green
Positive treatment
11.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 48 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Walton v. State
(2×)
See Walton v. Florida [ ( Walton III ) ], 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990).
examined
Cited "see"
Jason Dirk Walton v. State of Florida & SC17-1083 Jason Dirk Walton v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
(5×)
See Walton v. Florida [(Walton III)], 493 U.S. 1036 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walton v. State
(2×)
See Walton v. Florida, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Christa Gail Pike v. State of Tennessee
See State v. Alley, 776 S.W.2d 506, 518 (Tenn. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Alley v. Key
See id., cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , *794 110 S.Ct. 758 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. 4,432 Mastercases of Cigarettes
See Oviatt v. Pearce, 954 F.2d 1470 , 1482 (9th Cir.1992) (citing Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, 879 F.2d 481, 487-88 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1035 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 773 (1990)).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Andrew Thomas and Anthony Bond
See State v. Alley, 776 S.W.2d 506, 518 (Tenn. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S. Ct. 1758 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Egan
(2×)
See Krozser v. New Haven, 212 Conn. 415, 423 , 562 A.2d 1080 (1989) (plaintiff seeking money damages against state, alleging that defendant’s actions violated his constitutional rights, required to seek waiver of immunity from claims commissioner before bringing action in court), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S. Ct. 757 , 107 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Walton v. State
See Walton v. Florida, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Douglas v. Hendricks
See Burkett v. Fulcomer, 951 F.2d 1431, 1437 (3d Cir.1991) (citing Lesko v. Owens, 881 F.2d 44 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beck v. Angelone
Ann. *952 § 18.2 — 31(e); see Spencer v. Commonwealth, 238 Va. 275, 283 , 384 S.E.2d 775, 779 (1989) (citations omitted)(defining rape as “sexual intercourse with a female by force and against her will”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips v. Industrial MacHine
(2×)
See Spencer v. Com., 238 Va. 275 , 384 S.E.2d 775 (1989), cert. denied 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S. Ct. 759 , 107 L.
cited
Cited "see"
William A. Butts v. Commonwealth of Virginia
See Spencer v. Commonwealth, 238 Va. 275, 283-84 , 384 S.E.2d 775, 779 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Buehl v. Vaughn
See generally Lesko v. Owens, 881 F.2d 44, 55 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Buehl v. Vaughn
See generally Lesko v. Owens, 881 F.2d 44, 55 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Acuna v. Regents of University of California
See Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, 879 F.2d 481, 484 (9th Cir.1988) (citing Hensley, 461 U.S. at 433 ), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1035 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 773 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rickman v. Dutton
See Lesko v. Owens, 881 F.2d 44, 51 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990); Collins v. Francis, 728 F.2d 1322, 1336 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 963 , 105 S.Ct. 361 , 83 L.Ed.2d 297 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greene v. East Hartford Housing Auth., No. Cv94 053 51 52 (Aug. 9, 1994)
(2×)
See Krozser v. New Haven , 212 Conn. 415 , 562 A.2d 1080 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 774 (1990) (sovereign immunity appropriately raised on a motion to dismiss). "`Subject matter jurisdiction is the power of the court to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.'" Leconche v. Elligers , 215 Conn. 701 , 709 , 579 A.2d 1 (1990), quoting Shea v. First Federal Savings Loan Association of New Haven , 184 Conn. 285 , 288 , 439 A.2d 997 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Singh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
(2×)
See Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, 879 F.2d 481, 484 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1035 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 773 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stefan Martirosian
See generally Northwestern Indiana Telephone Co. v. F.C.C., 872 F.2d 465 , 470 (D.C.Cir.1989) (absent compelling explanation, it is generally inappropriate to consider argument raised on an appeal following remand, where it could have been properly presented on initial appeal), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 1035 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 773 (1990); Walnut Properties, Inc. v. City of Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102, 1106 (9th Cir.1988) (same), cert, denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Barlow-Gresham Union High School District No. 2 v. Wesley Mitchell, Individually, and Bari Mitchell and Michael Mitchell, His Parents
See Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, 879 F.2d 481, 490 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 773 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Earle A. Partington v. Joseph M. Gedan Howard T. Chang
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 3 2 For example, in Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, 879 F.2d 481, 490 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 773 (1990), we held that a district court may not impose Rule 11 sanctions for conduct that occurred "after the signing of the pleadings." In appellate practice, of course, there are no pleadings 3 See, e.g., In Re Becraft, 885 F.2d 547 (9th Cir.1989) (imposing sanctions on an attorney under Fed.R.App.P. 38 for filing a frivolous petition for rehearing); Matter of Hanson, 572 F.2d 192 (9th Cir.1977) (imposing civil sanctions on att…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wrenn v. Kurtz
See Northwestern Indiana Telephone Co. v. FCC, 872 F.2d 465 , 470 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 757 (1990); Walnut Properties v. City of Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102 , 1106 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 109 S.Ct. 1641 (1989). 9 The district court correctly applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel because the criteria that must be satisfied before that doctrine may be applied to bar further litigation on a particular factual issue are satisfied in the present appeal.
