green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.8 score
“conviction may be based solely upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice if the testimony is not incredible or otherwise insubstantial on its face”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
U.S. v. Casel
conviction may be based solely upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice if the testimony is not incredible or otherwise insubstantial on its face
discussed
Cited "see"
Lane v. Cole
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598 , 606 & n. 18 (3d Cir.1990)(allegation that defendants threatened plaintiff with physical injury and destruction of business to extort money from him sufficient to state emotional distress claim), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Williams v. Guzzardi, 875 F.2d 46, 52 (3d Cir.1989); (eviction of tenant by landlord who tricked tenant into giving up his keys and gave him no opportunity to remove *407 his belongings which were thrown into the street sufficient to sustain intentional infliction claim); Pryor v. Mercy Cath.
cited
Cited "see"
Hall v. Doering
See O’Malley v. O’Neill, 887 F.2d 1557 1561 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic Of Panama v. Bcci Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.
See O'Malley v. O'Neill, 887 F.2d 1557, 1559 (11th Cir.1989) (upholding dismissal of RICO conspiracy claim because "no facts [were] alleged that would indicate that [defendants] were willing participants in a conspiracy"), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 (1991); Davidson v. Wilson, 763 F.Supp. 1470 , 1472 n. 8 (D.Minn.1991) (alleging mere affiliation between corporate defendants is insufficient to establish agreement under § 1962(d)), aff'd, 973 F.2d 1391 (8th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic of Panama v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.
See O’Malley v. O’Neill, 887 F.2d 1557, 1559 (11th Cir.1989) (upholding dismissal of RICO conspiracy claim because “no facts [were] alleged that would indicate that [defendants] were willing participants in a conspiracy”), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 (1991); Davidson v. Wilson, 763 F.Supp. 1470 , 1472 n. 8 (D.Minn.1991) (alleging mere affiliation between corporate defendants is insufficient to establish agreement under § 1962(d)), aff'd, 973 F.2d 1391 (8th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Skeete v. IVF America, Inc.
See O'Malley v. O’Neill, 887 F.2d 1557, 1561 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990) (citing Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., Inc., 473 U.S. 479, 497 , 105 S.Ct. 3275, 3285 , 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985)); Burdick v. American Express Co., 865 F.2d 527, 529 (2d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ascolese v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 606 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990) (concluding that, despite some questions on this point, Pennsylvania's highest court is likely to recognize the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress). 31 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McKinney
See United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1326 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert D. Schulman, T/a Maxi's Express v. J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. Widener Funding Corp., Inc.
(2×)
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601-02 (3d Cir.) (citing Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co., 488 Pa. 198 , 412 A.2d 466, 471 (1979)), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990). .
cited
Cited "see"
Schulman v. J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgmt. Inc.
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601-02 (3d Cir.) (citing Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co., 412 A.2d 466, 471 (Pa. 1979)), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 (1990). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Peoples Mortgage Co. v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
Under Pennsylvania law, a plaintiff asserting intentional interference with prospective contractual relations must prove the following elements: “(1) a prospective contractual relationship; (2) the purpose or intent to harm plaintiff by preventing the relationship from occurring; (3) the absence of privilege or justification on the part of the defendant; and (4) occurrence of actual damage.” Advent Systems Ltd. v. Unisys Corp., 925 F.2d 670, 673 (3d Cir.1991); accord, Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601-02 (3d Cir.) (citing Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co., 488 Pa. 198 , 412 A.2d 466, 47…
cited
Cited "see"
Buchanan v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Accord Hemmerle v. Bramalea, Inc., 547 So.2d 203 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), review denied, 558 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schulman v. J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc.
