Act of State Doctrine.
cited
Cited "see"
Roxas v. Marcos
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1360-61 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989) (Republic II).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Estate Of Ferdinand Marcos
See Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Hilao v. Estate of Marcos
See Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Electric Capital Corporation Gelco Corporation International Couriers Corporation v. N. Bud Grossman Andrew C. Grossman Richard W. McFerran Air Canada, a Canadian Corporation Peat Marwick Thorne, Formerly Doing Business as Thorne, Ernst & Whinney Deloitte & Touche, Formerly Doing Business as Touche (Usa) Deloitte & Touche, Formerly Doing Business as Touche Ross (Canada), (Canada), General Electric Capital Corporation Gelco Corporation International Couriers Corporation v. N. Bud Grossman Andrew C. Grossman Richard W. McFerran Air Canada, a Canadian Corporation Peat Marwick Thorne, Formerly Doing Business as Thorne, Ernst & Whinney Deloitte & Touche, Formerly Doing Business as Touche (Usa) Deloitte & Touche (Canada), Formerly Doing Business as Touche Ross (Canada)
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1360-61 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989); Jimenez v. Aristeguieta, 311 F.2d 547, 557-58 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 914 , 83 S.Ct. 1302 , 10 L.Ed.2d 415 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Electric Capital Corp. v. Grossman
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1360-61 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989); Jimenez v. Aristeguieta, 311 F.2d 547, 557-58 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 914 , 83 S.Ct. 1302 , 10 L.Ed.2d 415 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reebok International, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc.
(2×)
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1361 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reebok International, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc.
(2×)
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1364 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989). .Conatech S.A. did not appear in the district court and does not appeal the issuance of the injunction. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Liu v. Republic of China
"The 'touchstone' or 'crucial element' is the potential for interference with our foreign relations." OPEC, 649 F.2d at 1360 ; see Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1361 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989) (the doctrine did not apply in a suit against the deposed dictator of the Philippines by the present government because "[t]he doctrine is meant to facilitate the foreign relations of the United States, not to furnish the equivalent of sovereign immunity to a deposed leader."). 78 The burden of proving acts of sta…
discussed
Cited "see"
Liu v. Republic of China
“The ‘touchstone’ or ‘crucial element’ is the potential for interference with our foreign relations.” OPEC, 649 F.2d at 1360 ; see Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1361 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989) (the doctrine did not apply in a suit against the deposed dictator of the Philippines by the present government because “[t]he doctrine is meant to facilitate the foreign relations of the United States, not to furnish the equivalent of sovereign immunity to a deposed leader.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Madanes v. Madanes
(2×)
See, e.g., Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1358 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc) (finding RICO subject matter jurisdiction in suit by foreign country against former president and wife where defendants allegedly transferred stolen assets to United States), cert, denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989); Bank of Crete, S.A. v. Koskotas, No. 88 CIV. 8412, 1991 WL 177287 at *6 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. City of Medina
See also Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1362 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Lizeric Realty Corp.
Compare In re Cedar Tide Corp., 859 F.2d 1127, 1128 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 405 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Siderman Blake v. Republic of Argentina
"The burden of proving acts of state rests on the party asserting the applicability of the doctrine." Liu, 892 F.2d at 1432 ; see also Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1361 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Siderman de Blake v. Republic of Argentina
“The burden of proving acts of state rests on the party asserting the applicability of the doctrine.” Liu, 892 F.2d at 1432 ; see also Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1361 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities and Exchange Commission v. International Swiss Investments Corporation the Leverage Fund the Sulfur Fund Leonard C. Zrnic Jana Whyman, Securities and Exchange Commission v. International Swiss Investments Corporation the Leverage Fund the Sulfur Fund Leonard C. Zrnic Jana L. Whyman, AKA Jana Zrnic Alexander Montegue Alexander Barker David Watson
"Once personal jurisdiction of a party is obtained, the District Court has authority to order it to 'freeze' property under its control, whether the property be within or without the United States." United States v. First Nat'l City Bank, 379 U.S. 378, 384 , 85 S.Ct. 528, 531 , 13 L.Ed.2d 365 (1965) (freeze of assets of Uruguayan corporation with bank accounts in Uruguay); see also Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1363-64 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989). 22 Likewise, the court is not foreclosed from granting th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. International Swiss Investments Corp.
“Once personal jurisdiction of a party is obtained, the District Court has authority to order it to ‘freeze’ property under its control, whether the property be within or without the United States." United States v. First Nat’l City Bank, 379 U.S. 378, 384 , 85 S.Ct. 528, 531 , 13 L.Ed.2d 365 (1965) (freeze of assets of Uruguayan corporation with bank accounts in Uruguay); see also Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1363-64 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See, e.g., Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989); Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344 (2d Cir.1986), cert. dismissed, 480 U.S. 942 , 107 S.Ct. 1597 , 94 L.Ed.2d 784 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CHANDLER'S COVE INN, LTD.
v.
CEDAR TIDE CORPORATION
v.
CEDAR TIDE CORPORATION
No. 88-1435.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Apr 24, 1989.
109 S. Ct. 1933
Published
Denied.