green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ambrosio
See Rivera v. United States, 928 F.2d 592, 604 (2d Cir.1991) (“Intentional or reckless omissions of material information ... may serve as the basis for a Franks challenge.”) (citing United States v. Campino, 890 F.2d 588, 592 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1068 , 110 S.Ct. 1787 , 108 L.Ed.2d 788 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see"
LoSacco v. City of Middletown
Id. at 871 (“Where an officer knows, or has reason to know, that he has materially misled a magistrate on the basis for a finding of probable cause, as where a factual omission is intended to enhance the contents of the affidavit as support for a conclusion of probable cause, the shield of qualified immunity is lost.”); see United States v. Campino, 890 F.2d 588, 592 (2d Cir.1989), cert denied, 494 U.S. 1068 , 110 S.Ct. 1787 , 108 L.Ed.2d 788 (1990). “[Rjecklessness may be inferred where the omitted information was critical to the probable cause determination.” Id.
cited
Cited "see"
Rivera v. United States
See United States v. Campino, 890 F.2d 588, 592 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1787 , 108 L.Ed.2d 788 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Rivera v. United States
See United States v. Campino, 890 F.2d 588, 592 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 1787 , 108 L.Ed.2d 788 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Angelo Fiataruolo, Angelo Veno v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Campino, 890 F.2d 588, 593 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1068 , 110 S.Ct. 1787 , 108 L.Ed.2d 788 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marco A. Echeverri
See, e.g., United States *681 v. Campino, 890 F.2d 588, 593 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 494 U.S. 1068 , 110 S.Ct. 1787 , 108 L.Ed.2d 788 (1990); United States v. Diaz, 878 F.2d 608, 619 (2d Cir), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 543 , 107 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989); United States v. DeSoto, 885 F.2d 354, 362 (7th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Rubio-Estrada, 857 F.2d 845 (1st Cir.1988) (noting approvingly, albeit without considering the issue raised by this appellant, that the jury had before it the expert testimony of a government witness who identified and explained a drug ledger).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ospina
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 89-6589.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 2, 1990.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.