green
Positive treatment
8.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lane v. Cole
(2×)
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598 , 606 & n. 18 (3d Cir.1990)(allegation that defendants threatened plaintiff with physical injury and destruction of business to extort money from him sufficient to state emotional distress claim), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Williams v. Guzzardi, 875 F.2d 46, 52 (3d Cir.1989); (eviction of tenant by landlord who tricked tenant into giving up his keys and gave him no opportunity to remove *407 his belongings which were thrown into the street sufficient to sustain intentional infliction claim); Pryor v. Mercy Cath.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. Doering
(2×)
See O’Malley v. O’Neill, 887 F.2d 1557 1561 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic of Panama v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.
See O’Malley v. O’Neill, 887 F.2d 1557, 1559 (11th Cir.1989) (upholding dismissal of RICO conspiracy claim because “no facts [were] alleged that would indicate that [defendants] were willing participants in a conspiracy”), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 (1991); Davidson v. Wilson, 763 F.Supp. 1470 , 1472 n. 8 (D.Minn.1991) (alleging mere affiliation between corporate defendants is insufficient to establish agreement under § 1962(d)), aff'd, 973 F.2d 1391 (8th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic Of Panama v. Bcci Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.
See O'Malley v. O'Neill, 887 F.2d 1557, 1559 (11th Cir.1989) (upholding dismissal of RICO conspiracy claim because "no facts [were] alleged that would indicate that [defendants] were willing participants in a conspiracy"), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 (1991); Davidson v. Wilson, 763 F.Supp. 1470 , 1472 n. 8 (D.Minn.1991) (alleging mere affiliation between corporate defendants is insufficient to establish agreement under § 1962(d)), aff'd, 973 F.2d 1391 (8th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Skeete v. IVF America, Inc.
(2×)
See O'Malley v. O’Neill, 887 F.2d 1557, 1561 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990) (citing Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., Inc., 473 U.S. 479, 497 , 105 S.Ct. 3275, 3285 , 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985)); Burdick v. American Express Co., 865 F.2d 527, 529 (2d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ascolese v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
(2×)
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 606 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990) (concluding that, despite some questions on this point, Pennsylvania's highest court is likely to recognize the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress). 31 .
examined
Cited "see"
Robert D. Schulman, T/a Maxi's Express v. J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. Widener Funding Corp., Inc.
(4×)
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601-02 (3d Cir.) (citing Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co., 488 Pa. 198 , 412 A.2d 466, 471 (1979)), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990) 17 We believe there is a genuine issue of fact as to whether there was a reasonable probability of Schulman's obtaining a lease absent the mortgagee's interference.
discussed
Cited "see"
Peoples Mortgage Co. v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
(2×)
Under Pennsylvania law, a plaintiff asserting intentional interference with prospective contractual relations must prove the following elements: “(1) a prospective contractual relationship; (2) the purpose or intent to harm plaintiff by preventing the relationship from occurring; (3) the absence of privilege or justification on the part of the defendant; and (4) occurrence of actual damage.” Advent Systems Ltd. v. Unisys Corp., 925 F.2d 670, 673 (3d Cir.1991); accord, Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601-02 (3d Cir.) (citing Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co., 488 Pa. 198 , 412 A.2d 466, 47…
discussed
Cited "see"
Buchanan v. Allstate Ins. Co.
(2×)
Accord Hemmerle v. Bramalea, Inc., 547 So.2d 203 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), review denied, 558 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schulman v. J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc.
(2×)
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601-02 (3d Cir.), (citing Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co., 488 Pa. 198 , 412 A.2d 466, 471 (1979)), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Windsor Securities, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance Company
(2×)
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990) (alleged conduct of defendant in maliciously filing involuntary bankruptcy petition against plaintiff without probable cause stated cause of action for improper interference with contract as well as intentional infliction of emotional distress); Roe v. Operation Rescue, 710 F.Supp. 577 (E.D.Pa.1989), modified, 919 F.2d 857 (3d Cir.1990) (defendants' conduct in blockading abortion clinics constituted improper interference as well as trespass and violation of patients' civil rights)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Windsor Securities, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance
(2×)
See Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990) (alleged conduct of defendant in maliciously filing involuntary bankruptcy petition against plaintiff without probable cause stated cause of action for improper interference with contract as well as intentional infliction of emotional distress); Roe v. Operation Rescue, 710 F.Supp. 577 (E.D.Pa.1989), modified, 919 F.2d 857 (3d Cir.1990) (defendants’ conduct in blockading abortion clinics constituted improper interference as well as trespass and violation of patients’ civil rig…
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanley J. Stewart v. Parish of Jefferson
(2×)
See Kirkland v. Northside Independent School Dist., 890 F.2d 794, 798 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Terrell v. University of Texas System Police, 792 F.2d 1360 , 1362 n. 2 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1064 , 107 S.Ct. 948 , 93 L.Ed.2d 997 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
R.R. Brittingham, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Mobil Corporation and Mobil Oil Corporation D/B/A Mobil Chemical Company, Inc. R.R. Brittingham, in 90-1989. Matthew D. Roazen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Mobil Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation D/B/A Mobil Chemical Company Matthew D. Roazen, in 91-1019. Jack Dorf, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Mobil Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation D/B/A Mobil Chemical Company Jack Dorf, in 91-1025. Beth Dunnington, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Mobil Corporation Beth Dunnington, in 91-1034. S.A. Poncet-Pitkow, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Mobil Corporation S.A. Poncet-Pitkow, in 91-1035. Leo Geiger, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Mobil Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation D/B/A Mobil Chemical Company, Inc. Leo Geiger, in 91-1041
(2×)
See O'Malley v. O'Neill, 887 F.2d 1557, 1561 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Zervas v. Faulkner, 861 F.2d 823, 834-35 (5th Cir.1988); Brandenburg v. Seidel, 859 F.2d 1179, 1189 (4th Cir.1988); Sperber v. Boesky, 849 F.2d 60, 64-65 (2d Cir.1988); Haroco, Inc. v. American Nat'l Bank and Trust Co., 747 F.2d 384, 398 (7th Cir.1984), aff'd, 473 U.S. 606 , 105 S.Ct. 3291 , 87 L.Ed.2d 437 (1985) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brittingham v. Mobil Corp.
