green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
“a law is not vague simply because it requires conformity to an imprecise normative standard”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brown v. Ashton
a law is not vague simply because it requires conformity to an imprecise normative standard
cited
Cited "see"
McCree v. State
See Eanes v. State, 318 Md. 436, 445 , 569 A.2d 604 , cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3218 , 110 L.Ed.2d 665 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patistas v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222 , 237 [1974]; see Matter of DeBonis v Corbisiero, 155 AD2d 299 , 302 [1989], lv denied 75 NY2d 709 [1990], cert denied 496 US 938 [1990]; see generally Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892, 894 [2001]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanjour v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990); Bresgal v. Brock, 843 F.2d 1163, 1170-71 (9th Cir.1987); Professional Ass’n of College Educators v. El Paso County Community College Dist., 730 F.2d 258, 274 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984); Evans v. Harnett County Bd. of Educ., 684 F.2d 304, 306 (4th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Brescher v. Pirez
See Hamm v. Powell, 874 F.2d 766 *374 (11th Cir.1989), modified on other grounds on reh'g in part, 893 F.2d 293 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3218 , 110 L.Ed.2d 665 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guckenberger v. Boston University
See Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 351 (1st Cir.1989) (holding that it was error to permit the speeches of a university president to be admitted as evidence of discriminatory animus because of the “chilling effect that admission of such remarks could have on academic freedom”), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990); cf. Sweezy v. State of N.H., 354 U.S. 234, 250 , 77 S.Ct. 1203, 1211 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1957) (concluding that “to impose any straitjaeket upon the intellectual leaders in any colleges and universities would imperil the future o…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ernest Smith Jimmy Rudd v. Arkansas Department of Correction A.L. Lockhart, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction Larry Norris, Acting Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction Willis H. Sargent, Warden of the Cummins Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction A.J. Hall, Major, Chief of Security R.R. Wood, Lieutenant, Shift Supervisor J. Cleveland, Guard John Hood, Officer James Banks, Classification and Assignment Officer, Ron Smyers, Medical Services Administrator John Does, I-X, Dale Reed, Warden, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Linda C. Smith, Administratrix of the Estate of John E. Stewart v. Arkansas Department of Correction A.L. Lockhart, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry Norris, Acting Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction Willis H. Sargent, Warden of the Cummins Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction A.J. Hall, Major, Chief of Security R.R. Wood, Lieutenant, Shift Supervisor J. Cleveland, Guard John Hood, Officer, James Banks, Classification and Assignment Officer Ron Smyers, Medical Services Administrator John Does, I-X
Butler v. Dowd, 979 F.2d 661, 674 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 930 , 113 S.Ct. 2395 , 124 L.Ed.2d 297 (1993); see Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 361 (1st Cir.1989) ("[A]n injunction is not necessarily made overbroad by extending benefit or protection to persons other than prevailing parties in a lawsuit--even if it is not a class action--if such breadth is necessary to give prevailing parties the relief to which they are entitled.") (internal quotations and alterations omitted), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990). 35 In Lewis, the S…
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Arkansas Department of Correction
Butler v. Dowd, 979 F.2d 661, 674 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 930 , 113 S.Ct. 2395 , 124 L.Ed.2d 297 (1993); see Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 361 (1st Cir.1989) (“[A]n injunction is not necessarily made overbroad by extending benefit or protection to persons other than prevailing parties in a lawsuit — even if it is not a class action — if such breadth is necessary to give prevailing parties the relief to which they are entitled.”) (internal quotations and alterations omitted), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Sherman Rutledge v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director Grant Woods, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
See id. 5 The record supports the conclusion that Rutledge's statements were freely and voluntarily given.
