green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
“it is ... beyond dispute that a jury may find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt from circumstantial evidence”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Duran v. Pepe
it is ... beyond dispute that a jury may find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt from circumstantial evidence
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Collins
See 874 F.2d at 247 n. 7. make the issue of the defendant's sanity so clear,[11] it is difficult to distill from that case a bright line test for determining what constitutes a sufficient showing." Volanty v. Lynaugh, 874 F.2d 243, 245 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 955 , 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas York
See United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989); United States v. Candoli, 870 F.2d 496 (9th Cir. 1989). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hector Martin Ramos
See United States v. Marco L., 868 F.2d 1121, 1125 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Smith, Regina Smith and Gary King, Julia Thom
In our evaluation of compelling prejudice, we consider all the circumstances of a particular case “to determine whether the court’s instructions sufficiently enabled the jurors to keep separate the evidence as relevant to each defendant.” Harris, 908 F.2d at 736-37 ; see United States v. Roper, 874 F.2d 782, 789 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 189 , 107 L.Ed.2d 144 , — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John J. Maguire, United States v. Thomas M. Kavanagh, United States v. Robert A. Hickey
See United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188, 195 (1st Cir.) (disavowing suggestivity of identification when witness was “experienced police officer” viewing suspect twice in “complete daylight”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Pungitore, Jr., in No. 89-1371. United States of America v. Joseph Grande. In No. 89-1372. United States of America v. Francis Iannarella, Jr., in No. 89-1393. United States of America v. Phillip Narducci. In No. 89-1395. United States of America v. Salvatore Scafidi. In No. 89-1396. United States of America v. Nicholas Virgilio. In No. 89-1397. United States of America v. Charles Iannece. In No. 89-1400. United States of America v. Salvatore Wayne Grande. In No. 89-1401. United States of America v. Joseph Pungitore. In No. 89-1402. United States of America v. Frank Narducci, Jr., in No. 89-1403. United States of America v. Ralph Staino, Jr., in No. 89-1404. United States of America v. Salvatore J. Merlino. In No. 89-1409. United States of America v. Nicodemo Scarfo. In No. 89-1446. United States of America v. Joseph Ciancaglini. In No. 89-1448
See United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188, 194 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989) ("When a party jumps aboard the 'conspiracy train' he assumes responsibility for all conduct whether or not he is conscious of its extent" and therefore a co-conspirator's statements in furtherance of the conspiracy made before the defendant entered the conspiracy are admissible against him); United States v. Baines, 812 F.2d 41, 42 (1st Cir.1987) (same); United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213, 221 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pungitore
See United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188, 194 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989) (“When a party jumps aboard the ‘conspiracy train’ he assumes responsibility for all conduct whether or not he is conscious of its extent” and therefore a co-conspirator’s statements in furtherance of the conspiracy made before the defendant entered the conspiracy are admissible against him); United States v. Baines, 812 F.2d 41, 42 (1st Cir.1987) (same); United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213, 221 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward W. Seeley
See United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188 (1st Cir.1989), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Trenkler
(2×)
Id.; see also United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188, 196 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 955 , 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Tejeda, United States of America v. Paul Christian
See, e.g., United States v. Shenker, 933 F.2d 61, 63 (1st Cir.1991) (district court should exclude evidence if relevant only to show bad character or propensity); see also United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188, 196 (1st Cir.) (evidentiary uses listed in Rule 404(b) not exhaustive), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 955 , 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989). 3 In sum, Tomaski’s testimony that Tejeda possessed the same beeper through which a third party later attempted to facilitate a cocaine transaction tended to make it more likely that Tejeda’s presence during the cocaine transaction at Sun Foods…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Irving Eyster, A/K/A Bobby, Jack Leroy Marshall
Id.; see also United States v. Roper, 874 F.2d 782, 787-88 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 867 , 110 S.Ct. 189 , 107 L.Ed.2d 144 and cert. denied, 493 U.S. 955 , 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oneil F. Stephenson, United States of America v. Ian J. Gohagen, United States of America v. Christopher G. Constantine, United States of America v. Raymond A. Ebanks, United States of America v. Michael J. Swaby, A/K/A Tuffy Ricky
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 68 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); see also United States v. Westbrook, supra. "Evidence of a conspirator's post conspiracy activity is admissible if probative of the existence of a conspiracy or the participation of an alleged conspirator, 'even though they might have occurred after the conspiracy ended.' " United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188, 197 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989), quoting Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211 , 94 S.Ct. 2253 , 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stephenson
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 68 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); see also United States v. Westbrook, supra. “Evidence of a conspirator’s post conspiracy activity is admissible if probative of the existence of a conspiracy or the participation of an alleged conspirator, ‘even though they might have occurred after the conspiracy ended.’ ” United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188, 197 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989), quoting Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211 , 94 S.Ct. 22…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Michigan
v.
Michigan
No. 89-5191.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1989.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1)
Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.