green
Positive treatment
9.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Deseret Management Corporation v. United States
See L & B Corp. v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 862 F.2d 667, 674 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 696 (1989); Consol.
discussed
Cited "see"
California v. Montrose Chemical Corp.
(2×)
See Kenaitze Indian Tribe v. State of Alaska, 860 F.2d 312, 317 (9th Cir.1988) (refusing to interpret the Alaskan National Interest Lands Conservation Act to create redundancy), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of California v. Montrose Chemical Corporation of California Pcb Industrial, Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. Stauffer Management Company Ici American Holdings, Inc. Atkemix Thirty-Seven, Inc. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees. (Two Cases). United States of America v. Montrose Chemical Corporation of California Pcb Industrial, Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. Stauffer Management Company Ici American Holdings, Inc. Atkemix Thirty-Seven, Inc. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees
(2×)
See Kenaitze Indian Tribe v. State of Alaska, 860 F.2d 312, 317 (9th Cir.1988) (refusing to interpret the Alaskan National Interest Lands Conservation Act to create redundancy), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989). 71 The Trustees argue that because "incident involving release" is undefined, "incident" should be given its ordinary dictionary definition: "an occurrence of an action or situation that is a separate unit of experience" or a "happening." Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tommy Briscoe
See Lombardo v. United States, 865 F.2d 155, 159 (7th Cir.) (holding in case in which defendants claimed that the victims were defrauded only out of intangible rights, that the attempted sale of a piece of property at a price lower than existing higher bids constituted a scheme to obtain money or property by fraudulent means), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989); United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168-70 (7th Cir.) (holding that a futures broker committed fraud by causing customers to lose additional profits because broker personally traded ahead of the custo…
discussed
Cited "see"
7547 Corp. v. Parker & Parsley Development Partners, L.P.
E.g., Wingate, 795 S.W.2d at 719 ; see generally, Leach v. FDIC, 860 F.2d 1266, 1269 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989); FDIC v. Howse, 802 F.Supp. 1554, 1561-62 (S.D.Tex.1992) (determination of whether claim is derivative turns on whether “all shareholders are “wounded’ or just one person has been hurt by the misconduct.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Native Village of Quinhagak v. United States
(2×)
See Kenaitze Indian Tribe v. Alaska, 860 F.2d 312, 318 (9th Cir.1988) (criticizing the state for “tak[ing] away what Congress has given” to rural Alaskans by interpreting ANILCA to “protect commercial and sport fishing interests”), ce rt. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Native Village Of Quinhagak v. United States
(2×)
See Kenaitze Indian Tribe v. Alaska, 860 F.2d 312, 318 (9th Cir.1988) (criticizing the state for "tak[ing] away what Congress has given" to rural Alaskans by interpreting ANILCA to "protect commercial and sport fishing interests"), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chanoff v. United States Surgical Corp.
See Leach v. FDIC, 860 F.2d 1266, 1273 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989) (finding that shareholders failed to state viable RICO claim because they did not allege injury to property that was distinct from injury suffered by corporation, and therefore had not alleged individual injury required under RICO); cf. Ceribelli v. Elghanayan, 990 F.2d 62, 62-63 (2d Cir.1993) (so long as plaintiffs suffered injury directly, they had standing to bring RICO claim even if corporation suffered identical injury for which it had similar right to recovery).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brandt v. Bassett
See Leach v. FDIC, 860 F.2d 1266, 1269, 1272 (5th Cir.1988) (FDIC succeeds to claims of failed bank), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989); Gaff v. FDIC, 814 F.2d 311, 315 (6th Cir.) (same), mod. on reh'g on other grounds, 828 F.2d 1145 (6th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wyatt, by and Through Rawlins v. King
See S.H. v. Edwards, 860 F.2d 1045 (11th Cir.1988) (per curiam), clarified, 886 F.2d 292 (11th Cir.) (en banc) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 696 (1989); Hanson v. Clarke County, Iowa, 867 F.2d 1115 , 1119—1120 (8th Cir.1989); Lelsz v. Kavanagh, 807 F.2d 1243, 1249-51 (5th Cir.1987); Society for Good Will to Retarded Children v. Cuomo, 737 F.2d 1239 , 1248-49 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walters
See Lombardo v. U.S., 865 F.2d 155, 159-160 (7th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989); See also U.S. v. Diwan, 864 F.2d 715, 719-20 (11th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 492 U.S. 921 , 109 S.Ct. 3249 , 106 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Sunrise Securities Litigation.