cited
Cited "see"
Tidewater/Havre De Grace, Inc. v. Mayor of Havre De Grace
See Eanes v. State, 318 Md. 436, 459 , 569 A.2d 604, 615 , cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3218 , 110 L.Ed.2d 665 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Judy Breitman v. May Company California, a Division of the May Department Stores Company
See Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph, Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. *564 937, 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tidewater/Havre De Grace, Inc. v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF GRACE
See Eanes v. State, 318 Md. 436, 459 , 569 A.2d 604 , cert. den., 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3218 , 110 L.Ed.2d 665 (1990) (tests for vagueness based on fourteenth amendment due process or fairness concerns). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Lee Webster
The pivotal question ... is whether the defendant's will was overborne when the defendant confessed." Id. at 1031 (citations omitted); accord Medeiros v. Shimoda, 889 F.2d 819, 823 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 (1990). 7 "An evidentiary hearing on a motion to suppress ordinarily is required if 'the moving papers are sufficiently definite, specific, detailed, and nonconjectural to enable the court to conclude that contested issues of fact going to the validity of the search are in question.' " United States v. Licavoli, 604 F.2d 613, 621 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 935 (1980) (q…
examined
Cited "see"
Richard Graff v. City of Chicago, an Illinois Corporation
(4×)
See Norton v. Nicholson, 187 Ill.App.3d 1046 , 135 Ill.Dec. 485, 491 , 543 N.E.2d 1053, 1059 (1989), appeal denied, 129 Ill.2d 565 , 140 Ill.Dec. 673 , 550 N.E.2d 558 , cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 665 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Preston Eccles Locke v. Warden Borg
See Medeiros v. Shimoda, 889 F.2d 819, 822 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 (1990). 7 Here, Locke had been released on his own recognizance and voluntarily accompanied an officer to the district attorney's office to reveal the location of Borrella's body.
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Cross-Plaintiff v. Shearson-American Express, Inc., Cross-Defendants, Banco Cooperativo De Puerto Rico, Intervenor, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Cross-Plaintiff v. Shearson-American Express, Inc., Cross-Defendants, Prudential Bache Securities, Inc., Intervenor
See Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 352 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Shearson-American Express, Inc.
See Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 352 (1st Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Beaufort v. Baker
See Eanes v. State of Maryland, 318 Md. 436 , 569 A. (2d) 604 (1990), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3218 , 110 L.Ed. (2d) 665 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael J. Valdez
See Medeiros v. Shimoda, 889 F.2d 819, 822 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aunyx Corporation v. Canon U.S.A., Incorporated
See Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 352 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990) (holding that potential issues not supported by argument in appellant’s brief are deemed abandoned); Zanditon v. Feinstein, 849 F.2d 692, 702 (1st Cir.1988) (stating that a grant of summary judgment not timely objected to will not be reviewed on appeal); Clauson v. Smith, 823 F.2d 660, 666 (1st Cir.1987) (“In the absence of extraordinary circumstances, ... we have regularly declined to consider points which were not seasonably advanced below.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Bob L. Franklin v. Clark County Managers Office Las Vegas District, Nevada Bureau of Land Management
See Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Tourist Village Motel, Inc. v. Massachusetts Engineering Co.
See Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 357 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Frank R. Borders v. Mark Allan Alan Traywick
See id. 3 * Background 4 Defendant Mark Allan is a forensic therapist and a state employee at Western State Hospital.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carolyn M. GALLAGHER, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. WILTON ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant, Appellant
See Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 674 F.Supp. 393, 395 (D.Mass.1987), aff'd in relevant part, 891 F.2d 337 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990); Egger v. Local 276, Plumbers & Pipefitters Union, 644 F.Supp. 795, 805 (D.Mass.1986); College-Town, Div. of Interco, Inc. v. Massachusetts Comm’n Against Discrimination, 400 Mass. 156 , 508 N.E.2d 587, 594-95 (1987); Bournewood Hosp., Inc. v. Massachusetts Comm’n Against Discrimination, 371 Mass. 303 , 358 N.E.2d 235 , 241-43 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bhanuprsad Joshi v. Lockheed Engineering, and Management Service Company, Inc.
