green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1990 ·
…the judicial relief of civil penalties, even if payable only to the united states department of the treasury, is causally connected to a citizen-plaintiff's injury
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. And Friends of the Earth v. Powell Duffryn Terminals Inc., United States Environmental Protection Agency, Intervenor. Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. And Friends of the Earth v. Powell Duffryn Terminals Inc. Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. And Friends of the Earth v. Powell Duffryn Terminals Inc. Appeal of William B. Reilly, in His Capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the judicial relief of civil penalties, even if payable only to the united states department of the treasury, is causally connected to a citizen-plaintiff's injury
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the judicial relief of civil penalties, even if payable only to the united states department of the treasury, is causally connected to a citizen-plaintiff's injury
discussed
Cited "see"
PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
Id. at 226 , 654 F.2d at 79 ; accord Lopez v. A. C. & S., Inc., 858 F.2d 712, 717 (Fed.Cir. 1988) (“[T]he government is entitled to presume that one who bids on a government invitation knows his own capabilities and has ascertained he will be able to produce, and at what cost____”), cert. denied sub nom., Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc. v. United States, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989); Crouse-Hinds Sepco Corp., D.O.T.C.A.B.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gulf States Steel, Inc.
Thus, [the plaintiff] has established liability under the Clean Water Act (emphasis added); accord Sierra Club v. Simkins Industries, Inc., 847 F.2d 1109 , 1115 n. 8 (4th Cir.1988) (DMRs may be used as admissions in court to establish a defendant's liability), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989); Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co. of California, 813 F.2d 1480, 1491-92 (9th Cir.1987) (DMRs are conclusive evidence of a permit violation), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 485 U.S. 931 , 108 S.Ct. 1102 , 99 L.Ed.2d 264 (1988). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Trident Seafoods Corporation, and Tom Stakkeland James Hinton
(2×)
See Sierra Club v. Simkins Indus., Inc., 847 F.2d 1109, 1114 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989); see also Chesapeake Bay Foundation v. Gwaltney, 791 F.2d 304 , 314-15 (4th Cir.1986), vacated on other grounds, 484 U.S. 49 , 108 S.Ct. 376 , 98 L.Ed.2d 306 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bath Iron Works Corporation v. United States
See Lopez v. A.C. & S., Inc., 858 F.2d 712, 716 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989) ( 31 U.S.C. § 1304 provides a standing appropriation to pay court judgments and appeal board awards).
cited
Cited "see"
Wm. T. Thompson Co. v. United States
See generally, Lopez v. A.C. & S., Inc., 858 F.2d 712, 717-18 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 3186, 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Hercules Inc. v. United States
See generally, Lopez v. A. C. & S., Inc. 858 F.2d 712, 717-18 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 3186, 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Confederate Acres Sanitary Sewer & Drainage System, Inc.
See Sierra Club v. Simkins Industries, Inc., 847 F.2d 1109, 1113 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989), in which the Court found that as a result of the defendant’s reporting violations, “information on any harmful level of pollutants in the area of (the point discharge) during the time period is forever lost to environmental planners and policymakers and those who might undertake to remedy the effects of any pollution.” Confederate Acres benefited from its lack of compliance with the permit conditions and its subsequent operation without a p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Lumber Co.
See, e.g., Sierra Club v. Simkins Indus., Inc., 847 F.2d 1109 , 1112 n. 3 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989) (organization has representational standing to sue on member’s behalf for reporting violations under CWA because they are unable to know the full extent of the pollution).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Company Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant. Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Company Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee
Id., 454 U.S. at 472 , 102 S.Ct. at 759 (quoting Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood, 441 U.S. 91, 99 , 99 S.Ct. 1601, 1608 , 60 L.Ed.2d 66 (1979)); see also Sierra Club v. Simkins Indus., Inc., 847 F.2d 1109 , 1113 & n. 4 (4th Cir.1988) (noting that affidavit establishing threat of future injury met Article III standing requirements), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter v. Cedar Point Oil Co.
Id., 454 U.S. at 472 , 102 S.Ct. at 759 (quoting Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood, 441 U.S. 91, 99 , 99 S.Ct. 1601, 1608 , 60 L.Ed.2d 66 (1979)); see also Sierra Club v. Simkins Indus., Inc., 847 F.2d 1109 , 1113 & n. 4 (4th Cir.1988) (noting that affidavit establishing threat of future injury met Article III standing requirements), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Northwest Environmental Advocates, a Non-Profit Oregon Corporation and Nina Bell v. City of Portland
(2×)
See, e.g., Sierra Club v. Simkins Industries, Inc., 847 F.2d 1109, 1115 (4th Cir.1988) ("Simkins' reporting requirements are expressly made conditions of its permit, and therefore violations of these conditions, by operation of Sec. 1365(f)(6) [CWA Sec. 505(f)(6) ], are violations of an effluent standard or limitation of Sec. 1365(a)."), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Northwest Environmental Advocates, a Non-Profit Oregon Corporation and Nina Bell v. City of Portland
(2×)
See, e.g., Sierra Club v. Simkins Industries, Inc., 847 F.2d 1109, 1115 (4th Cir.1988) ("Simkins' reporting requirements are expressly made conditions of its permit, and therefore violations of these conditions, by operation of Sec. 1365(f)(6), are violations of an effluent standard or limitation of Sec. 1365(a)."), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Heart of America Northwest v. Westinghouse Hanford Co.
See, e.g., Sierra Club v. Simkins Industries, Inc., 847 F.2d 1109 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 904 , 109 S.Ct. 3185 , 105 L.Ed.2d 694 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. King
Lightbourne v. Dugger, 549 So.2d 1364, 1365-66 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 1505 , 108 L.Ed.2d 640 (1989); Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d 240, 243 (Fla. 1986); In re Estate of Carlton, 378 So.2d 1212, 1218 (Fla. 1979) (Overton, J. on denial of request for recusal), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 922 , 100 S.Ct. 3013 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1980); Ball v. Yates, 158 Fla. 521, 533 , 29 So.2d 729, 735 (1946), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 774 , 68 S.Ct. 66 , 92 L.Ed. 359 (1947); see Lawson v. Longo, 547 So.2d 1279, 1280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also Sierra Club v. Simkins Indus., Inc., 847 F.2d 1109 (4t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schoo
v.
United States Postal Service
v.
United States Postal Service
No. 88-1254.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 19, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied..