green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.4 score
“the denial of a class certification and the disqualification of counsel are interlocutory orders which are not immediately appealablej”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jacobs v. Citibank, N.A.
the denial of a class certification and the disqualification of counsel are interlocutory orders which are not immediately appealablej
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States of America Sandra Emrich, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service v. John Theakston, United States of America Sandra Emrich, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service, Jill Brunberg v. John Theakston, and James Joseph Lynch, Jr.
Second, Lynch seems to agree that under Maisonville v. F2 America, Inc., 902 F.2d 746 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 674 (1991), a magistrate judge may order Rule 11 sanctions if the sanctions are "non-dispositive of a claim or defense of a party" Id. at 747.
discussed
Cited "see"
Washburn v. AT&T Umbrella Plan 1
See Alday v. Container Corp. of Am., 906 F.2d 660, 665 (11th Cir. 1990), cert. denied 111 S.Ct. 674 (1991) (a right to benefits “can only be found if it is established by contract under the terms of the ERISA-governed plan document.”) 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Newman v. RCN Telecom Services, Inc.
See Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 903 F.2d 176, 179-80 (2d Cir.1990) (class certification properly denied because plaintiff was inappropriate class representative because its claim was subject to several unique defenses, including the fact that it continued to purchase the disputed CDs despite having knowledge of the alleged fraud), cert. denied 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991); In re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litig., 230 F.R.D. 303, 308 (S.D.N.Y.2004) (class certification of § 349 claim not appropriate where plainti…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mendoza v. Zirkle Fruit Co.
See Hanon, 976 F.2d at 508 . (“a named plaintiffs motion for class certification should not be granted if ‘there is a danger that absent class members will suffer if their representative is preoccupied with defenses unique to it’ ” (quoting Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 903 F.2d 176, 180 (2d Cir.1990), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 1025, 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scheckel v. Iowa Department of Revenue & Finance
(2×)
See Osceola v. Florida Dep’t of Revenue, 893 F.2d 1231 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 674 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991) (denying jurisdiction on basis of Tax Injunction Act despite the presence of § 1343 claim).
cited
Cited "see"
BNL Equity Corp. v. Pearson
See Gary Plastic Packaging v. Merrill Lynch, 903 F.2d 176 (2nd Cir.1990), cert denied. 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp. v. Oceanbridge Shipping International, Inc.
See Insurance Co. of North America v. M/V *1064 OCEAN LINK, 901 F.2d 934 , 937 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marinaccio v. Barnett Banks, Inc.
See Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 903 F.2d 176, 180 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991) quoting General Tel.
cited
Cited "see"
Kalodner v. Michaels Stores, Inc.
See Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 903 F.2d 176, 180 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnsen v. Collins
(2×)
See Osceola v. Florida Dep't of Revenue, 893 F.2d 1231 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 674 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991) (denying jurisdiction on basis of Tax Injunction Act despite presence of § 1343 claim).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnsen v. Collins
(2×)
See Osceola v. Florida Dep't of Revenue, 893 F.2d 1231 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 674 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991) (denying jurisdiction on basis of Tax Injunction Act despite presence of § 1343 claim).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maywalt v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co.
See Hearing Trans, of July 19, 1994 at 28-30 (making reference to Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 903 F.2d 176, 179 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991)); Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Roller, 472 U.S. 424, 430-32 , 105 S.Ct. 2757, 2760-62 , 86 L.Ed.2d 340 (1985) (O’Connor, J.) (clarifying Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368 , 101 S.Ct. 669 , 66 L.Ed.2d 571 (1981) (holding orders denying motions to disqualify counsel in civil cases not appeal-able as final decisions under § 1291 or unde…
cited
Cited "see"
Orion Insurance v. The M/V \Humacao\""
See Insurance Co. of North America v. M/V Ocean Lynx, 901 F.2d 934, 937 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991); S/S Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Eng
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Maisonville v. F2 America, Inc., 902 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 674 , 112 L.Ed.2d 666 (1991); San Shiah Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. Pride Shipping Corp., 783 F.Supp. 1334, 1335 (S.D.Ala.1992) (magistrate judge has authority to impose Rule 11 sanctions under § 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Werner v. Satterlee, Stephens, Burke & Burke
See Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Merrill Lynch, 119 F.R.D. 344, 347-48 (S.D.N.Y.1988), aff'd, 903 F.2d 176 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe v. State of La.