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601-02 (3d Cir.), (citing Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co., 488 Pa. 198 , 412 A.2d 466, 471 (1979)), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Windsor Securities, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990) (alleged conduct of defendant in maliciously filing involuntary bankruptcy petition against plaintiff without probable cause stated cause of action for improper interference with contract as well as intentional infliction of emotional distress); Roe v. Operation Rescue, 710 F.Supp. 577 (E.D.Pa.1989), modified, 919 F.2d 857 (3d Cir.1990) (defendants’ conduct in blockading abortion clinics constituted improper interference as well as trespass and violation of patients’ civil rig…
discussed
Cited "see"
Windsor Securities, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance Company
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990) (alleged conduct of defendant in maliciously filing involuntary bankruptcy petition against plaintiff without probable cause stated cause of action for improper interference with contract as well as intentional infliction of emotional distress); Roe v. Operation Rescue, 710 F.Supp. 577 (E.D.Pa.1989), modified, 919 F.2d 857 (3d Cir.1990) (defendants' conduct in blockading abortion clinics constituted improper interference as well as trespass and violation of patients' civil rights)…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Filemon Sotelo Sanchez, Jose Angel Naegele, and Rebeca Portillo Brito, United States of America v. Ricardo Portillo Brito
See United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1325 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990) (citing F.R.App.P. 28(a)(4)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mansmann v. Tuman
Corbett, 934 F.Supp. at 683 ; see, e.g., Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 606 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Clark v. Falls Twp., 890 F.2d 611 , 623 (3d Cir.1989); Williams v. Guzzardi, 875 F.2d 46, 51 (3d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Westinghouse Securities Litigation. Margaret Alessi, Gloria Bertinato, Michael C. Christner, Anna Marie Eroshevich, Toby Feuer, Kanwal K. Gupta, M.D., Matthew Harlib, Stanley Hershfang, Arnold M. Jacob, Louise Jacob, David Jaroslawicz, David Kirschner, Nathan Kleinhandler, Gerry Krim, Peter Lagorio, Nelson Lovins, Donald McLennan Jacob Joseph Miller, Dr. Alexander Miller, Thomas Mitchell, Edward Murabito, Michael E. Nogay, Joseph Raschak, Richard Schwartzchild, Dr. Michael Slavin, Dr. Michael Solomon, Selma Solomon, Spring Creek Cardiomedical Center, Ruth Stepak, Jim Thompson, Patricia J. Vanartsdalen, Albert Zucker
See, e.g., Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Elfman Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 567 F.2d 1252, 1253 (3d Cir.1977) ("the appeal from a final judgment draws in question all prior non-final orders and rulings which produced the judgment") (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Westinghouse Securities Litigation
See, e.g., Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Elfman Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 567 F.2d 1252, 1253 (3d Cir.1977) (“the appeal from a final judgment draws in question all prior non-final orders and rulings which produced the judgment”) (citation omitted).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Carlough v. Amchem Products, Inc.
See, e.g., Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 606 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Howard T. Kreisner v. City of San Diego
(4×)
Compare Kaplan v. City of Burlington, 891 F.2d 1024 (2d Cir.1989) (holding that permitting private display of menorah in City Hall Park violated Establishment Clause), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2619 , 110 L.Ed.2d 640 (1990), with McCreary v. Stone, 739 F.2d 716 (2d Cir.1984) (holding that village's grant of a permit allowing private group to display creche in public park did not violate Establishment Clause), aff'd by an equally divided court sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Heriberto Ruiz, A/K/A Echeverry, Jorge Marisio-Gonzalez and Valentin Montero
See, e.g., United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1322 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Howard T. Kreisner v. City of San Diego
(4×)
Compare Kaplan v. City of Burlington, 891 F.2d 1024 (2d Cir.1989) (holding that permitting private display of menorah in City Hall Park violated Establishment Clause), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2619 , 110 L.Ed.2d 640 (1990), with McCreary v. Stone, 739 F.2d 716 (2d Cir.1984) (holding that village’s grant of a permit allowing private group to display creche in public park did not violate Establishment Clause), affd by an equally divided court sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Douglas D. Green, A/K/A Doug Green
See Fagan, supra; Johnson, supra; see also, United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313, 1325 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2621 , 110 L.Ed.2d 642 (1990) (citing F.R.App.P. 28(a)(4)).
Raft, aka Rafatdjah
v.
California
v.
California
No. 89-1619.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 11, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.