green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.4 score
“perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Sebe T. Woody
perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gilley
See United States v. Stanley, 928 F.2d 575, 577 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); see also United States v. Rahman, 189 F.3d 88, 128 (2d Cir.1999) (stating that the jury could have concluded that the defendant gave “sometimes false and often strained testimony” at trial because he was conscious of his own guilt), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1094 , 120 S.Ct. 830 , 145 L.Ed.2d 698 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vaughn v. King
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991). 26 The plaintiffs also object to the court's refusal to admit statements made by Ms. Vaughn prior to trial.
cited
Cited "see"
Vaughn v. King
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Otto v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.) ("We repeatedly have made clear that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived (even where those arguments raise constitutional issues)."), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph E. Mayer v. Jeffrey A. Heims, Town of Winamac, Indiana
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 141 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maltby v. Winston
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.) (“We repeatedly have made clear that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived (even where those arguments raise constitutional issues).”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maltby v. Winston
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.) ("We repeatedly have made clear that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived (even where those arguments raise constitutional issues)."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clifford Jones
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1391 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnny Lee Prymer v. Kevin Ogden, Simon Solis, and Mark Hollis
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.) ("A party urging us to reverse a district court's judgment has an obligation to argue why we should reverse that judgment, and to cite appropriate authority to support that argument."), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John E. Sandles
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sandles
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald Nobles, A.K.A. Jamal Asad Sharif v. Linda Hoffman
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.) (Perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, unsupported by pertinent authority are waived), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 141 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Lynn Shetterly
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1382 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); Strickland, 466 U.S. at 695-96 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William E. Miller, William L. Phillips, and Sherry J. Mitchell
(2×)
See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1390 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); Schneider, 930 F.2d at 559 ; Kopp, 951 F.2d at 531 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mann
See, e.g., United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376 (7th Cir. 1991) [cert. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S. Ct. 141 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ramos
See, e.g., United States v. Stanley, 928 F.2d 575, 577 (2d Cir.) (“the jury [is] entitled to disbelieve [the defendant’s] testimony, and use its disbelief to supplement the other evidence against h[er]”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); United States v. Tyler, 758 F.2d 66, 69 (2d Cir.1985) (“the jury has a right to consider the defendant’s lack of credibility in reaching its verdict”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goren v. New Vision International, Inc.
See Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp., 138 F.3d 277, 301 (7th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 336 ,-L.Ed.2d -(1998) (No. 98-179); see also United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.1991) (stating that ”[w]e repeatedly have made clear that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goren v. New Vision International
See Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp., 138 F.3d 277, 301 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 336 , --- L.Ed.2d ---- (1998) (No. 98-179); see also United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.1991) (stating that "[w]e repeatedly have made clear that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived"), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991) 3 The facts alleged in Ms. Goren's complaint are different from those we evaluated in MCM Partners, Inc. v. Andrews-Bartlett & Assocs., Inc.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luis Hernando Ramirez
See, e.g., United States v. Stanley, 928 F.2d 575, 577 (2d Cir.) (“the jury [is] entitled to disbelieve [the defendant’s] testimony, and use its disbelief to supplement the other evidence against him” adduced by the government), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Antoin Novey
See, e.g., United States v. Stanley, 928 F.2d 575, 583 (2d Cir.)(Feinberg, J.) (noting with concern transfer of discretion under Guidelines), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); United States v. Kikumura, 918 F.2d 1084, 1119 (3d Cir.l990)(Rosenn, J., concurring) (transfer of discretion to prosecutor permits “manipulation of ... charge and sentencing”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Aguilar
See, e.g., United States v. Stanley, 928 F.2d 575, 582 (2d Cir.) (“[I]f plea bargains could not alter sentences, most defendants would have little interest in bargaining.”), cer t. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Aulicino, Jr., David Cleary, and Louis Ruggiero, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Stanley, 928 F.2d 575, 577 (2d Cir.) (“the jury [is] entitled to disbelieve [the defendant’s] testimony, and use its disbelief to supplement the other evidence against him” adduced by the government (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 845 , 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); United States v. Tyler, 758 F.2d 66, 69 (2d Cir.1985) (“the jury has a right to consider the defendant’s lack of credibility in reaching its verdict”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rashied L. Springs
See, e.g., United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1391 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Solberg
See also United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1385-86 (7th Cir.) (noting that the chief evil against which the Fourth Amendment is directed is the physical entry of the home and that courts have generally upheld warrantless arrests when a resident answers a police knock on the door and the suspect acquiesces to the arrest), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 L.Ed.2d 108 , 112 S.Ct. 141 (1991). [9] See Smith v. State, 72 Md.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. K'maryan Panadero
See also United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1391 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); Franklin, 902 F.2d at 508 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth T. Hayward, and William B. Krause, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cushing v. City Of Chicago
Likewise, Secs. 3-8-210 and 3-8-230 refer only to accidental injuries in the performance of duty. 15 54 While we have held that "a litigant who fails to press a point [on appeal] by supporting it with pertinent authority, or by showing why it is sound despite a lack of supporting authority or in the face of contrary authority, forfeits the point," Pelfresne v. Village of Williams Bay, 917 F.2d 1017, 1023 (7th Cir.1990) (citations omitted), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 493 , 121 L.Ed.2d 431 (1992); see also United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cushing v. City of Chicago
Likewise, §§ 3-8-210 and 3-8-230 refer only to accidental injuries in the performance of duty. 15 While we have held that “a litigant who fails to press a point [on appeal] by supporting it with pertinent authority, or by showing why it is sound despite a lack of supporting authority or in the face of contrary authority, forfeits the point,” Pelfresne v. Village of Williams Bay, 917 F.2d 1017, 1023 (7th Cir.1990) (citations omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 493 , 121 L.Ed.2d 431 (1992); see also United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. David J. Lindsay and D.J. Lindsay, Inc., David J. Lindsay, Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Lawrence, 928 F.2d 36, 38 (2d Cir.1991) (relevant § 924(c)(1) language “requires the imposition of a sentence that cannot be suspended and cannot be allowed to overlap with any other sentence”); see also United States v. Stanley, 928 F.2d 575, 582 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 141 , 116 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ezeala
v.
Estes, Warden
v.
Estes, Warden
No. 90-8337.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.