green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1991 ·
…since the defendant had an opportunity to address the court before sentencing during his allocution and has a right to appeal his sentence, he has not been harmed by the trial court's lack of notice.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Cook
But see State v. Bullock, 791 P.2d 155, 159 (Utah 1989) (stating that plain error rule, while existing to protect defendants from less-than-perfect counsel, “is in no way implicated if defense counsel consciously elects to permit evidence to be admitted as part of a defense strategy rather than through inadvertence or neglect”), cert, denied, 497 U.S. 1024 , 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990). 3 Although the Eldredge court determined that the error was not plain or obvious to the trial court, the court’s reasoning strongly impacts the *916 present case.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Dennis L. Astorri
(2×)
since the defendant had an opportunity to address the court before sentencing during his allocution and has a right to appeal his sentence, he has not been harmed by the trial court's lack of notice.
cited
Cited "see"
Bullock v. Carver
See Bullock v. Utah, 497 U.S. 1024 , 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Winward
See State v. Bullock, 791 P.2d 155, 158-59 (Utah 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1024 , 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Carter v. Beverly Hills Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 884 F.2d 1186, 1188-90 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1024 , 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Camacho v. Mancuso
See Carter, v. Beverly Hills Sav. and Loan Ass’n, 884 F.2d 1186, 1191 (9th Cir.1989) (no basis for dismissal under 41(a)(l)(ii) where “the parties did not move for or stipulate to dismissal, either orally or in writing”), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1024 , 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990); McCallr-Bey, 777 F.2d at 1185 (“Rule 41(a)(1)(h) requires that the stipulation be filed in court....”); see also Orsini v. Kugel, 9 F.3d 1042, 1045 (2d Cir. 1993) (indicating that “[t]he plain language of [Rule 41(a)(l)(ii) ] requires that the stipulation be filed in order to effectuate a volun…
discussed
Cited "see"
Camacho v. Mancuso
See Carter v. Beverly Hills Sav. and Loan Ass'n, 884 F.2d 1186, 1191 (9th Cir.1989) (no basis for dismissal under 41(a)(1)(ii) where "the parties did not move for or stipulate to dismissal, either orally or in writing"), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1024 , 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990); McCall-Bey, 777 F.2d at 1185 ("Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) requires that the stipulation be filed in court...."); see also Orsini v. Kugel, 9 F.3d 1042, 1045 (2d Cir.1993) (indicating that "[t]he plain language of [Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) ] requires that the stipulation be filed in order to effectuate a voluntary dismissal…
discussed
Cited "see"
Fernandez v. Cook
See State v. Anderson, 789 P.2d 27, 29 (Utah 1990) (citing State v. Van Matre, 777 P.2d 459, 462 (Utah 1989)). [29] Tyler, 850 P.2d at 1256 (citing State v. Wood, 648 P.2d 71 , 91 (Utah), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 988 , 103 S.Ct. 341 , 74 L.Ed.2d 383 (1982)). [30] Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. at 2065 . [31] Tyler, 850 P.2d at 1256 (citing State v. Sammons, 156 Ariz. 51 , 749 P.2d 1372, 1377 (1988)). [32] State v. Speer, 750 P.2d 186, 191 (Utah 1988). [33] Id. [34] See, e.g., Strickland, 466 U.S. at 691 , 104 S.Ct. at 2066 . [35] See State v. Malmrose, 649 P.2d 56, 58 (Utah 1982) (quoti…
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Dunn
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See State v. Bullock, 791 P.2d 155, 160 (Utah), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1024 , 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1989); State v. Carter, 776 P.2d 886, 894 (Utah *1226 1989); State v. Julian, 771 P.2d 1061, 1063-64 (Utah 1989); State v. Medina, 738 P.2d 1021, 1023-24 (Utah 1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hananya Amir v. William H. Reed, Director of the Contract Audit Agency
See Carter v. Beverly Hills Savings and Loan Assn., 884 F.2d 1186, 1190-91 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3270 (1990); Beaudry Motor Co. v. Abko Properties, 780 F.2d 751 , 754-56 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 825 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bert E. Ingram v. Acands, Inc. Fibreboard Corp., and Owens-Illinois, Inc., Beulah M. Becker, Personal Representative of the Estate of Alfred E. Becker v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., Beulah M. Becker, Personal Representative of the Estate of Alfred E. Becker v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., Bert E. Ingram v. Acands, Inc. Fibreboard Corp., and Owens-Illinois, Inc., Bert E. Ingram v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corporation
See Carter v. Beverly Hills Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 884 F.2d 1186 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990); Beaudry, 780 F.2d 751 ; Calhoun v. United States, 647 F.2d 6 (9th Cir.1981), overruled on other grounds, Acosta v. Louisiana Dep't of Health & Human Res., 478 U.S. 251 , 106 S.Ct. 2876 , 92 L.Ed.2d 192 (1986). 6 33 In Calhoun, in the portion that was not overruled by Acosta, we held that a document entitled "Minutes of the Court" did not constitute a dispositive order for purposes of Fed.R.App.P. 4(a).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ingram v. Acands, Inc.