cited
Cited "see"
Mayock v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, 869 F.2d 427, 434 (9th Cir.1988), rereported, 879 F.2d 481 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 773 (1990). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Dale Conner v. City Of Santa Ana
See Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, 879 F.2d 481, 483 (9th Cir.1989) (fee awards are reviewed for an abuse of discretion), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 773 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Turner v. Boyle
(2×)
Connecticut law provides, “In the absence of a statutory waiver of sovereign immunity, [a] plaintiff may not bring an action against the [SJtate for monetary damages without authorization from the claims commissioner to do so.” Columbia Air Servs., Inc. v. Dep’t of Transp., 293 Conn. 342, 351 , 977 A.2d 636 (2009) (citing Conn. Gen.Stat. § 4-160); see also Krozser v. City of New Haven, 212 Conn. 415, 423, 562 A.2d 1080 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 774 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franzwa v. City of Hackensack
(2×)
Amant v. Thompson, supra at 731, 88 S.Ct. 1323 ; see also, Price v. Viking Penguin, Inc., 881 F.2d 1426, 1433 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 774 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Todd M. Stevens Vs. Iowa Newspapers, Inc., Susan Harman And Erik Brooks
See, e.g., Price v. Viking Penguin, Inc., 881 F.2d 1426, 1432 (8th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , reh’g denied, 494 U.S. 1013 (1990) (suit for implied defamation 7 by FBI agent; court refused to recognize such suits); Diesen v. Hessburg, 455 N.W.2d 446, 452 (Minn. 1990) (“[W]e hold an allegedly false implication arising out of true statements is generally not actionable in defamation by a public official . . . .”); De Falco v. Anderson, 506 A.2d 1280, 1284 (N.J. 1986) (There can be no libel by innuendo by public figures when the facts in the challenged communication are true.)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stevens v. Iowa Newspapers, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Price v. Viking Penguin, Inc., 881 F.2d 1426, 1432 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 774 , reh’g denied, 494 U.S. 1013 , 110 S.Ct. 1312 , 108 L.Ed.2d 488 (1990) (suit for implied defamation by FBI agent; court refused to recognize such suits); Diesen v. Hessburg, 455 N.W.2d 446, 452 (Minn.1990) (“[W]e hold an allegedly false implication arising out of true statements is generally not actionable in defamation by a public official .... ”); De Falco v. Anderson, 209 N.J.Super. 99 , 506 A.2d 1280, 1284 (1986) (There can be no libel by innuen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
PW Eagle, Inc. v. Schnase
(2×)
See also Price v. Viking Penguin, Inc., 881 F.2d 1426, 1429 (8th Cir.1989) (affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, but only after “extensive ... discovery surrounding the historical facts”), *949 cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 774 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tuchman v. State
(2×)
See also Krozser v. New Haven, 212 Conn. 415, 423 , 562 A.2d 1080 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S. Ct. 757 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paula A. Konikoff v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
(2×)
See, e.g., Price v. Viking Penguin, Inc., 881 F.2d 1426, 1433 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 774 (1990); Carson v. Allied Neius Co., 529 F.2d 206, 209 (7th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Department of Public Works v. Ecap Construction Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Kroszer v. New Haven, 212 Conn. 415, 423 , 562 A.2d 1080 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S. Ct. 757 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freyd v. Whitfield
(2×)
See, e.g., Price v. Viking Penguin, Inc., 881 F.2d 1426, 1444 (8th Cir.1989) (“We do not know how authors can ever write about controversies without reporting accusations and counter-accusations”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 774 (1990); Hickey v. Capital Cities/ABC, 792 F.Supp. 1195 (D.Or.1992), aff ’d, 999 F.2d 543 (9th Cir.1993); Janklow v. Newsweek, Inc., 759 F.2d 644, 649 (8th Cir.1985), rev’d on other grounds, 788 F.2d 1300 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 883 , 107 S.Ct. 272, 93 L.Ed.2d 249 (1986); Medina v. Time, Inc., 439 F.2d 1129, 11…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Mak, No. Cv96-329180 (Mar. 7, 1997)
(2×)
See also Krozser v. New Haven, 212 Conn. 415 , 422 , 562 A.2d 1080 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 774 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pelullo
See United States v. Biberfeld, 957 F.2d 98, 103 (3d Cir. 1992) (recognizing that Brady violations fall within the scope of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ); see also Lesko v. Owens, 881 F.2d 44 , 50 (3d Cir. 1990) ("Whether an error reaches the magnitude of a constitutional violation is an issue of law, subject to plenary review."), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard A. Pelullo
