green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paredes-Batista
See United States v. Charria, 919 F.2d 842, 849 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 62 , 116 L.Ed.2d 38 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Sarabyn
See S.J. & W Ranch, Inc. v. Lehtinen, 913 F.2d 1538, 1542-44 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 62 , 116 L.Ed.2d 37 (1991); Brown v. Armstrong, 949 F.2d 1007, 1011 (8th Cir.1991); Kimbro v. Velten, 30 F.3d 1501, 1509 (D.C.Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eddie D. Church and Cherri Church v. General Motors Corp.
See Savic v. United States, 918 F.2d 696, 703 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 62 , 116 L.Ed.2d 38 (1991) (holding that defendant was not in charge in spite of its inspectors’ testimony “that they would only become involved with the work of the individual laborers when and if they observed immediate danger to ‘life and limb,’ where someone could get hurt”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Love
Patterson, 487 U.S. at 298 , 108 S.Ct. at 2397 ; see United States v. Charria, 919 F.2d 842, 848 (2d Cir.1990) (“[G]iving an indicted defendant Miranda warnings is sufficient to make ‘knowing and intelligent’ his waiver of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, even if the defendant has not been expressly informed of the indictment pending against him.”), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 112 S.Ct. 62 , 116 L.Ed.2d 38 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Halliburton Co.
See Simmers v. American Cyanamid Corp., 394 Pa.Super. 464 , 576 A.2d 376, 390 (1990) (“In Pennsylvania, it is now the law that when the successor is subject to the liabilities of its predecessor, the acts of a predecessor corporation may be attributed to its successor for the purposes of determining whether jurisdiction is proper.”), appeal denied, 527 Pa. 649 , 593 A.2d 421 , cert. denied sub nom., Chromalloy Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Boyer, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 62 , 116 L.Ed.2d 38 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bendle Chadwick
See United States v. Charria, 919 F.2d 842, 848 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 62, 116 L.Ed.2d 38 (1991); Riddick v. Edmiston, 894 F.2d 586, 590-91 (3rd Cir.1990); United States v. Muca, 945 F.2d 88, 90-91 (4th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 983 , 117 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992); Quadrini v. Clusen, 864 F.2d 577, 585-87 (7th Cir.1989); Norman v. Ducharme, 871 F.2d 1483, 1487 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1031 , 110 S.Ct. 1483 , 108 L.Ed.2d 619 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Remini
(2×)
See United States v. Charria, 919 F.2d 842, 849 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 62 , 116 L.Ed.2d 38 , 112 S.Ct. 62 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Ashley v. Abbott Laboratories
See generally Simmers v. American Cyanamid Corp., 394 Pa.Super. 464 , 576 A.2d 376 (1990) (discussing such cases), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 62 , 116 L.Ed.2d 38 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re DES Cases
See generally Simmers v. American Cyanamid Corp., 394 Pa.Super. 464 , 576 A.2d 376 (1990) (discussing such cases), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 62 , 116 L.Ed.2d 38 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joe Lambright v. Charles Ryan
See, e.g., Wilderness Soc’y v. Babbitt, 5 F.3d 383 , 387 (9th Cir.1993) ("The court's decision ... is not implausible and, based upon this factor alone, the court's decision would not be considered an abuse of discretion.”); see also Savic v. United States, 918 F.2d 696, 700 (7th Cir.1990) ("A finding is clearly erroneous when, although there may be some evidence to support it,’ the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’ We may have such a conviction if the trial judge’s interpretation of the facts is i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hinkson
(2×)
See, e.g., Wilderness Soc'y v. Babbitt, 5 F.3d 383 , 387 (9th Cir.1993) ("The court's decision... is not implausible and, based upon this factor alone, the court's decision would not be considered an abuse of discretion."); see also Savic v. United States, 918 F.2d 696, 700 (7th Cir. 1990) ("A finding is clearly erroneous when, although there may be some evidence to support it, `the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.' We may have such a conviction if the trial judge's interpretation of the facts is implausible…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James
See Patterson v. Illinois, 487 U.S. at 291-96 , 108 S.Ct. 2389 ; see also United States v. Charria, 919 F.2d 842, 848 (2d Cir.1990) (holding that Miranda warnings are sufficient to effect a valid waiver of Sixth Amendment rights post-indictment and that it is not constitutionally required that the defendant be informed that he is under indictment) (superseded by regulation on other grounds), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 62 , 116 L.Ed.2d 38 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charria
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-1794.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.