See Carter v. Beverly Hills Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 884 F.2d 1186 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990); Beaudry, 780 F.2d 751 ; Calhoun v. United States, 647 F.2d 6 (9th Cir.1981), overruled on other grounds, Acosta v. Louisiana Dep’t of Health & Human Res., 478 U.S. 251 , 106 S.Ct. 2876 , 92 L.Ed.2d 192 (1986). 6 In Calhoun , in the portion that was not overruled by Acosta, we held that a document entitled “Minutes of the Court” did not constitute a dispositive order for purposes of Fed.R.App.P. 4(a).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See State v. Bullock, 791 P.2d 155, 159 (Utah 1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990); State v. Buel, 700 P.2d 701, 703 (Utah 1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Wynn Oil Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. American Way Service Corporation, and Thomas A. Warmus, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees
See Endsley v. Young (In re Young), 872 F.2d 176, 177 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Palinkas, United States of America v. Kenneth Michael Kochekian
See United States v. Burns, 893 F.2d 1343, 1346 (D.C.Cir.), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990) (Supreme Court granted certiorari on a different issue). 10 The “on-going nature” cited by the district court does not refer to the planning necessary, but instead, as appellant himself noted, to the fraudulent activity that occurred on a daily basis.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tennyson Ogbeide, A/K/A Eddy Feisel
See United States v. Burns, 893 F.2d 1343, 1345 (D.C.Cir.), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990); accord United States v. Hawkins, 901 F.2d 863, 864 (10th Cir.1990); United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 49 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mccalden v. California Library Association
See also Carter v. Beverly Hills Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 884 F.2d 1186 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990) (civil minutes entered in docket book do not constitute final judgment unless separate order filed and all formalities observed). 19 The district court's various orders did not constitute an "entry of judgment" in this case, because no separate document of judgment was entered.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mccalden v. California Library Association
See also Carter v. Beverly Hills Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 884 F.2d 1186 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990) (civil minutes entered in docket book do not constitute final judgment unless separate order filed and all formalities observed). 13 The district court's various orders did not constitute an "entry of judgment" in this case, because no separate document of judgment was entered.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCalden v. California Library Ass'n
See also Carter v. Beverly Hills Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 884 F.2d 1186 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990) (civil minutes entered in docket book do not constitute final judgment unless separate order filed and all formalities observed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCalden v. California Library Ass'n
See also Carter v. Beverly Hills Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 884 F.2d 1186 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990) (civil minutes entered in docket book do not constitute final judgment unless separate order filed and all formalities observed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Troy R. Singleton
See, e.g., United States v. Burns, 893 F.2d 1343, 1347 (D.C.Cir.) (significant disruption of government function when defendant used unwitting government personnel to divert funds), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3270 , 111 L.Ed.2d 780 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Parker
v.
Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
v.
Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
No. 89-5961.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.