green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1993 ·
…e may affirm a judgment on any ground supported by the record even if not relied upon by the district court.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1995 ·
…revocation of physician's license is considered to be remedial under the double jeopardy clause
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Zerkel
(2×)
revocation of physician's license is considered to be remedial under the double jeopardy clause
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
63 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 47, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,567 Monroe Maness v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. H.J. Heinz Company, Inc. Motkov, Griffin, Parsons, Salzman & Madoff Keith C. Hult James J. Salzman Ray McCabe Alan D. Dierdorff Larry Burke
e may affirm a judgment on any ground supported by the record even if not relied upon by the district court.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Maness v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc.
e may affirm a judgment on any ground supported by the record even if not relied upon by the district court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jiricko v. Moser & Marsalek, P.C.
See United States v. Gurley, 43 F.3d 1188, 1199 (8th Cir.1994) (“Whether the present action is the ‘same cause of action’ as the prior action depends on whether it ‘arises out of the same nucleus of operative facts as the prior claim.’ ”) (quoting Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990)), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 817 , 116 S.Ct. 73 , 133 L.Ed.2d 33 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wolf
See Halper, supra. In Kvitka v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 407 Mass. 140 , 551 N.E.2d 915 (1990), cert. denied 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S. Ct. 74 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re DEF Investments, Inc.
See generally Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir.) (claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact are to be given preclusive effect), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cook
See Kvitka v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 407 Mass. 140 , 551 N.E.2d 915, 918 , cert, denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 47 (1990) (administrative fine imposed after physician’s guilty plea was punishment, court noting that licensing board characterized defendant’s actions as “‘a flagrant abuse of public trust’ ” and stated that “ ‘misconduct in the area of prescription practice will not be treated lightly5 ”).
cited
Cited "see"
VanDeWalle v. Albion National Bank
Accord, Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737 (8th Cir. 1990), cert, denied 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S. Ct. 74 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. Madigan
See Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 74 (1990). 3 Allen's claims against Judge Moore fail because Allen has asserted no facts indicating Judge Moore acted outside her judicial capacity.
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Checkett
See Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 74 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matthew B. Goodall, an Infant by His Father and Next Friend, Robert B. Goodall Robert B. Goodall Kathleen N. Goodall v. Stafford County School Board
See Smith v. County of Albemarle, 895 F.2d 953, 959-60 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990); Langlotz v. Picciano, 683 F.Supp. 1041, 1048 (E.D.Va.1988), aff'd, 905 F.2d 1530 (4th Cir.1990) (“Plaintiffs free exercise rights ..., if any, are clearly outweighed by the [state’s] compelling interests in avoiding Establishment Clause violations”). 5 Accordingly, the County’s decision not to provide Matthew with a cued speech interpreter in connection with his attendance at a sectarian school and the prohibitions against its so providing contained in Virgin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peda v. Fort Dodge Animal Health, Inc.