See Leach v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 860 F.2d 1266, 1274 (5th Cir.1988) (incorporation of state law into RICO for purposes of shareholder suits implicates problem of uniformity throughout the states but is preferable to generating federal common law in this area), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989); see also Morgan, 797 F.2d at 475 (when federal government is not party to litigation, neutral state rules that do not undermine federal interests should be applied unless statute or constitution authorizes federal court to create federal rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
Popkin v. Jacoby (In re Sunrise Securities Litigation)
See Leach v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 860 F.2d 1266, 1274 (5th Cir.1988) (incorporation of state law into RICO for purposes of shareholder suits implicates problem of uniformity throughout the states but is preferable to generating federal common law in this area), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989); see also Morgan, 797 F.2d at 475 (when federal government is not party to litigation, neutral state rules that do not undermine federal interests should be applied unless statute or constitution authorizes federal court to create federal rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Riggs
See Lombardo v. United States, 865 F.2d 155, 157 (7th Cir.) (holding that the two elements of a wire fraud claim under § 1343 are a scheme to defraud and the use of wire communications in furtherance of the scheme), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
S.H. And P.F., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Joe Edwards and R. Derril Gay, Individually and in Their Official Capacities
See S.H. v. Edwards, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 696 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
S.H. v. Edwards
See S.H. v. Edwards, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 696 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Katie John v. Alaska Fish and Wildlife Fed
(2×)
Code § 99.020 (1982) ("In this chapter, 'rural' means outside the road connected area of a borough, municipality, or other community with a population of 7,000 or more, as determined by the Alaska Department of Community and regional Affairs.”), reprinted in Bobby, 718 F.Supp. at 795 ; see also Kenaitze Indian Tribe v. Alaska, 860 F.2d 312, 314 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989). 19 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaiser v. Stewart
See also Leach v. FDIC, 860 F.2d 1266, 1273-74 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roma Construction Company and Peter Zanni v. Ralph R. Arusso
(2×)
See, e.g., Leach v. FDIC, 860 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lundman v. McKown
(2×)
See Hermanson v. State, 570 So.2d 322, 328-29 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990) (seven-year-old diabetic died in spite of Florida’s criminally sanctioned reporting requirements), rev’d, 604 So.2d 775 (Fla.1992); see also Walker v. Superior Court, 47 Cal.3d 112 , 253 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 763 P.2d 852, 871 (1988) (authorities generally will not learn of faith healing unless and until someone dies), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vernon v. City of Los Angeles
See also Walker v. Superior Court, 47 Cal.3d 112 , 253 Cal.Rptr. 1, 18-20 , 763 P.2d 852, 869-71 (1988) (applying federal balancing test and compelling state interest analysis as a matter of state constitutional law), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989); Molko, 46 Cal.3d 1092 , 252 Cal.Rptr. at 133 , 762 P.2d at 57 (same); In re Arias, 42 Cal.3d 667 , 230 Cal.Rptr. 505, 520 , 725 P.2d 664, 679 (1986) (same). 36 In Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 L.Ed.2d 965 (1963), the Supreme Court articulated the balancing test that has traditionally bee…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vernon v. City of Los Angeles
See also Walker v. Superior Court, 47 Cal.3d 112 , 253 Cal.Rptr. 1, 18-20 , 763 P.2d 852, 869-71 (1988) (applying federal balancing test and compelling state interest analysis as a matter of state constitutional law), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 905 , 109 S.Ct. 3186 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989); Molko, 46 Cal.3d 1092 , 252 Cal.Rptr. at 133 , 762 P.2d at 57 (same); In re Arias, 42 Cal.3d 667 , 230 Cal.Rptr. 505, 520 , 725 P.2d 664, 679 (1986) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sohappy v. Hodel
(2×)
See, e.g., Kenaitze Indian Tribe v. Alaska, 860 F.2d 312, 318-20 (9th Cir.1988) (Noonan, J., concurring), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sohappy v. Hodel
(2×)
See, e.g., Kenaitze Indian Tribe v. Alaska, 860 F.2d 312, 318-20 (9th Cir.1988) (Noonan, L, concurring), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 3187 , 105 L.Ed.2d 695 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc.
Compare Roitman v. New York City Transit Authority, 704 F.Supp. 346, 348 (E.D.N.Y.1989) (inability to obtain employment was not a deprivation of a property interest for purposes of mail and wire fraud statutes) and United States v. Slay, 717 F.Supp. 689, 693 (E.D.Mo.1989) ("mere contemplation of an ongoing contractual relationship" does not rise to a property right protected by the mail and wire fraud statutes) with Lombardo v. United States, 865 F.2d 155, 159-160 (7th Cir.) (defendants’ fraudulent manipulation of sale of pension fund property caused deprivation of property interest where fu…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alaska
v.
Kenaitze Indian Tribe
v.
Kenaitze Indian Tribe
No. 88-1642.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 19, 1989.
Cited by 57 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.