See United States v. Biberfeld, 957 F.2d 98, 103 (3d Cir.1992) (recognizing that Brady violations fall within the scope of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ); see also Lesko v. Owens, 881 F.2d 44, 50 (3d Cir.1989) (‘Whether an error reaches the magnitude of a constitutional violation is an issue of law, subject to plenary review.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tizard
See, e.g., State v. Alley, 776 S.W.2d 506, 512 (Tenn.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 758 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990) (improper to show effect of crime upon victim’s family); State v. Hensley, 656 S.W.2d 410, 414 (Tenn.Crim.App.1983) (should not use evidence designed to raise sympathy for victim and his family).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hutchison
(2×)
See also State v. Alley, 776 S.W.2d 506 (Tenn. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 758 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Antinerella v. Rioux
(2×)
Doe v. Heintz, supra, 204 Conn. 31 -32; see also Krozser v. New Haven, 212 Conn. 415 , 562 A.2d 1080 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S. Ct. 757 , 107 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughes v. Com.
See, e.g., Spencer v. Commonwealth, 238 Va. 275 , 384 S.E.2d 775 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughes v. Commonwealth
See, e.g., Spencer v. Commonwealth, 238 Va. 275 , 384 S.E.2d 775 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brenda J. Hamer v. Career College Association
Corp. v. Burroughs Corp., 801 F.2d 1531, 1536 (9th Cir.1986); see also Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, 879 F.2d 481, 490 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1035 , 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 773 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Francis Ordean Reese v. Thomas A. Fulcomer
In this case, we have plenary review of the *254 district court’s decision, “as the dismissal of the habeas petition was based on the state court record, and not on independent factfinding of the district court.” Lesko, 925 F.2d at 1536 ; see also Lesko v. Owens, 881 F.2d 44, 50 (3d Cir.1989) (deriving plenary standard from “the function of a reviewing court in a habeas corpus proceeding”), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 , 110 S.Ct. 759 , 107 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Locricchio v. Evening News Ass'n
(2×)
See, e.g., Price v Viking Penguin, Inc, 881 F2d 1426, 1432 (CA 8, 1989), cert den 493 US 1036 (1990) (refusing to recognize defamation by implication).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jill Ruzicka v. The Conde Nast Publications, Inc. And Claudia Dreifus
Stubbs v. North Memorial Medical Center, 448 N.W.2d 78, 80-81 (Minn.Ct.App.1989), pet. for rev. denied, Jan. 12, 1990; Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319 , 226 N.W.2d 921, 923 (1975); see also Price v. Viking Press, Inc., 625 F.Supp. 641, 651 (D.Minn.1985) (refusing to recognize invasion of privacy claim under Minnesota law in the first instance), aff’d, 881 F.2d 1426 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 774 (1990). (5) Finally Ruzicka presses a claim for unjust *584 enrichment on the theory that through publication of the Glamour article in violation of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall v. Commonwealth
See, e.g., Spencer v. Commonwealth, 238 Va. 275, 290 , 384 S.E.2d 775, 783 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1036 (1990) (DNA testing admissible because evidence establishes that it is a reliable scientific technique); O’Dell v. Commonwealth, 234 Va. at 695-97 , 364 S.E.2d at 504-05 (electrophoresis blood testing admissible because reliable and generally accepted in the field of forensic science); Lee v. Commonwealth, 200 Va. 233, 237 , 105 S.E.2d 152, 155 (1958) (lie detector test results inadmissible because such tests generally have not been proved scientifically reliable).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
See, e.g., Northwestern Indiana Telephone v. FCC, 872 F.2d 465 , 471 (D.C.Cir.1989) (no second opportunity afforded to comply with administrative exhaustion requirements because "[t]he efficiency and fairness values served by exhaustion principles would be seriously compromised if agencies were obliged to furnish such second bites at the apple.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 757 , 107 L.Ed.2d 773 (1990); Phillips v. Lane, 787 F.2d 208, 215 (7th Cir.) (as to a waiver of argument in habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner "is not entitled to endless bites at the same apple or to a windfall …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Krozser, Administrator of the Estate of Krozser
v.
Connecticut
v.
Connecticut
No. 89-704.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 1990.
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Conn. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.