Needler v. Valley Nat'l Bank of Arizona, 111 S. Ct. 2823 (1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Needler v. Valley Nat'l Bank of Arizona, 111 S. Ct. 2823 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fuller v. M.G. Jewelry (ca9, 1991-12-11) · Strongest negative: Davis v. Internal Revenue Service (vaed, 1992-01-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Davis v. Internal Revenue Service
E.D. Va. · 1992 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see IRS v. Nordic Village, Inc. (In re Nordic Village, Inc.), 915 F.2d 1049, 1051 (6th Cir.1990) (ruling that Hoffman is not controlling precedent when case concerns waiver of sovereign immunity under 11 U.S.C. § 106 for federal, as opposed to state, governmental unit), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" Fuller v. M.G. Jewelry
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Image Technical Service, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that plaintiff's failure to raise an issue in opposition to a defendant’s motion for summary judgment waived the issue), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991); United States v. Munoz, 746 F.2d 1389, 1390 (9th Cir.1984) (refusing to consider a tort theory not raised below in a contract action).
discussed Cited "see" Fuller v. Jewelry
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Image Technical Service, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that plaintiff's failure to raise an issue in opposition to a defendant's motion for summary judgment waived the issue), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991); United States v. Munoz, 746 F.2d 1389, 1390 (9th Cir.1984) (refusing to consider a tort theory not raised below in a contract action).
discussed Cited "see" Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Image Technical Service, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that plaintiffs failure to raise an issue in opposition to a defendant’s motion for summary judgment waived the issue), ce rt. granted, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991); Munoz, 746 F.2d at 1390 (refusing to consider a tort theory not raised in contract action below).
discussed Cited "see" Alaska Airlines, Inc. Midway Airlines Muse Air Corporation v. United Airlines, Inc., Alaska Airlines, Inc, and Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., and American Airlines, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Image Technical Service, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that plaintiff's failure to raise an issue in opposition to a defendant's motion for summary judgment waived the issue), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991); Munoz, 746 F.2d at 1390 (refusing to consider a tort theory not raised in contract action below).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Town Sound And Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (rule of reason theory not considered because plaintiff did not raise it until appeal), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Town Sound & Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (rule of reason theory not considered because plaintiff did not raise it until appeal), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." City of Anaheim, City of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Colton, City of Azusa v. Southern California Edison Company
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Image Technical Serv., Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 903 F.2d 612 (9th Cir.1990), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William L. NEEDLER
v.
VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA
No. 90-7740.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1991.
111 S. Ct. 2823
Marshall, Stevens.
Published

Lead Opinion

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 8, 1991, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Dissent

Justice MARSHALL and Justice STEVENS,

dissenting:

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U.S. 928, 104 S.Ct. 331, 78 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983), we would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.