green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dean C. Dauw v. United States
But see Gacy v. Welborn, 994 F.2d 305, 311 (7th Cir.) (en banc) ("Any claim sufficiently novel that it was unavailable during the state proceedings must be a 'new rule' under Teague."), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 269 (1993). 4 We need not consider whether Hughey constitutes a "new rule" entitling Dauw to habeas relief, see Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926, 942 (7th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 3002 (1992), however, because we find Dauw's claim barred by Turino.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry Mahaffey v. Thomas Page, Warden
(2×)
See Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926, 943-45 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1208 , 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry Mahaffey v. Thomas Page, Warden
(2×)
See Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926, 943-45 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1208 , 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Price v. Dixon
See Williams v. Burton, 943 F.2d 1572, 1576 (11th Cir. 1991) (upholding a twenty-eight-hour confinement in four-point restraints where the inmate had a history of disobedience and the potential existed for further disturbances on the segregation unit), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1208 , 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vernard Miles, Jr. v. Donald A. Dorsey, Warden Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
(2×)
See Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926, 933 (7th Cir.1991) (" 'Advice--even strong urging' by counsel does not invalidate a guilty plea.") (quoting Lunz v. Henderson, 533 F.2d 1322, 1327 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 849 , 97 S.Ct. 136 , 50 L.Ed.2d 122 (1976)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992); Uresti v. Lynaugh, 821 F.2d 1099, 1102 (5th Cir.1987) (attorney's threat to withdraw from case if client did not accept plea bargain was insufficient to establish that plea was involuntary).
cited
Cited "see"
Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. Hartigan
See Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926 (7th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992) (Williams I); Williams v. Chrans, 42 F.3d 1137 (7th Cir.1994) (Williams II).
cited
Cited "see"
Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. Hartigan
See Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926, 933-39 (7th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
See, e.g., Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926, 947-48 (7th Cir.1991) (holding that it was not error to exclude proffered evidence of the lack of deterrent value of the death penalty, because it could not be characterized as mitigating evidence bearing on the defendant’s character, prior record, or the circumstances of the offense), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1208 , 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992); Granviel v. Lynaugh, 881 F.2d 185, 189 (5th Cir.1989) (evidence concerning the efficacy of Texas capital statutes was irrelevant to the defendant or his crime and, therefore, was properly exclude…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Honken
See, e.g., Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926, 947-48 (7th Cir. 1991) (holding that it was not error to exclude proffered evidence of the lack of deterrent value of the death penalty, because it could not be characterized as mitigating evidence bearing on the defendant’s character, prior record, or the circumstances of the offense), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1208 , 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992); Granviel v. Lynaugh, 881 F.2d 185, 189 (5th Cir.1989) (evidence concerning the efficacy of Texas capital statutes was irrelevant to the defendant or his crime and, therefore, was properly exclud…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis v. Thurman
See also Williams v. Burton, 943 F.2d 1572, 1574 (11th Cir.1991) (prison officials were justified in placing inmate in four point restraints), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1208 , 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992); Soto v. Dickey, 744 F.2d 1260, 1270 (7th Cir.1984) ("use of mace, tear gas or other chemical agents ... when reasonably necessary to prevent riots or escapes is not a violation of the Eighth Amendment"), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1085 , 105 S.Ct. 1846 , 85 L.Ed.2d 144 (1985); Jones v. Mabry, 723 F.2d 590, 595 (8th Cir.1983) (escape attempt justified requiring inmates to wear leg irons f…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis v. Thurman
See also Williams v. Burton, 943 F.2d 1572, 1574 (11th Cir.1991) (prison officials were justified in placing inmate in four point restraints), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1208, 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992); Soto v. Dickey, 744 F.2d 1260, 1270 (7th Cir.1984) (“use of mace, tear gas or other chemical agents ... when reasonably necessary to prevent riots or escapes is not a violation of the Eighth Amendment”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1085 , 105 S.Ct. 1846 , 85 L.Ed.2d 144 (1985); Jones v. Mabry, 723 F.2d 590, 595 (8th Cir.1983) (escape attempt justified requiring inmates to wear leg iron…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kascell Jennings v. J. Ronald Haws
See also Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926, 932-33 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 3002 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Emerson v. Gramley
See, e.g., Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926, 938-39 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992); Silagy v. Peters, 905 F.2d 986, 990-97 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1110 , 111 S.Ct. 1024 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1106 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patricia R. Sablotny
See also Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926, 951 (7th Cir.1991) (questioning by probation officer, where the defendant called officer and came to probation office, did not defeat voluntariness), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jordan v. Gardner
(2×)
See, e.g., Williams v. Burton, 943 F.2d 1572, 1575-76 (11th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 3002 , 120 L.Ed.2d 877 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas P. Gillespie, Jr.
The defendant, we noted, although compelled to testify at the bankruptcy proceeding, was not in police custody with respect to a criminal investigation, and had offered no reasons why he should not be subject to the rule that “if a witness under compulsion to testify makes disclosures instead of claiming the [fifth amendment] privilege [against self-incrimination], the government has not ‘compelled’ him to incriminate himself.” Id. (quoting Murphy, 465 U.S. at 427 , 104 S.Ct. at 1142 ); see also Williams v. Chrans, 945 F.2d 926 , 951 & n. 42 (7th Cir.1991) (no duty to give Miranda warn…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Burton
v.
Burton
No. 91-8103.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1992.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.