See Vasconcelos v. Meese, 907 F.2d 111, 112 (9th Cir.1990) (citing Kruso v. ITT Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990)). 4 Joshi also contends that the district court erred in dismissing his claims for compensatory damages.
cited
Cited "see"
Elliott Williams v. Jack Owens, Shelby County Health Care Corporation, D/B/A Regional Medical Center at Memphis, and as the Med
See Brown v. Trustees of Boston University, 891 F.2d 337, 361 (1st Cir.1989) (citations and quotations omitted), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tino Villanueva v. Wellesley College
See Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 345-46 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990); Kumar, 774 F.2d at 10-11 ; Kumar, 774 F.2d at 12 (Campbell, J., concurring); Sweeney v. Board of Trustees of Keene State College, 569 F.2d 169, 175-76 (1st Cir.), rev’d on other grounds, 439 U.S. 24 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Patrice v. Murphy
See, e.g., Medeiros v. Shimoda, 889 6F.2d 819, 824 (9th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3219 , 110 L.Ed.2d 666 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cassidy v. Salt Lake County Fire Civil Service Council
(2×)
See, e.g., Norton v. Nicholson, 187 Ill.App.3d 1046 , 135 Ill.Dec. 485 , 543 N.E.2d 1053, 1061 (1989)(stating First Amendment “does not require [the fire department to] tolerate action which it reasonably believed would disrupt its operations, undermine the authority of its Fire Chief and destroy working relationships within the Department”), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 665 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Boyd Dean Weekley
See also Medeiros v. Shimoda, 889 F.2d 819, 824 (9th Cir.1989) (a court must consider the totality of the circumstances when determining voluntariness), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3219 , 110 L.Ed.2d 666 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dowdell v. Chapman
However, both the Supreme Court of the United States and the Eleventh Circuit have held that all claims “involving allegations of the use of excessive force in an arrest, an investigatory stop, or any other seizure, should be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment” rather than under the substantive due process standard of the Fourteenth Amendment. 5 Tinney v. Shores, 77 F.3d 378, 381 (11th Cir.1996) (summarizing Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 , 109 S.Ct. 1865 , 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989)); see also Hamm v. Powell, 893 F.2d 293, 294 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3218 , 110 *5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lee v. Rapid City Area School District, No. 51-4
Stores, 672 F.2d 1312 (9th Cir.1982), cert. den., 459 U.S. 859 , 103 S.Ct. 131 , 74 L.Ed.2d 113 (1982); Fellows v. Medford Corp., 431 F.Supp. 199 (D.Ore.1977); Rechsteiner v. Madison Fund Inc., 75 F.R.D. 499 (D.Del.1977); see also Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990) (state contract and federal discrimination claims joined).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leroy Alexander v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation James Jeros Steven Brechtelsbauer Jane Doe
See also Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1426 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990), stating: [N]one of the individual defendants are alleged to have done anything wrongful except to cause the corporate defendants to act in an allegedly wrongful manner.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Price v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Eanes v. State, 318 Md. 436 , 569 A.2d 604 (1990), cert, denied, 496 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 3218 , 110 L.Ed.2d 665 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Presidio Investments, Ltd.
See also Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1425 (9th Cir.1989) (Section 1016(a) of the Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act of 1988 providing that the naming of Doe defendants no longer defeats diversity jurisdiction is procedural and therefore applies to cases pending on the effective date), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990); Delta Computer Corp. v. Samsung Semiconductor & Telecommunications Co., 879 F.2d 662 (9th Cir.1989) (New section of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 15 , providing that an appeal could…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Presidio Investments, Ltd., Edward Sandquist v. Janet Blair, Applicant in Intervention-Appellant. United States of America v. Presidio Investments, Ltd., Edward Sandquist v. Janet Blair, Applicant in Intervention-Appellant
See also Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1425 (9th Cir.1989) (Section 1016(a) of the Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act of 1988 providing that the naming of Doe defendants no longer defeats diversity jurisdiction is procedural and therefore applies to cases pending on the effective date), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990); Delta Computer Corp. v. Samsung Semiconductor & Telecommunications Co., 879 F.2d 662 (9th Cir.1989) (New section of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ponce Federal Bank, F.S.B. v. The Vessel \Lady Abby\"
See, e.g., Brown v. Trustees of Boston University, 891 F.2d 337, 355-56 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990); Rodriguez v. Comas, 888 F.2d 899, 903-05 (1st Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dickinson v. Duck (In Re Borelli)
See also Kruso v. Int’l Telephone and Telegraph, 872 F.2d 1416 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.— , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990) (retroactive application of amendments to section 1016(a) was not unjust).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michigan
v.
Grzegorczyk
v.
Grzegorczyk
No. 89-1685.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 18, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (1)
Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.