green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brown
See United States v. Infante-Ruiz, 13 F.3d 498 , 503 *10 (1st Cir.1994) (government bears the burden of showing by preponderance of the evidence that item would inevitably have been discovered by lawful means); see generally United States v. Roberts, 852 F.2d 671, 675-76 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 583 (1988) (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 447 , 104 S.Ct. 2501 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984)) (“evidence that was illegally obtained will not be suppressed ‘if the government can prove that the evidence would have been obtained inevitably’ even if the…
cited
Cited "see"
Healey v. Southwood
See Rider v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 982 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S. Ct. 556 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Brenda L. Healey v. Southwood Psychiatric Hospital, a Pennsylvania Corporation Lakewood Psychiatric, a Pennsylvania Corporation
See Rider v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 982 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 582 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Searches of Semtex Indus. Corp.
See Roberts v. United States, 656 F.Supp. 929 (S.D.N.Y.1987), reversed on other grounds, 852 F.2d 571 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 583 (1988) (s’tating that the rule says nothing about prudential considerations or irreparable harm); see also Application of First United Financial Corp., 620 F.Supp. 1450 (E.D.N.Y.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Graham
See Rider v. Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 982, 988-95 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 582 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Graham v. Internal Revenue Service (In re Graham)
See Rider v. Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 982, 988-95 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 582 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald Caldeira v. County of Kauai
See Rider v. Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 982, 994 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 582 (1988) (giving preclusive effect in a subsequent Title VII suit to a state court's review of an arbitrator’s decision).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
Johnson, Sr., filed June 25, 1993, at 38; see also United States v. Roberts, 852 F.2d 671 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 583 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sewell v. New York City Transit Authority
See, e.g., Rider v. Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 982, 986-87, 995 (3d Cir.1988) (according preclusive effect where state court decided discrimination issue on the merits in vacating arbitrator’s decision), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 582 (1988); Genova v. Town of Southampton, 776 F.2d 1560, 1561 (2d Cir.1985) (upholding preclusive effect of state court confirmation of arbitrator’s decision where plaintiff actually litigated the award’s validity in state court).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodziewicz v. Beyer
Compare Jalil, 873 F.2d at 705-06 (state court review of arbitrator’s decision not given preclusive effect) with Rider v. Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 982, 991 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 582 (1988) (state court review of arbitrator’s decision given preclusive effect).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Metrologic Instruments, Inc.
“When an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and a determination is essential to the judgment, the determination is conclusive in a subsequent action *1400 between the same parties, whether on the same or a different claim.” Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27 (1982); NLRB v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 930 F.2d 316, 319 (3d Cir.1991); see also Rider v. Commonwealth of Pa., 850 F.2d 982, 989 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 582 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.
Statutory Preclusion According to the general rule regarding issue preclusion, or collateral es-toppel, “[w]hen an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, and the determination is essential to the judgment, the determination is conclusive in a subsequent action between the parties, whether on the same or a different claim.” Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27 (1982); see also Rider v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 982, 989 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 993 , 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 582 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Burke
See also United States v. Roberts, 852 F.2d 671 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 556 , 102 L.Ed.2d 583 (1988) (remanding to district court for determination whether good faith exception applies to overly broad warrant).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dwight A. McKABNEY, et ux.
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 88-489.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 1, 1989.
109 S. Ct. 556
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Case below, 852 F.2d 1293.