green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Claude Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Asbestos Corporation Limited
See King v. Armstrong World Industries, 906 F.2d 1022, 1026 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 942 , 111 S.Ct. 2236 , 114 L.Ed.2d 478 (1991). 82 Further complaint is made by Pittsburgh Corning as to the district court's instructions concerning exemplary damages and what was necessary to find in order to impose them.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keene Corp. v. Kirk
See, e.g., King v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 906 F.2d 1022, 1033 (5th Cir.1990), cert, denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2236 , 114 L.Ed.2d 478 (1991) (citing Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 378 F.2d 832, 839 (2d Cir.1967)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunn v. HOVIC
Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 87 Md.App. 699 , 591 A.2d 544, 557 (1991), aff'd in part & rev’d in part, 326 Md. 107 , 604 A.2d 47 cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 204 , 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992); see also King v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 906 F.2d 1022, 1030 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2236 , 114 L.Ed.2d 478 (1991); Simpson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 901 F.2d 277, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 497 U.S. 1057 , 111 S.Ct. 27 , 111 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990); Man v. Raymark Indus., 728 F.Supp. 1461, 1466 (D.Haw.1989); Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc. v. Balbos, 326 Md. 179 , 604 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Dunn Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. v. Hovic Amerada Hess Corp. Keene Corporation v. The Litwin Corporation Litwin Panamerican Corp. Borinquen Insulation Co. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation
Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 87 Md.App. 699 , 591 A.2d 544, 557 (1991), aff'd in part & rev'd in part, 326 Md. 107 , 604 A.2d 47 cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 204 , 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992); see also King v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 906 F.2d 1022, 1030 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2236 , 114 L.Ed.2d 478 (1991); Simpson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 901 F.2d 277, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 497 U.S. 1057 , 111 S.Ct. 27 , 111 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990); Man v. Raymark Indus., 728 F.Supp. 1461, 1466 (D.Haw.1989); Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc. v. Balbos, 326 Md. 179 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
37 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 783, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,542 William Dunn Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. v. Hovic Amerada Hess Corp. Keene Corporation v. The Litwin Corporation Litwin Panamerican Borinquen Insulation Co. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation
Compare Lohrmann, 782 F.2d at 1159-60 (holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding documents gathered by Sumner Simpson, a former president of Raybestos Manhattan (now Raymark)), with King v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 906 F.2d 1022, 1025 (5th Cir.1990) (no abuse of discretion in admitting Sumner Simpson papers as they are "relevant to the issue of what knowledge was scientifically discoverable by the industry as a whole at a certain time"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2236 , 114 L.Ed.2d 478 (1991). 45 In light of the relevance of the Hemeon Report to wh…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunn v. HOVIC
Compare Lohrmann, 782 F.2d at 1159-60 (holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding documents gathered by Sumner Simpson, a former president of Raybestos Manhattan (now Raymark)), with King v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 906 F.2d 1022, 1025 (5th Cir.1990) (no abuse of discretion in admitting Sumner Simpson papers as they are “relevant to the issue of what knowledge was scientifically discoverable by the industry as a whole at a certain time”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2236 , 114 L.Ed.2d 478 (1991).- In light of the relevance of the Hemeon Report to what …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Celotex Corp.
v.
King
v.
King
No. 90-1490.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 1991.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.