green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Estate of Phillips v. City of Milwaukee
a plaintiff that faults a municipality's inaction must show that there is an 'extremely high degree' of municipal culpability.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bud McLaughlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
we look at jury instructions in the broad context of the entire trial including the court record, the court's rulings, the allegations set forth in the pleadings, the evidence presented at trial, as well as the opening and closing arguments of counsel.
cited
Cited "see"
Turner v. Sheriff of Marion County
See Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524, 532-33 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 207 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Jo Ann Stopka v. Alliance of American Insurers, Rodger S. Lawson, C. Clarke Imbler
See Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524, 531 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 207 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Chicago Club
See Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524, 545 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 207 (1990); Pearl v. Keystone Consol.
cited
Cited "see"
Weaver v. Brenner
See McCowan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 908 F.2d 1099, 1104 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 250 , 112 L.Ed.2d 209 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weaver v. Brenner
See McCowan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 908 F.2d 1099, 1104 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 250 , 112 L.Ed.2d 209 (1990). 47 Plaintiff does not contend that the dismissal of his false arrest and malicious prosecution causes of action is likely to infect the proceedings on his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment claims with error.
cited
Cited "see"
Israel Weinstock Jb Trading International, Ltd. And 4200 Avenue K Realty Corp. v. Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton
See McGowan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 908 F.2d 1099, 1103 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 250 , 112 L.Ed.2d 209 (1990); Averhart v. Arrendondo, 773 F.2d 919, 920 (7th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Henry A. Leonard & Co. v. United States Trustee (In Re River Foal, Inc.)
See McCowan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 908 F.2d 1099 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 250 , 112 L.Ed.2d 209 (1990); San Filippo v. United States Trust Co., 737 F.2d 246 , 255 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied 470 U.S. 1035 , 105 S.Ct. 1408 , 84 L.Ed.2d 797 (1985); United States v. Ianniello, 824 F.2d 203, 209 (2d Cir.1987); C.
cited
Cited "see"
Porter v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicago
See Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524, 538-39 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 207 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Kersey v. Dennison
See ___ McCowan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 908 F.2d 1099, 1103 (2d Cir.), _______ _____________________ cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 (1990). _____ ______ 6 reconsideration.
cited
Cited "see"
Kersey v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.
See McCowan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 908 F.2d 1099, 1103 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 250 , 112 L.Ed.2d 209 (1990). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Peck
See Davis v. City and County of San Francisco, 890 F.2d 1438, 1450 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 248 , 112 L.Ed.2d 206 (1990) (injunction did not violate Rule 65(d) where it referred to but did not attach copy of rules of which enjoined parties were aware); United States v. McAndrew, 480 F.Supp. 1189, 1192-1194 (E.D.Va.1979) (order referring to consent agreement did not violate Rule 65(d) where agreement and order were drafted by parties and defendants were familiar with terms of order and agreement; violation of order could result in finding of criminal contempt).
cited
Cited "see"
Nueces County Appraisal District v. Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co.
See Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. v. Pilot Petroleum, 900 F.2d 816, 820 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 248 , 112 L.Ed.2d 207 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re MURDOCK MACHINE AND ENGINEERING COMPANY OF UTAH, Bankrupt. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Logan A. BAGLEY, Trustee, Appellee
See McCowan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 908 F.2d 1099, 1104-05 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 250 , 112 L.Ed.2d 209 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Cotton v. Reynolds
See Strong v. Board of Educ., 902 F.2d 208 , 211 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 250 , 112 L.Ed.2d 208 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Wood v. Annette Chambers Smith, et al.
See Fisher v. McGinnis, 121 F.3d 708 (6th Cir. 1997) (recognizing the legitimate penological interest in maintaining security and order); see also Pollock v. Marshall, 845 F.2d 656, 658-60 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Silivanch v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
See also Weinstock, 16 F.3d at 503 (referring to McCowan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 908 F.2d 1099, 1103 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 250 , 112 L.Ed.2d 209 (1990), in which we observed that "Judge Posner has appropriately termed Rule 4(a) [as then in effect] a ‘trap for the unwary into which many appellants, especially those not represented by counsel ... have fallen, with dire consequences since there is no way they can reinstate their appeal if the second notice of appeal is untimely.' Averhart v. Arrendondo, 773 F.2d 919, 920 (7th Cir.1985).”). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armstrong v. Mille Lacs County Sheriffs Dept.
Landis v. American Water Works & Electric Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 , 57 S.Ct. 163 , 81 L.Ed. 153 (1936); see also, Lunde v. Helms, 898 F.2d 1343, 1345 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 208 (1990); Webb v. R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Linda B. Jones v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
(2×)
See, e.g., McCowan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 908 F.2d 1099, 1103-04 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 (1990); Lyell Theatre Corp. v. Loews Corp., 682 F.2d 37, 40-41 (2d Cir. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kemp v. Tyson Seafood Group, Inc.
Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 , 57 S.Ct. 163 , 81 *965 L.Ed. 153 (1936); see also, Lunde v. Helms, 898 F.2d 1343, 1345 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 208 (1990); Webb v. R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terra Industries, Inc. v. Commonwealth Insurance Co. of America
See, e.g., Lunde v. Helms, 898 F.2d 1343, 1345 (8th Cir.) (a stay of federal litigation pending exhaustion of state administrative and judicial proceedings was a “matter of docket management” within the court’s inherent power), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 208 (1990); Webb v. R.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.
See, e.g., Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524, 535-36 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 207 (1990). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Lines, Inc. v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (In Re United States Lines, Inc.)
See, e.g., McCowan v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 908 F.2d 1099 , 1104—05 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 250 , 112 L.Ed.2d 209 (1990); Barrett v. United States, 798 F.2d 565, 570-71 (2d Cir.1986); United States v. Tom, 787 F.2d 65 , 68 n. 3 (2d Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe ex rel. G.S. v. Johnson
See, e.g., Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524, 535 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 207 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Johnson
See, e.g., Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524, 535 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 207 (1990). 37 We also note that the district court did not commit error in its instructions to the jury on the issue of proximate cause.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Geldermann, Inc. v. Financial Management Consultants, Inc.
Id. at 674 ; see also Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524, 535-36 (7th Cir.) (party who failed to challenge jury instruction on nominal damages could not avoid waiver by characterizing nominal damages as a legal question), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 207 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lunde v. Helms
Lunde v. Iowa Board of Regents, 487 N.W.2d 857 (Iowa Ct.App.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 377 , 121 L.Ed.2d 288 (1992); see also Lunde v. Helms, 898 F.2d 1343 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (appeal of stay of district court proceedings), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 208 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lunde v. Helms
Lunde v. Iowa Board of Regents, 487 N.W.2d 357 (Iowa Ct.App.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 377 , 121 L.Ed.2d 288 (1992); see also Lunde v. Helms, 898 F.2d 1343 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (appeal of stay of district court proceedings), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 208 (1990). 3 In 1987 Lunde received unsatisfactory reviews in three clinical rotations during her third year of medical school at the University of Iowa.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Czajkowski v. City of Chicago, Ill.
See also Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524 , 542 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 897 , 111 S.Ct. 249 , 112 L.Ed.2d 207 (1990) (quoting Jones v. City of Chicago, 787 F.2d 200, 204 (7th Cir. 1986)) (customs are persistent and widespread practices of officials; the “word ‘custom’ generally implies a habitual practice or a course of action that characteristically is repeated under like circumstances”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798, International Association of Fire Fighters, AFL-CIO
v.
City and County of San Francisco
v.
City and County of San Francisco
No. 90-248.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1990.
498 U.S. 897
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1) · E.D. Wisconsin (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.