green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
“other states that have considered this question all agree that the accused's demeanor has probative value where his sanity is in issue”
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Falcone v. Taxation Div. Director
But see State By Heitkamp v. Quill Corp., 470 N.W.2d 203 (N.D.), cert. granted —U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 49 , 116 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991); SFA Folio Collections, Inc., No. 89-3015-III, March 11, 1991 (Tenn.Ch. 20th Dist.); Bloomingdale’s by Mail, Ltd., No. 89-3017-II, March 8, 1991 (Tenn.Ch. 20th Dist.).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Rivera
other states that have considered this question all agree that the accused's demeanor has probative value where his sanity is in issue
discussed
Cited "see"
Persyn v. United States
See In re Perry, 918 F.2d 931, 934 (Fed.Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 808 , 112 S.Ct. 49 , 116 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991). “[Ljack of prior misconduct is no excuse for misconduct here.” State Indus., 948 F.2d at 1580 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Nagle James A. Shertzer S. Enola Gochenauer Alan Shaffer Eugene C. Adams George F. Wilt Michael E. Wilt Daniel H. Shertzer and James A. Shertzer and Daniel H. Shertzer, Executors Under the Will of Elva A. Shertzer, Deceased v. David E. Alspach, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Rimar Manufacturing, Inc. Jacques H. Geisenberger, Jr. Marvin Krasny Adelman & Lavine Adelman, Lavine, Krasny, Gold & Levin and Rimar Manufacturing, Inc. v. Paul R. Rosen Spector, Cohen, Hunt & Rosen, P.C. Spector, Cohen, Gadon & Rosen Alan S. Fellheimer Fellheimer, Krakower & Eichen Fellheimer, Eichen & Goodman and Robert I. Martin, Mary Nagle, James A. Shertzer, S. Enola Gochenauer, Alan Shaffer, Eugene C. Adams, George F. Wilt, Michael E. Wilt, Dan H. Shertzer, and James A. Shertzer and Daniel H. Shertzer, Executors Under the Will of Elva A. Shertzer, Deceased and Rimar Manufacturing, Inc.
See In re Perry, 918 F.2d 931, 934-35 (Fed.Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---- ----, 112 S.Ct. 49 -50, 116 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991). 15 Here, appellants challenged only two of the four conclusions asserted by the district court to support its summary judgment for defendants.
cited
Cited "see"
Nagle v. Alspach
See In re Perry, 918 F.2d 931, 934-35 (Fed.Cir.1990), cer t. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 49 -50, 116 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Service Oil, Inc. v. State
(2×)
New Energy, supra; see State v. Quill Corp., 470 N.W.2d 203 (N.D.), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 49 , 116 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nording
Compare Riggins v. Nevada, 107 Nev. 178 , 808 P.2d 535 , cert. granted, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 49 , 116 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991) (May a state force the defendant in a murder case, whose only defense is insanity, to take large doses of an antipsychotic drug during trial?).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Riggins
v.
Nevada
v.
Nevada
No. 90-8466.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: New Jersey Superior Court App … (1)
Sup. Ct. Nev. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.