Moody v. Smith, 112 S. Ct. 1562 (1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Moody v. Smith, 112 S. Ct. 1562 (1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“res judicata applies to default judgments and consent judgments as well as to judgments derived from contested trials”
37 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Mannor (mieb, 1994-12-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Mannor
Bankr. E.D. Mich. · 1994 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
res judicata applies to default judgments and consent judgments as well as to judgments derived from contested trials
discussed Cited "see" Norra v. Harris County (In Re Norra)
Bankr. S.D. Tex. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Moody, 77 B.R. 580, 590 (S.D.Tex.1987) (“Bankruptcy courts must resort to state law for an interpretation of state exemption rights in homesteads.”), aff'd, In re Moody, 862 F.2d 1194 , 1201 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, Moody v. Smith, 503 U.S. 960 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992); In re Leonard, 194 B.R. 807, 810 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1996) (“[B]ankruptcy court must look to state law to interpret state homestead exemption rights.”).
discussed Cited "see" In the Matter of Thomas Cullen Davis and Karen Joyce Davis, Debtors. Sandra Davis v. Thomas Cullen Davis (2×)
5th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Moody, 77 B.R. 566, 578 (S.D.Tex.1987), aff'd, 862 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 960 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992).
cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John E. CALHOON, Defendant-Appellant
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Langford, 946 F.2d 798, 801-02 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 960 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Calhoon
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Langford, 946 F.2d 798, 801-02 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 960 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 208 (1992).
cited Cited "see" Davis v. Davis (In Re Davis)
N.D. Tex. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Moody, 77 B.R. 566, 578 (S.D.Tex.1987), aff’d, 862 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 960 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. James Neal Blakeman, as of the Estate of C.E. Blakeman, Deceased, Robert Earl Blakeman and Karen A. Whaley, Defendants-Appellees-Cross- and Cross-Appellees, Ridglea Bank v. Maudine Blakeman, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Moody, 862 F.2d 1194 , 1200 (5th Cir.1989) ("Whether property is rural or urban is a question of fact...."), cert denied sub nom., --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992), aff'g, In re Moody, 77 B.R. 580 (S.D.Tex.1987); In re Spencer, 109 B.R. 715, 716 (W.D.Tex.1989) ("question of rural or urban character is one of fact") (citation omitted); In re Moody, 77 B.R. 580, 591 (S.D.Tex.1987).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. William W. Lilly
1st Cir. · 1992 · signal: accord · confidence high
See, e.g., United States v. Cowden, 545 F.2d 257, 266 (1st Cir.1976) (rejecting similar complaint of jury prejudice), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 1181 , 51 L.Ed.2d 585 (1977); accord United States v. Langford, 946 F.2d 798, 804-05 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Blakeman ex rel. Estate of Blakeman
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Moody, 862 F.2d 1194, 1200 (5th Cir.1989) (“Whether property is rural or urban is a question of fact_”), cert. denied sub nom., — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992), aff'g, In re Moody, 77 B.R. 580 (S.D.Tex.1987); In re Spencer, 109 B.R. 715, 716 (W.D.Tex.1989) (“question of rural or urban character is one of fact”) (citation omitted); In re Moody, 77 B.R. 580, 591 (S.D.Tex.1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." FNFS, Ltd. v. Harwood (In Re Harwood)
Bankr. E.D. Tex. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. v. Bradley, 507 U.S. 971 , 113 S.Ct. 1412 , 122 L.Ed.2d 783 (1993); see also In re Moody, 77 B.R. 580, 590 (S.D.Tex.1987) [“Bankruptcy courts must resort to state law for an interpretation of state exemption rights in homesteads.”], aff'd, In re Moody, 862 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, Moody v. Smith, 503 U.S. 960 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Harwood
Bankr. E.D. Tex. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. v. Bradley, 507 U.S. 971 , 113 S.Ct. 1412 , 122 L.Ed.2d 783 (1993); see also In re Moody, 77 B.R. 580, 590 (S.D.Tex.1987) ["Bankruptcy courts must resort to state law for an interpretation of state exemption rights in homesteads."], aff'd, In re *818 Moody, 862 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, Moody v. Smith, 503 U.S. 960 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Foster
Bankr. E.D. Tex. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. v. Bradley, 507 U.S. 971 , 113 S.Ct. 1412 , 122 L.Ed.2d 783 (1993); see also In re Moody, 77 B.R. 580, 590 (S.D.Tex.1987) ["Bankruptcy courts must resort to state law for an interpretation of state exemption rights in homesteads.”], aff'd by In re Moody, 862 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, Moody v. Smith, 503 U.S. 960 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Eskew
Bankr. W.D. Tex. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Smith v. Moody (In re Moody), 862 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 960 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992) (dicta that the debtor would not have abandoned his homestead rights even if he had granted to another a life estate in the property, where he remained in possession of the property at all times).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Reyes
5th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Woods, 949 F.2d 175 (5th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 961 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 210 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McCullough v. Leventhal (In Re Emergency Networks, Inc.)
N.D. Tex. · 1995 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare In re Moody, 77 B.R. 566, 574 (S.D.Tex.1987) (holding each trustee appointed following conversion from chapter 11 to chapter 13 allotted two years within which to commence avoidance actions), aff’d, 862 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 960 , 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992) with San Joaquin Roast Beef, 7 F.3d at 1416 (holding limitations period runs from date first trustee appointed and binds subsequent trustees).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. William Pollen
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Langford, 946 F.2d 798, 802 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1562 , 118 L.Ed.2d 209 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shearn MOODY, Jr.
v.
W. Steve SMITH, Trustee
No. 91-1329.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1992.
112 S. Ct. 1562
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Denied.