green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
3.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…a federal court is confined to the administrative record in deciding an appeal under the apa, unless the plaintiff can make a 'strong showing of bad faith or improper behavior.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Levine
But see United States v. Little, 889 F.2d 1367, 1368-69 (5th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2176 , 109 L.Ed.2d 505 (1990).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Johns
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see United States v. Little, 889 F.2d 1367,1368 (5th Cir.1989) (presumption that county lost money when contractor paid kickbacks to defendant), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 2176 , 109 L.Ed.2d 505 (1990).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Von Eye v. United States
a federal court is confined to the administrative record in deciding an appeal under the apa, unless the plaintiff can make a 'strong showing of bad faith or improper behavior.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Downer v. United States Ex Rel. United States Department of Agriculture & Soil Conservation Service
a federal court is confined to the administrative record in deciding an appeal under the apa, unless the plaintiff can make a 'strong showing of bad faith or improper behavior.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrew J. Loney
See United States v. Little, 889 F.2d 1367, 1369 (5th Cir.1989) (implicitly holding that McNally , not § 1346, applies to pre-§ 1346 case), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 933 , 110 S.Ct. 2176 , 109 L.Ed.2d 505 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wallach, Rusty Kent London, Eugene Robert Wallach, A/K/A \E. Robert (Bob) Wallach
(2×)
See United States v. Little, 889 F.2d 1367, 1368 (5th Cir.1989) (concealment of economically material information can constitute mail fraud), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 2176 , 109 L.Ed.2d 505 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gregor v. Derwinski
See also Maxey v. Kadrovach, 890 F.2d 73, 76-76 (8th Cir.1989) (since plaintiff, a VA physician who claimed that he was discharged in violation of his constitutional rights to free speech and due process, could appeal agency decision to federal court under APA to gain redress, albeit limited in nature, plaintiff had no right to pursue constitutional tort claims against his supervisors), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 933 , 110 S.Ct. 2176 , 109 L.Ed.2d 505 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Canady v. Providence Hospital
See, e.g., Maxey v. Kadrovach, 890 F.2d 73 , 76 n. 2 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 933 , 110 S.Ct. 2176 , 109 L.Ed.2d 505 (1990); Goldsmith v. Harding Hosp., Inc., 762 F.Supp. 187 (S.D.Ohio 1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunn v. HOVIC
We “will interpret possible helpfulness to the trier of fact broadly and will favor admissibility in doubtful cases.” Linkstrom, 883 F.2d at 270 ; see also American Technology Resources v. United States, 893 F.2d 651, 655 (3d Cir.) (helpfulness standard interpreted broadly), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 933 , 110 S.Ct. 2176 , 109 L.Ed.2d 505 (1990); Breidor v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1134, 1139 (3d Cir.1984) (“Lhjelpfulness is the touchstone of Rule 702”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
37 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 783, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,542 William Dunn Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. v. Hovic Amerada Hess Corp. Keene Corporation v. The Litwin Corporation Litwin Panamerican Borinquen Insulation Co. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation
We "will interpret possible helpfulness to the trier of fact broadly and will favor admissibility in doubtful cases." Linkstrom, 883 F.2d at 270 ; see also American Technology Resources v. United States, 893 F.2d 651, 655 (3d Cir.) (helpfulness standard interpreted broadly), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 933 , 110 S.Ct. 2176 , 109 L.Ed.2d 505 (1990); Breidor v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1134, 1139 (3d Cir.1984) ("[h]elpfulness is the touchstone of Rule 702"). 24 We have previously expressed our view that in most cases " '[t]he jury is intelligent enough, aided by counsel, to ignore what is unhel…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maria Graciela RAMIREZ
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 89-1592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1990.
110 S. Ct. 2176
Published
Citer courts: D. South Dakota (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Denied.