Lidman v. Newark Redevelopment & Hous. Auth., 502 U.S. 1040 (1992). · Go Syfert
Lidman v. Newark Redevelopment & Hous. Auth., 502 U.S. 1040 (1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Roman (me, 1993-03-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Roman
Me. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See M.R.Crim.P. 52(b); State v. Goodrich, 432 A.2d 413, 416 (Me.1981); see also Field & Murray, § 105.2 at 1-47 (“It is the obligation of counsel to request the limiting instruction”). 4 In State v. Gifford, 595 A.2d 1049 (Me.1991), cert. denied — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 893 , 116 L.Ed.2d 795 (1992), we were faced with the identical issue in another prosecution for gross sexual misconduct.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lidman
v.
Newark Redevelopment and Housing Authority
No. 91-6313.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1992.
502 U.S. 1040
Published

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.