See Osceola v. Florida Dep't of Revenue, 893 F.2d 1231 (11th Cir. 1990) (Tax Injunction Act bars consideration of individual tribal members' claims where state provides "plain, speedy and efficient remedy"), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 674 (1991); Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes v. Montana, 568 F. Supp. 269, 276-79 (D.
examined
Cited "see"
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe, a Sovereign Indian Nation v. State of Louisiana
(4×)
See Osceola v. Florida Dep’t of Revenue, 893 F.2d 1231 (11th Cir.1990) (Tax Injunction Act bars consideration of individual tribal members’ claims where state provides "plain, speedy and efficient remedy"), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 674 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991); Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes v. Montana, 568 F.Supp. 269, 276-79 (D.Mont.1983) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baldwin Mut. Ins. Co. v. McCain
Holdings, Inc. v. Mowbray , 208 F.3d 288 , 295 (1st Cir. 2000) (observing that "we regard the law as settled *812 that affirmative defenses should be considered in making class certification decisions"); see also note 4, supra. Baldwin Mutual notes that federal courts have concluded that when a class representative's claims are subject to a unique defense, the class should not be certified, either because the situation renders the class representative's claims atypical or because the class representative cannot adequately protect the class's interests in that the class representative will have…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baldwin Mut. Ins. Co. v. McCain
Holdings, Inc. v. Mowbray , 208 F.3d 288 , 295 (1st Cir. 2000) (observing that "we regard the law as settled *812 that affirmative defenses should be considered in making class certification decisions"); see also note 4, supra. Baldwin Mutual notes that federal courts have concluded that when a class representative's claims are subject to a unique defense, the class should not be certified, either because the situation renders the class representative's claims atypical or because the class representative cannot adequately protect the class's interests in that the class representative will have…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dye v. Communications Ventures III, LP (In re Flashcom, Inc.)
See, e.g., Maisonville v. F2 Am., Inc., 902 F.2d 746, 749 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 674 , 112 L.Ed.2d 666 (1991) (affirming sanctions where the motion for reconsideration was “factually frivolous”). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dupler v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
Id.; see also Gary Plastic Packaging Corp., 903 F.2d at 179-80 (holding class certification properly denied because plaintiff was inappropriate class representative given its claim was subject to several unique defenses, including the fact that it continued to purchase disputed CDs despite having knowledge of the alleged fraud) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 ; In re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litig., 230 F.R.D. 303, 308 (S.D.N.Y.2004) (holding class certification of § 349 claim not appropriate where plaintiff was atypical because he continued to use his c…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Towers Financial Corp. Noteholders Litigation
See, e.g., Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 903 F.2d 176, 179 (2d Cir.1990) (“In light of the importance of the class action device in securities fraud suits, [Rule 23’s] factors are to be construed liberally.”), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991); Korn v. Franchard Corp., 456 F.2d 1206, 1209 (2d Cir.1972); Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 296 (2d Cir.1968), cert, denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); In re Frontier Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Henley v. Marine Transportion
See, e.g., Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. M/V Ocean Lynx, 901 F.2d 934 , 939 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991); General Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Temple v. WISAP USA in Texas
See, e.g., Maisonville v. F2 Am., Inc., 902 F.2d 746 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, Dombroski v. F2 Am., Inc., 498 U.S. 1025 , 111 S.Ct. 674 , 112 L.Ed.2d 666 (1991); Bergeson v. Dilworth, 749 F.Supp. 1555, 1561-62 (D.Kan.1990); San Shiah Enterprise Co. v. Pride Shipping Corp., 783 F.Supp. 1334 (S.D.Ala.1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Osceola
v.
Florida Department of Revenue
v.
Florida Department of Revenue
No. 90-653.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.