green
Positive treatment
8.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Derek Foster
But see United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 501 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990); United States v. Carter, 901 F.2d 683, 684-85 (8th Cir.1990); United States v. Hernandez-Cuartas, 717 F.2d 552, 555 (11th Cir.1983). 7 .The text of Rule 702 states: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise. 8…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Antoine Richmond, A/K/A Shawn A. Forbes, Antoine Forbes
See United States v. Long, 905 F.2d 1572, 1574 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 948 , 111 S.Ct. 365 , 112 L.Ed.2d 328 (1990); United States v. Lucas, 597 F.2d 243, 245 (10th Cir.1979) (per curiam); United States v. Stolarz, 547 F.2d 108, 111 (9th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
See United States v. Long, 905 F.2d 1572, 1580 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 948 , 111 S.Ct. 365 , 112 L.Ed.2d 328 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Karola Jamison
See United States v. Rivera, 43 F.3d 1291, 1295 (9th Cir.1995) (quoting United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 500 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990)) ("a party fails to preserve an evidentiary issue for appeal not only by failing to make a specific objection, ... but also by making the wrong specific objection") 5 The government claims, see Appellee's Br. at 21, and Jamison does not dispute, that there was a hearing outside the presence of the jury at which she could have made these objections 6 Jamison claims that the district judge interrup…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sylvestro Nanfro, Antonino Fazio, Also Known as Nino, & James W. McGrath Robert Ingrao, Also Known as Bobby
Id. at 1435-36 (citation omitted); accord United States v. Torres, 908 F.2d 1417, 1421-22 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 948 , 111 S.Ct. 366 , 112 L.Ed.2d 329 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Andrew Headley v. Lawrence Tilghman, Warden, Connecticut Correction Institution--Somers
See United States v. Long, 905 F.2d 1572, 1579-80 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 948 , 111 S.Ct. 365 , 112 L.Ed.2d 328 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago Pena-Espinoza
(2×)
See United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 500 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Rivera
See Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1). 2 Furthermore, in United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 500 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 368 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990), this court stated the rule that “a party fails to preserve an evidentiary issue for appeal not only by failing to make a specific objection, ... but also by making the wrong specific objection.” (citations omitted) (emphasis in original).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Boonphakdee
See United States v. Campuzano, 905 F.2d 677, 679 (2d Cir.) ("Section 841(a) of Title 21 prohibits the distribution of any amount of cocaine and in no way requires proof of a particular quantity of narcotics as an element of the conspiracy to distribute."), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Boonphakdee
See United States v. Campuzano, 905 F.2d 677, 679 (2d Cir.) (“Section 841(a) of Title 21 prohibits the distribution of any amount of cocaine and in no way requires proof of a particular quantity of narcotics as an element of the conspiracy to distribute.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael A. Smith, and Kwabene D. German, A/K/A Kwabene Gibson
See United States v. Campuzano, 905 F.2d 677 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Ann Deisch
See United States v. Campuzano, 905 F.2d 677, 678 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990) (cocaine; citing cases).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Monocchi
See United States v. Pico, 2 F.3d 472, 475 (2d Cir.1993) (citing United States v. Campuzano, 905 F.2d 677, 679 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Craig Lee Childs
See United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 500 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Pico
See United States v. Campuzano, 905 F.2d 677, 679 (2d Cir.) (holding that under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 & 846 “quantity is relevant only to enhancement of the sentence”), cer t. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Barnes
See United States v. Long, 905 F.2d 1572, 1581 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 948 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruben Taren-Palma, United States of America v. Ismael Calderon-Perez
(2×)
See United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 501 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joe Morgan v. Bill Woessner, and Clay Searle Los Angeles City, (Two Cases)
(2×)
See United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 500 (9th Cir.) ("[A] party fails to preserve an evidentiary issue for appeal not only by failing to make a specific objection, [citations omitted], but also by making the wrong specific objection [citations omitted]”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramos
See Fed.R.App.P. 4(b). 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Although this Circuit has followed Robinson in not allowing district courts to extend the time for filing appeals except as provided by Rule 4(b), see, e.g., United States v. Long, 905 F.2d 1572, 1574-75 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 948 , 111 S.Ct. 365 , 112 L.Ed.2d 328 (1990), this Circuit, as well as the Supreme Court and a majority of the other circuits, have allowed a defendant to circumvent, in effect, the Robinson decision by vacating and resen-tencing a defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to allow the time for appeal to begin again.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard B. Hudson, Sr.
(2×)
See United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 500 (9th Cir.) (specific objection made on the wrong grounds and overruled precludes a party from raising a specific objection on other, tenable, grounds on appeal), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joe Morgan v. Bill Woessner, and Clay Searle Los Angeles City, (Two Cases)
See United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 500 (9th Cir.) ("[A] party fails to preserve an evidentiary issue for appeal not only by failing to make a specific objection, [citations omitted], but also by making the wrong specific objection [citations omitted]”), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ted A. Musacchio
See United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 500 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Williams, Jr.
See United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 501 (9th Cir.) (finding no plain error when the district judge twice cautioned the jury to consider the profile testimony only as background material), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ted A. Musacchio
See United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 500 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Naranjo
See United States v. Campuzano, 905 F.2d 677, 679 (2nd Cir.1990) (citations to other Circuits provided), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Small
See, e.g., United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 501 (9th Cir.) (“Courts are keenly aware of the dangers of admitting testimony concerning the drug courier profile.”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Antonio DUQUE, Defendant-Appellant
See, e.g., United States v. Torres, 908 F.2d 1417, 1422 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 948 , 111 S.Ct. 366 , 112 L.Ed.2d 329 (1990); United States v. Carneiro, 861 F.2d 1171, 1177 (9th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 527, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8949 United States of America v. John Jario Gil, United States of America v. Daniel Montoya
See also United States v. Torres, 908 F.2d 1417, 1425 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 948 , 111 S.Ct. 366 , 112 L.Ed.2d 329 (1990). 1.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Torres Maldonado
See also United States v. Long, 905 F.2d 1572 , 1576 & n. 6 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 948 , 111 S.Ct. 365 , 112 L.Ed.2d 328 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thyrus Montez Brown
See Foster, 939 F.2d at 451. & n. 6 (collecting cases); McDonald, 933 F.2d at 1522 ; see also United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 500-01 (9th Cir.) (expert testimony concerning drug courier proffle admitted for limited purpose of providing background information), cert. denied, 498 U.s. 947, 111 5.Ct. 363, 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Kruse
Fed.R.Evid. 103; see, e.g., United States v. Gomez-Norena, 908 F.2d 497, 499-500 (9th Cir.) (holding that a party fails to preserve an evidentiary issue for appeal not only by failing to make a specific objection but also by making the wrong specific objection), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 363 , 112 L.Ed.2d 326 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Taylor
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-5690.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1990.
Cited by 83 opinions | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.