green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
“federal policy strongly favors arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution process”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Eastern Fish Co. v. South Pacific Shipping Co., Ltd.
federal policy strongly favors arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution process
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hashim Al Balad Muhammad v. City of Moreno Valley Code Enforcement
Lujan v Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 , 112 S. Ct. 17 2130, 119 L.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Zheng v. Atty Gen USA
If the BIA rejects the motion to reopen, on an ensuing petition for review a court will uphold that determination if it is “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 , 112 S.Ct. 17 812, 815 (1992) (internal quotation marks omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Chen v. Atty Gen USA
If the BIA rejects the motion to reopen, on an ensuing petition for review a court will uphold that determination if it is “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 , 112 S.Ct. 17 812, 815 (1992) (internal quotation marks omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Winot
(2×)
See Chapman v. United States, 500 U.S. 453, 467-68 , 111 S.Ct. 1919 , 114 L.Ed.2d 524 (rejecting vagueness claim and noting that "whatever debate there is [over meaning of statute] would center around the appropriate sentence and not the criminality of the conduct"), reh. denied, 501 U.S. 1270 , 112 S.Ct. 17 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1101 (1991), superseded by statute as stated in United States v. Clark, 110 F.3d 15 (6th Cir.1997); United States v. White, 882 F.2d 250, 252 (7th Cir.1989) ("Provided that conduct is of a sort widely known among the lay public to be criminal ... a person is not entitled to c…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nichols
(2×)
See Chapman v. United States, 500 U.S. 453, 467 , 111 S.Ct. 1919, 1928-29 , 114 L.Ed.2d 524 (vagueness challenges not invoking the First Amendment must be examined in light of the facts of the case presented), reh’g denied, 501 U.S. 1270 , 112 S.Ct. 17 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1101 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hatzlachh Supply Inc. v. Moishe's Electronics, Inc.
Discussion The Federal Arbitration Act (the “Act”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16 , applies in federal diversity actions where the arbitration provision being construed is in writing and the action relates to a contract evidencing a transaction involving interstate commerce. 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 , 2; see Threlkeld v. Metallgesellschaft, 923 F.2d 245 , 249 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 17 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Courchesne
(2×)
Compare Chapman v. United States, 500 U.S. 453, 467-68 , 111 S.Ct. 1919 , 114 L.Ed.2d 524 (noting, in rejecting due process claim, that "whatever debate there is [over meaning of statute] would center around the appropriate sentence, and not the criminality of the conduct"), reh. denied, 501 U.S. 1270 , 112 S.Ct. 17 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1101 (1991), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in United States v. Clark, 110 F.3d 15 (6th Cir.1997); Knutson v. Brewer, 619 F.2d 747, 750 (8th Cir.1980) (rejecting argument that defendant had due process right to expect to be convicted of lesser crime …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chapman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-5744.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 2, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
500 U. S. 453. Petition for rehearing denied. Petition of Stanley J. Marshall for rehearing denied. *
[Reporter’s Note: Stanley J. Marshall was an appellant in the case below. See United States v. Marshall, 908 F. 2d 1312 (CA7 1990). Marshall’s petition for certiorari was denied in Marshall v. United States, No. 90-929, ante, p. 1205.)