green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Bellino
See, generally, State v. Bradley, 236 Neb. 371, 390 , 461 N.W.2d 524, 538 (1990) (cert. denied 502 U.S. 846 , 112 S. Ct. 143 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
DeLozier v. State
See Boltz v. State, 1991 OK CR 1, ¶ 31 , 806 P.2d 1117, 1126 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 846 , 112 S.Ct. 143 , 116 L.Ed.2d 109 (1991) (it is a reasonable strategic choice for an attorney to channel his investigation into fewer than all plausible lines of defense upon which he bases his strategy and his choices on the basis of those assumptions are reasonable.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fields v. State
See Boltz v. State, 806 P.2d 1117, 1125 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 846 , 112 S.Ct. 143 , 116 L.Ed.2d 109 (1991); Foster v. State, 714 P.2d 1031, 1041 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 873 , 107 S.Ct. 249 , 93 L.Ed.2d 173 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. State
(2×)
See Boltz v. State, 806 P.2d 1117, 1123 (Okl.Cr. 1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 143 , 116 L.Ed.2d 109 (1991); Smith v. State 737 P.2d 1206, 1216 (Okl.Cr. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 358 , 98 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987) (hesitancy about death penalty); United States v. Power, 881 F.2d 733, 739-40 (9th Cir.1989) (fidgeting caused concern juror might not be attentive during trial); United States v. Ruiz, 894 F.2d 501, 506 (2d Cir.1990) (facial expressions indicating possible reluctance of juror to sit in trial deemed sufficient reason).
cited
Cited "see"
Lillard v. State
See Boltz v. State, 806 P.2d 1117, 1121 (Okl.Cr.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 143 , 116 L.Ed.2d 109 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nguyen v. State
(2×)
See Boltz v. State, 806 P.2d 1117, 1125 (Okl.Cr. 1991), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 143 , 116 L.Ed.2d 109 (1991); Fox v. State, 779 P.2d 562, 576 (Okl.Cr. 1989), cert. denied 494 U.S. 1060 , 110 S.Ct. 1538 , 108 L.Ed.2d 777 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hooks v. State
See also, Boltz v. State, 806 P.2d 1117, 1124-25 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 846 , 112 S.Ct. 143 , 116 L.Ed.2d 109 (1991). ¶ 11 In Ellis v. State, 867 P.2d 1289, 1300 (Okl.Cr.1992), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 863 , 115 S.Ct. 178 , 130 L.Ed.2d 113 (1994) the Court addressed the issue of the application of OUJI-CR (1st) 442.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gilbert v. State
See also Boltz v. State, 806 P.2d 1117, 1124-25 (Okl.Cr.), cert.denied, 502 U.S. 846 , 112 S.Ct. 143 , 116 L.Ed.2d 109 (1991); Fox v. State, 779 P.2d 562, 574 (Okl.Cr.1989), cert.denied, 494 U.S. 1060 , 110 S.Ct. 1538 , 108 L.Ed.2d 777 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Byron W. Matthews
United States v. Miranda-Ortiz, 926 F.2d 172, 178 (2d Cir.1991); see also United States v. Sanders, 929 F.2d 1466, 1475 (10th Cir.) (drug quantity limited to time of marriage for wife who joined husband’s heroin conspiracy), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 143 , — L.Ed.2d - (1991); United States v. Willard, 909 F.2d 780, 781 (4th Cir.1990) (defendant responsible only for known or reasonably foreseeable criminal conduct in furtherance of conspiracy); cf .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bradley
v.
Nebraska
v.
Nebraska
No. 90-8352.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Published
Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied.