green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivkin v. Dover Township Rent Leveling Board
See Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. San Luis Obispo County, 830 F.2d 977, 983 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 827 , 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988) (Parrott rule applicable to due process violation occasioned by county supervisor voting in matter in which he had a conflict of interest); Holloway v. Walker, 784 F.2d 1287, 1291-93 (5th Cir.1986) (Parrott rule applicable to alleged conspiracy between trial judge and other litigants to deprive adverse litigants of their rights and property).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo Grande
See Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 841 F.2d 872, 878-79 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 827 , 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988) (county supervisor who votes on issue even though he had a conflict of interest does not have authority to establish county policy where board of supervisors may only act by majority vote). 11 The Kawaokas point to additional indirect evidence of racial animus, but this evidence is extremely weak.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo Grande
See Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 841 F.2d 872, 878-79 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 827 , 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988) (county supervisor who votes on issue even though he had a conflict of interest does not have authority to establish county policy where board of supervisors may only act by majority vote). 11 53 The Kawaokas point to additional indirect evidence of racial animus, but this evidence is extremely weak.
cited
Cited "see"
Carpenter v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
See Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 841 F.2d 872, 877 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 827 , 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Lodestar Co. v. County of Mono
See Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 841 F.2d 872, 876 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 827 , 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wanderer v. Johnston
See Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. San Luis Obispo City, 841 F.2d 872 , 878 n. 6 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 827 , 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988); Rainbow Pioneer No. 44-18-04A v. Hawaii-Nevada Investment, 711 F.2d 902, 905 (9th Cir.1983)
discussed
Cited "see"
Wanderer v. Johnston
See Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. San Luis Obispo City, 841 F.2d 872 , 878 n. 6 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 827 , 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988); Rainbow Pioneer No. 44-18-04A v. Hawaii-Nevada Investment, 711 F.2d 902, 905 (9th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian Tribe
(2×)
See, e.g., Blackfeet Indian Tribe v. Montana Power Co., 838 F.2d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sohappy v. Hodel
“While this court has recognized this canon of construction [in favor of Indian interests], it has also declined to apply it in light of competing deference given to an agency charged with [a] statute’s administration.” Haynes v. United States, 891 F.2d 235, 239 (9th Cir.1989) (citations omitted); see also Blackfeet Indian Tribe v. Montana Power Co., 838 F.2d 1055, 1057-59 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988), Cook Inlet Native Ass’n v. Bowen, 810 F.2d 1471, 1475-77 (9th Cir.1987); Shields v. United States, 698 F.2d 987, 990-91 (9th Cir.), cert.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sohappy v. Hodel
"While this court has recognized this canon of construction [in favor of Indian interests], it has also declined to apply it in light of competing deference given to an agency charged with [a] statute's administration." Haynes v. United States, 891 F.2d 235, 239 (9th Cir.1989) (citations omitted); see also Blackfeet Indian Tribe v. Montana Power Co., 838 F.2d 1055, 1057-59 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988), Cook Inlet Native Ass'n v. Bowen, 810 F.2d 1471 , 1475-77 (9th Cir.1987); Shields v. United States, 698 F.2d 987, 990-91 (9th Cir.), cert. denied…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-Barraza, Civ. A. No. 88-5161
See, e.g., Blackfeet Indian Tribe v. Montana Power Co., 838 F.2d 1055, 1057 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988); Native Village of Stevens v. Smith, 770 F.2d 1486, 1487 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1121 , 106 S.Ct. 1640 , 90 L.Ed.2d 185 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilson
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, summary judgment may be granted against a non-moving party “who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 841 F.2d 872, 876 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilson
The district court correctly concluded that the defendants' evidence was too speculative to withstand plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. 22 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, summary judgment may be granted against a non-moving party "who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof." Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 841 F.2d 872, 876 (9th Cir.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Karl O. Hoehne and Phyllis Hoehne v. County of San Benito Henry Solorio Frank Sabbatini Enos Silva and Edward Lydon
Under Ninth Circuit law, the final decision requirement can be avoided “if attempts to comply with that requirement would be futile.” Herrington, 857 F.2d at 569; see also Lake Nacimiento Ranch v. San Luis Obispo County, 841 F.2d 872, 876 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 79 , 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988); Kinzli, 818 F.2d at 1454 ; Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., 703 F.2d 1141 , 1146 n. 2 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 847 , 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kaschak
v.
Superior Court of California, Kern County (Pine Mountain Club Property Owners' Assn., Real Party in Interest)
v.
Superior Court of California, Kern County (Pine Mountain Club Property Owners' Assn., Real Party in Interest)
No. 87-2106.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.