green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"The Federal Aviation Act does not expressly pre-empt state damages remedies."
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
DiChristopher v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS
the federal aviation act does not expressly pre-empt state damages remedies.
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Fresnos Consolidated Independent School District and Michael L. Williams, Commissioner of Education v. Jorge Vazquez
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Exam’rs v. Sizemore, 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 (1989); Nelson v. Weatherwax, 59 S.W.3d 340, 343 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Page 33 2001, pet. denied).
discussed
Cited "see"
Deborah K. Nordyke v. Employees Retirement System of Texas
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore , 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. 1988), cert. denied , 490 U.S. 1080 (1989); Lone Star Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Railroad Comm'n , 800 S.W.2d 924, 928 (Tex. App.--Austin 1990, no writ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Hindman
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore, 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2100 , 104 L.Ed.2d 662 (1989); McKinley Iron Works, Inc. v. Texas Employment Comm’n, 917 S.W.2d 468, 470 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1996, no writ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Bond
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore, 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2100 , 104 L.Ed.2d 662 (1989); McKinley Iron Works, Inc. v. Texas Employment Comm’n, 917 S.W.2d 468, 470 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1996, no writ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Home Management, Inc. v. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation
(2×)
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Exam’rs v. Sizemore, 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2100 , 104 L.Ed.2d 662 (1989); Texas Health Facilities Comm’n v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc., 665 S.W.2d 446, 453 (Tex.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Braun v. Board of Dental Examiners
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore, 759 S.W2d 114, 117 (Tex. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 (1989); cf. Homoly, 479 S.E.2d at 218 (board composed of licensed dental professionals best qualified to judge whether petitioner violated standard of care).
cited
Cited "see"
Texas State Board of Medical Examiners v. Scheffey
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore, 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2100 , 104 L.Ed.2d 662 (1989); Wilmer-Hutchins Indep.
discussed
Cited "see"
the City of Plano, Texas v. Public Utility Commission and MFS Intelenet of Texas, Inc.
(2×)
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore , 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. 1988), cert. denied , 490 U.S., 1080 (1989); Texas Health Facilities Comm'n v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc. , 665 S.W.2d 446, 453 (Tex. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Plano v. Public Utility Commission
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore, 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S., 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2100 , 104 L.Ed.2d 662 (1989); Texas Health Facilities Comm’n v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc., 665 S.W.2d 446, 453 (Tex.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Texas State Board of Medical Examiners v. Eric Heston Scheffey, M.D.
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore , 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. 1988), cert. denied , 490 U.S. 1080 (1989); Wilmer-Hutchins Indep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Industrial Utilities Service, Inc. v. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore, 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2100 , 104 L.Ed.2d 662 (1989); Texas Health Facilities Comm’n v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc., 665 S.W.2d 446, 453 (Tex.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Industrial Utilities Service, Inc./Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission/Industrial Utilities Service, Inc.
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore , 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. 1988), cert. denied , 490 U.S. 1080 (1989); Texas Health Facilities Comm'n v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc. , 665 S.W.2d 446, 453 (Tex. 1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Board of Trustees of the Employees Retirement System v. Benge
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore, 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2100 , 104 L.Ed.2d 662 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Board of Trustees of the Employees Retirement System of Texas and Group Life & Health Insurance v. Linda T. Benge
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore , 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. 1988), cert. denied , 490 U.S. 1080 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Sherman v. Henry
(2×)
See Texas State Bd. of Dented Examiners v. Sizemore, 759 S.W.2d 114, 116-17 (Tex.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2100 , 104 L.Ed.2d 662 (1989); Firemen’s & Policemen’s Civil Serv.
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists v. Ronald v. Kidd, Ph.D.
See Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore , 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. 1988), cert. denied , 490 U.S. 1080 (1989); Texas Health Facilities Comm'n v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc. , 665 S.W.2d 446, 449-50 (Tex. 1984). 4.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaufmann v. United States
See Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (b) Requirement of Personal Misconduct of Defendants Bivens claims (i.e. counts I through III and V in this action) and claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 “are identical save for the replacement of a state actor (§ 1983) by a federal actor (Bivens).” Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463, 469 (7th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Saldana v. City of Camden
See Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F. 2d 463, 465 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied sub nom., City of Chicago v. Bieneman, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 104 L.Ed. 2d 661 (1989) (class action not allowed on behalf of 3,000 residents adversely affected by airport noise in view of different effect on each owner depending on topography, flight patterns, and many other variables).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stewart v. American Airlines, Inc.
See Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463, 471-72 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989). 8 . 49 U.S.C.A. § 1506 (West 1976) provides: Nothing contained in this chapter shall in any way abridge or alter the remedies now existing at common law or by statute, but the provisions of this chapter are in addition to such remedies. 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Steven Hill v. William Shelander
See Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463, 469-470 (7th Cir.1988), certiorari denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989), for a discussion of the applicable Illinois statute of limitations in Section 1983 actions. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Biddison v. City Of Chicago
See Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989) 2 The ripeness doctrine is used by federal courts to "enforce prudential limitations upon their jurisdiction." Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247, 1261 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Biddison v. City of Chicago
See Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DiBiase v. Commissioner of Insurance
See, e.g., Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463, 469 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. den., 490 U.S. 1080 (1989) (no reason to have a different statute of limitations for direct constitutional claims); Steinberg v. City of Cambridge, 413 Mass. 736, 738 (1992), cert. den. 508 U.S. 909 (1993) (due process and taking claims under the state constitution should be reviewed by same standards as those brought under the federal constitution).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
287 Corporate Center Associates v. The Township of Bridgewater, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey
See, e.g., Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463, 469-70 (7th Cir.1988) (action brought directly under 5th Améndment), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Chin v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.1987) (action brought directly under 14th Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
287 Corp Ctr Assoc v. Bridgewater Twp.
See, e.g., Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463, 469-70 (7th Cir. 1988) (action brought directly under 5th Amendment), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 (1989); Chin v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 21 (2d Cir. 1987) (action brought directly under 14th Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kirsch
“The degree of specificity required in a search warrant depends upon the nature of the items to be seized.” State v. Emery, 123 N.H. 630, 633 , 465 A.2d 922, 924 (1983) (warrant authorizing search for nude photos, “restraining devices,” and “other devices used in S & M sexual activity” sufficiently particular); see also State v. Fitanides, 131 N.H. 298, 301 , 552 A.2d 1379, 1380 (1988) (“fireworks, smokebombs, records, ledgers, U.S. Currency, and slot machines” sufficient where “a more precise description of the goods to be seized was a practical impossibility”), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Somerville v. Public Utility Commission
(2×)
This second requirement reflects the rule that an agency's decision, whether or not based on an NUS, must be supported by substantial evidence. [6] APA § 2001.174(2)(E); see also Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore, 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2100 , 104 L.Ed.2d 662 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Somerville, City of New Waverly and Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission, Gulf States Utilities Company and Texas Industrial Energy Consumers
This second requirement reflects the rule that an agency's decision, whether or not based on an NUS, must be supported by substantial evidence. (6) APA § 2001.174(2)(E); see also Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Sizemore , 759 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. 1988), cert. denied , 490 U.S. 1080 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wrenn
v.
State Industrial Insurance System
v.
State Industrial Insurance System
No. 88-1463.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 22, 1989.
490 U.S. 1080
Published
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.