green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bradshaw
Accord Hutch-ings, 950 P.2d at 480 (" 'A [RICO] violation occurs not when the defendant engages in the predicate acts, but only when he uses or invests the proceeds of that activity in an enterprise." ") (citation omitted). 131 Similarly, in Grider v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp., 868 F.2d 1147 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 820 , 110 S.Ct. 76 , 107 L.Ed.2d 48 (1989), the court stated: "Significantly, the [RICO] statute does not state that it is unlawful to receive racketeering income; rather, as the ... language underscores, the statute prohibits a person who has received such income from using…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. U.S. Postal Service
DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 172 , 103 S.Ct. 2281 , 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983); see United States Postal Service v. American Postal Workers Union, 893 F.2d 1117 (9th Cir.1990) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 820 , 111 S.Ct. 67 , 112 L.Ed.2d 42 . *564 The arbitration decision that Wright seeks to enforce was issued “on or about April 3, 1996.” (ComplJ 8).
cited
Cited "see"
Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto Rico
See, Bordanaro v. McLeod, 871 F.2d 1151, 1160 (1st Cir.1989) cert. denied 498 U.S. 820 , 110 S.Ct. 75 , 107 L.Ed.2d 42 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Emmens v. Johnson
Accord Fox Valley & Vicinity Const. Workers Pension Fund v. Brown, 897 F.2d 275, 282-285 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (dissenting opinions), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 820 , 111 S.Ct. 67 , 112 L.Ed.2d 41 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Dorsey
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir.) (a refusal to depart is reviewable when it is based on the erroneous conclusion of the district court that it lacked authority to depart), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 66 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
(2×)
See Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Pension Fund v. Brown, 897 F.2d 275, 281 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 820 , 111 S.Ct. 67 , 112 L.Ed.2d 41 (1990). a.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Altobelli v. International Business MacHines Corp.
(2×)
Heeding "the federal rule favoring beneficiary designations filed with a plan administrator" promotes the "strong interest in uniform, uncomplicated administration of ERISA plans." Krishna v. Colgate Palmolive Co., 7 F.3d 11, 16 (2d Cir. 1993); see also Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Pension Fund v. Brown, 897 F.2d 275, 283 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (Easterbrook, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 820 (1990). "[R]eliance on the face of written plan documents" also furthers another of ERISA's central goals, that of "enabling beneficiaries[and employees] to learn their rights and obl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Altobelli v. International Business Machines Corp.
Heeding "the federal rule favoring beneficiary designations filed with a plan administrator" promotes the "strong interest in uniform, uncomplicated administration of ERISA plans." Krishna v. Colgate Palmolive Co., 7 F.3d 11, 16 (2d Cir.1993); see also Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Pension Fund v. Brown, 897 F.2d 275, 283 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (Easterbrook, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 820 , 111 S.Ct. 67 , 112 L.Ed.2d 41 (1990). "[R]eliance on the face of written plan documents" also furthers another of ERISA's central goals, that of "enabling beneficiaries[and employees…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Butler v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
See, e.g., Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Pension Fund v. Brown, 897 F.2d 275, 279 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 820 , 111 S.Ct. 67 , 112 L.Ed.2d 41 (1990); Zinn v. Donaldson Co., 799 F.Supp. 69, 72 (D.Minn.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' Union v. United Magazine Co.
Brick Mason Contractors v. Harrington, 820 F.2d 31, 37 (2d Cir.1987), the Court applied the NLRA six month statute of limitations to actions to compel a labor arbitration commended under LMRA section 301 (Id.; see also U.S. Postal Serv. v. American Postal Workers Union, 893 F.2d 1117 , 1122 [9th Cir.] [the six month limitation period was applied to labor arbitration proceeding], cert. denied, 498 U.S. 820 , 111 S.Ct. 67 , 112 L.Ed.2d 42 [1990]; Communications Workers of America v. Western Elec., 860 F.2d 1137, 1140-41 [1st Cir.1988] [same]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Quantum Chemical Corp.
v.
Distillery, Wine & Allied Workers International Union, Local Union No. 32, AFL-CIO
v.
Distillery, Wine & Allied Workers International Union, Local Union No. 32, AFL-CIO
No. 89-1937.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.