Canady, 282 F.3d at 1014 (citing Hillary, 123 F.3d at 1044 n. 2, and NAACP v. Metropolitan Council, 125 F.3d 1171 , 1174 (8th Cir.1997)); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990); Murphy v. Jones, 877 F.2d 682, 684 (8th Cir.1989); Headley v. Bacon, 828 F.2d 1272, 1274 (8th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shumaker v. Iowa Department of Transportation
(2×)
United States v. Gurley, 43 F.3d 1188, 1195 (8th Cir.1994); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 741 (8th Cir.) (“res judicata precludes the relit-igation of a claim on grounds that were raised or could have been raised in the prior action”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Gurley, Betty Gurley R.A. Caldwell Gurley Refining Company Gurley Refining Company, Inc. William Martin Gurley, United States of America v. Gurley Refining Company, Inc. William Martin Gurley, Larry Gurley Betty Gurley R.A. Caldwell Gurley Refining Company
A prior judgment is binding " ' "not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose." ' " Sea-Land Servs., Inc. v. Gaudet, 414 U.S. 573, 579 , 94 S.Ct. 806, 812 , 39 L.Ed.2d 9 (1974) (quoting Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 597 , 68 S.Ct. 715, 719 , 92 L.Ed. 898 (1948) (quoting Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U.S. 351, 352 , 24 L.Ed. 195 (1876))); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 741 (8th Cir.) ("res judicata precludes the relitigation of a claim on…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gurley
A prior judgment is binding “ ‘ “not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose.” ’ ” Sea-Land Servs., Inc. v. Gaudet, 414 U.S. 573, 579 , 94 S.Ct. 806, 812 , 39 L.Ed.2d 9 (1974) (quoting Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 597 , 68 S.Ct. 715, 719 , 92 L.Ed. 898 (1948) (quoting Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U.S. 351, 352 , 24 L.Ed. 195 (1876))); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 741 (8th Cir.) (“res judicata precludes the relit-igatio…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chabad-Lubavitch of Georgia v. Miller
See Doe, 964 F.2d at 622 (holding complete ban on religious display not narrowly tailored and remanding case); see also Smith v. County of Albemarle, 895 F.2d 953, 960 (4th Cir.) (affirming district court’s finding that complete ban was narrowly tailored), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990); Kaplan v. City of Burlington, 891 F.2d 1024, 1030 (2d Cir.1989) (finding complete ban narrowly tailored), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2619 , 110 L.Ed.2d 640 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chabad-Lubavitch Of Georgia v. Zell Miller
See Doe, 964 F.2d at 622 (holding complete ban on religious display not narrowly tailored and remanding case); see also Smith v. County of Albemarle, 895 F.2d 953, 960 (4th Cir.) (affirming district court's finding that complete ban was narrowly tailored), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990); Kaplan v. City of Burlington, 891 F.2d 1024, 1030 (2d Cir.1989) (finding complete ban narrowly tailored), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926 , 110 S.Ct. 2619 , 110 L.Ed.2d 640 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eubanks v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co. v. Mont Boat Rental Servs., Inc., 799 F.2d 213, 217 (5th Cir.1986); Southmark Properties v. Charles House Corp., 742 F.2d 862, 869 (5th Cir.1984) (where court approved agreement and settlement that a mortgagee could purchase the sole asset of a corporation in reorganization proceedings for the unpaid balance on its claim, res judicata barred a subsequent action arising from same transaction, in which debtor asserted that mortgagee had acted improperly in acquiring title to the asset); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742-44 (8th Cir.) (adopting transact…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
B.R. Eubanks, M.D. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co. v. Mont Boat Rental Servs., Inc., 799 F.2d 213, 217 (5th Cir.1986); Southmark Properties v. Charles House Corp., 742 F.2d 862, 869 (5th Cir.1984) (where court approved agreement and settlement that a mortgagee could purchase the sole asset of a corporation in reorganization proceedings for the unpaid balance on its claim, res judicata barred a subsequent action arising from same transaction, in which debtor asserted that mortgagee had acted improperly in acquiring title to the asset); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742-44 (8th Cir.) (adopting transact…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eubanks v. F.D.I.C.
Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co. v. Mont Boat Rental Servs., Inc., 799 F.2d 213, 217 (5th Cir. 1986); Southmark Properties v. Charles House Corp., 742 F.2d 862, 869 (5th Cir. 1984) (where court approved agreement and settlement that a mortgagee could purchase the sole asset of a corporation in reorganization proceedings for the unpaid balance on its claim, res judicata barred a subsequent action arising from same transaction, in which debtor asserted that mortgagee had acted improperly in acquiring title to the asset); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742-44 (8th Cir.) (adopting transa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis Lufkins v. Walter Leapley, Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark Barnett, Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
(2×)
See, e.g., Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clift C. LANE, et ux.
v.
John E. PETERSON, Jr., etc.
v.
John E. PETERSON, Jr., etc.
No. 89-2009.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
111 S. Ct. 74
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Alaska (2) · Eighth Circuit (2)
Denied.