(2×)
See O’Malley v. O’Neill, 887 F.2d 1557, 1561 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Zervas v. Faulkner, 861 F.2d 823, 834-35 (5th Cir.1988); Brandenburg v. Seidel, 859 F.2d 1179, 1189 (4th Cir.1988); Sperber v. Boesky, 849 F.2d 60, 64-65 (2d Cir.1988); Haroco, Inc. v. American Nat’l Bank and Trust Co., 747 F.2d 384, 398 (7th Cir.1984), aff’d, 473 U.S. 606 , 105 S.Ct. 3291 , 87 L.Ed.2d 437 (1985) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Centerpoint Bank
(2×)
See Pujol, supra. The Eleventh Circuit addressed alleged predicate acts of mail fraud in O’Malley v. O’Neill, 887 F.2d 1557 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Foreman v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
(2×)
See O'Malley v. O'Neill, 887 F.2d 1557 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Elliott v. Foufas, 867 F.2d 877, 880 (5th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
(2×)
Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 766 (1979); see Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin and Creskoff v. Epstein, 482 Pa. 416 , 393 A.2d 1175, 1183 (1978), appeal dismissed, 442 U.S. 907 , 99 S.Ct. 2817 , 61 L.Ed.2d 272 (1979). 65 Under Pennsylvania law, in order to establish a claim for tortious interference with an prospective contractual relations, a plaintiff must show: “(1) a prospective contractual relation; (2) the purpose or intent to harm the plaintiff by preventing the relation f…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mansmann v. Tuman
(2×)
Corbett, 934 F.Supp. at 683 ; see, e.g., Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 606 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Clark v. Falls Twp., 890 F.2d 611 , 623 (3d Cir.1989); Williams v. Guzzardi, 875 F.2d 46, 51 (3d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Westinghouse Securities Litigation
(2×)
See, e.g., Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Elfman Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 567 F.2d 1252, 1253 (3d Cir.1977) (“the appeal from a final judgment draws in question all prior non-final orders and rulings which produced the judgment”) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Westinghouse Securities Litigation. Margaret Alessi, Gloria Bertinato, Michael C. Christner, Anna Marie Eroshevich, Toby Feuer, Kanwal K. Gupta, M.D., Matthew Harlib, Stanley Hershfang, Arnold M. Jacob, Louise Jacob, David Jaroslawicz, David Kirschner, Nathan Kleinhandler, Gerry Krim, Peter Lagorio, Nelson Lovins, Donald McLennan Jacob Joseph Miller, Dr. Alexander Miller, Thomas Mitchell, Edward Murabito, Michael E. Nogay, Joseph Raschak, Richard Schwartzchild, Dr. Michael Slavin, Dr. Michael Solomon, Selma Solomon, Spring Creek Cardiomedical Center, Ruth Stepak, Jim Thompson, Patricia J. Vanartsdalen, Albert Zucker
(2×)
See, e.g., Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 601 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990); Elfman Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 567 F.2d 1252, 1253 (3d Cir.1977) ("the appeal from a final judgment draws in question all prior non-final orders and rulings which produced the judgment") (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carlough v. Amchem Products, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Silver v. Mendel, 894 F.2d 598, 606 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Browning Avenue Realty Corp. v. Rosenshein
(2×)
See Hecht, 897 F.2d at 21 ; see also O’Mally v. O’Neill, 887 F.2d 1557, 1561 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2620 , 110 L.Ed.2d 641 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
M. Mark MENDEL
v.
Marc I. SILVER
v.
Marc I. SILVER
No. 89-1645.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 11, 1990.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Denied.