green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Coppola v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc.
(2×)
See Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., 541 So. 2d 182 , 188 n.17 (La.) (Wixom “reflects] an anomalous and overly restrictive view of concurrent jurisdiction”), cert. dismissed, 492 U.S. 939 , 110 S. Ct. 30 , 106 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State of Arizona v. Mark Anthony Cons
See State v. Canez, 202 Ariz. 133, ¶ 80 , 42 P.3d 5 64, 588 (2002) (“[W]hatever the impact of Apprendi on Walton [v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 63 9, 110 S. Ct. 30 47, 111 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Monroe
v.
Butler, Warden
v.
Butler, Warden
No. 89-195.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 13, 1989.
Published
Crim. Dist. Ct., Parish of Orleans, La. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.