green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Monaco v. Hogan
Similarly, County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 47, 56 , 111 S.Ct. 1661 , 114 L.Ed.2d 49 (1991) and Williams v. Ward, 845 F.2d 374, 381, 387 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1020 , 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 *358 (1989), also cited by plaintiffs, dealt with the issue of how long an individual arrested without a warrant could be detained without a probable cause hearing.
discussed
Cited "see"
Martinez v. Dretke
See Gilliard v. Scroggy, 847 F.2d 1141, 1147 (5th Cir.1988) (holding the decision not to make an opening statement in a death penalty case was “the essence of a strategic choice”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Bryant v. City Of New York
See generally Williams v. Ward, 845 F.2d 374, 375 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1020 , 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Bryant v. City of New York
See generally Williams v. Ward, 845 F.2d 374, 375 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1020 , 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Frost
See State v. Eaton, 524 So.2d 1194 (La.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989) (no error in charge that jury must find "that a mitigating circumstance exists if there is any substantial evidence to support it.") (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Shanks
See State v. Eaton, 524 So.2d 1194, 1208 (La.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. City of Seward
See Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Associated Builders And Contractors, Inc. v. City Of Seward
See Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989). 5 * We first address the Contractors' preemption argument that the NLRA prohibits Seward from enforcing the work preservation clause in its CBA with the IBEW. 6 In Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 475 U.S. 608 , 106 S.Ct. 1395 , 89 L.Ed.2d 616 (1986), the Supreme Court summarized its NLRA preemption case law.
cited
Cited "see"
Connelly v. Derwinski
See Harkins Amusement Enters., Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 , 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Connelly v. Derwinski
See Harkins Amusement Enters., Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 , 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation
See Harkins Amusement Enters., Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 , 490 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989) (recognizing that shared monopoly theory was “novel” and holding that no § 2 claim was stated “in this case,” but declining to adopt a general rule); cf. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 948 F.2d 536, 546-49 (9th Cir.1991) (rejecting “monopoly leveraging” doctrine under § 2).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Campbell
See State v. Eaton, 524 So.2d 1194 (La.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 , (1989), rehearing denied, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 1332 , 103 L.Ed.2d 600 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Norbert A. Schueller, J.D. v. Trw, Inc., Trw Information Services Division (Aka Trw Credit Data)
See Harkins Amusement Enter. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 , 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, sub nom, United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc., --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 817 (1989); and Anderson v. Cumming, 827 F.2d 1303, 1305 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles K. Kanekoa Warren E. Kanekoa v. City and County of Honolulu Douglas G. Gibb, and State of Hawaii, Defendant/intervenor-Appellee. Damien Melemai v. City and County of Honolulu Douglas G. Gibb
See Williams v. Ward, 845 F.2d 374, 388-89 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989) 2 The Ninth Circuit came to the same conclusion in an analogous area of law.
cited
Cited "see"
Kanekoa v. City & County of Honolulu
See Williams v. Ward, 845 F.2d 374, 388-89 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Torres v. McLaughlin
Compare Williams v. Ward, 845 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1988) (finding a 72 hour detention prior to a probable cause hearing to be unconstitutional), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1020 , 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989), with Bernard v. City of Palo Alto, 699 F.2d 1023 (9th Cir.1983) (holding that a probable cause hearing must occur within 24 hours of arrest). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McBride v. McBride
See also Carroll v. Moore, 228 Neb. 561 , 423 N.W.2d 757 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation. State of Arizona v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Continental Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. Phillips Petroleum Co. Caribou Four Corners, Inc. And Powerine Oil Co., State of California v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Atlantic Richfield Co. Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Oregon, on Behalf of Itself, Its Residents and All Political Subdivisions Within the State Similarly Situated v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Washington, on Behalf of Itself and Its Public Entities and Residents v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co.
Monsanto, 465 U.S. at 764 , 104 S.Ct. at 1471 (plaintiff must "present direct or circumstantial evidence" that reasonably tends to prove that the defendants were engaged in a conspiracy rather than acting independently) (emphasis added); see also Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 485 (9th Cir.1988) (circumstantial evidence found to be sufficiently unambiguous under Monsanto ), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989). 17 We think that the key to the proper interpretation of Matsushita lies in the Court's emphasis on the dange…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arizona v. Standard Oil Co.
Monsanto, 465 U.S. at 764 , 104 S.Ct. at 1471 (plaintiff must “present direct or circumstantial evidence” that reasonably tends to prove that the defendants were engaged in a conspiracy rather than acting independently) (emphasis added); see also Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 485 (9th Cir.1988) (circumstantial evidence found to be sufficiently unambiguous under Monsanto), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Korea Shipping Corporation v. New York Shipping Association--International Longshoremen's Association Pension Trust Fund and the Board of Trustees of the Nysa-Ila Pension Trust Fund, Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association-International Longshoremen's Association Pension Trust Fund, the Board of Trustees of the New York Shipping Association International Longshoremen's Association Pension Trust Fund, Defendants-Counterclaim Delta Steamship Lines, Inc., Crowley Maritime International (Inc) and Crowley Maritime Corporation, Counterclaim Co-Defendants
See, e.g., Spring Branch Mining Co. v. United Mine Workers, 691 F.Supp. 973, 976-78 (S.D.W.Va.1987), aff'd, 854 F.2d 37 (4th Cir.1988) (per curiam), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989); Warrior Coal Co. v. Connors, 649 F.Supp. 1090, 1096-97 (W.D.Va.1986). 33 Second, the carriers claim that there must be demonstrable harm to the Fund to justify the imposition of withdrawal liability.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Korea Shipping Corp. v. New York Shipping Ass'n-International Longshoremen's Ass'n Pension Trust Fund
See, e.g., Spring Branch Mining Co. v. United Mine Workers, 691 F.Supp. 973, 976-78 (S.D.W.Va.1987), aff'd, 854 F.2d 37 (4th Cir.1988) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989); Warrior Coal Co. v. Connors, 649 F.Supp. 1090, 1096-97 (W.D.Va.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lease Lights, Inc.
v.
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
v.
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
No. 88-785.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1989.
Cited by 89 opinions | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of Alliance for Fair Competition for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.