green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bursik v. One Fourth Street North, Ltd.
See 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1057 , 112 S.Ct. 933 , 117 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992); Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 397-400 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); In re Landmark Land Co. of Oklahoma, 973 F.2d 283 (4th Cir.1992); Gross v. Bell Savings Bank PaSA, 974 F.2d 403 (3d Cir.1992); Telematics International, Inc. v. NEMLC Leasing Corp., 967 F.2d 703, 705-6 (1st Cir.1992); United Liberty Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bursik v. One Fourth Street North, Ltd.
See 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1057 , 112 S.Ct. 933 , 117 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992); Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 397-400 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); In re Landmark Land Co. of Oklahoma, 973 F.2d 283 (4th Cir.1992); Gross v. Bell Savings Bank PaSA, 974 F.2d 403 (3d Cir.1992); Telematics International, Inc. v. NEMLC Leasing Corp., 967 F.2d 703, 705-6 (1st Cir.1992); United Liberty Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Keithian L. Arnold v. Boatmen's Trust Company
See Bradley v. Pizzaco of Neb., Inc., 939 F.2d 610 , 612 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 933 (1992). 3 We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Arnold's motions for a default judgment and recusal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lloyd v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir.1991) (injunction against receiver’s foreclosure of appellants’ property barred by *337 § 1821(j)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 933 , 117 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Earl Jasper Willie J. Johnson Jimmy R. Johnson Thomas Terry, Willie Battles v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
See Bradley v. Pizzaco of Nebraska, Inc., 939 F.2d 610, 612-13 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 933 (1992); see also Fisher v. Transco Servs.-Milwaukee, Inc., 979 F.2d 1239, 1244-45 (7th Cir. 1992). 4 We review district court findings of fact for clear error.
discussed
Cited "see"
Keithian L. Arnold v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Community Federal
See Bradley v. Pizzaco of Neb., Inc., 939 F.2d 610 , 612 (8th Cir. 1991) (Title VII forbids employment practices with significant disparate impact on blacks unless practice is justified by legitimate employment goals), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 933 (1992). 8 The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Arnold's motion for default judgment.
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Imperial Savings
See 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 933 , 117 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
William C. Davidson, P.C. v. Mills
See 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir.1991) cert. denied — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 933 , 117 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bezanson v. FDIC
See ___ Lloyd v. FDIC, 22 F.3d 335, 336 (1st Cir. 1994) (interpreting _____ ____ these statutes as affording the FDIC the "power as receiver to foreclose on the property of a debtor"); see also 281-300 Joint ___ ____ _____________ Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir. 1991) (holding that _______ _____ "the ability of the conservator to foreclose on the property of a debtor [is] a power that Congress gave to [agencies like the FDIC] under FIRREA"), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 933 (1992); Abbott _____ ______ ______ Bldg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bezanson v. FDIC
See Lloyd v. FDIC, 22 F.3d 335, 336 (1st Cir. 1994) (interpreting these statutes as affording the FDIC the "power as receiver to foreclose on the property of a debtor"); see also 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir. 1991) (holding that "the ability of the conservator to foreclose on the property of a debtor [is] a power that Congress gave to [agencies like the FDIC] under FIRREA"), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 933 (1992); Abbott Bldg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sunshine Development, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent for First Service Bank for Savings
See Lloyd v. FDIC, 22 F.3d 335, 336 (1st Cir.1994) (interpreting these statutes as affording the FDIC the “power as receiver to foreclose on the property of a debtor”); see also 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir.1991) (holding that “the ability of the conservator to foreclose on the property of a debtor [is] a power that Congress gave to [agencies like the FDIC] under FIRREA”), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 933 , 117 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992); Abbott Bldg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry S. Ward v. Resolution Trust Corporation
See id. at 258 ("It is clear from this statute that the RTC receiver is free to perform its functions, which include the liquidation of receivership assets, without being encumbered by the possibility of injunctive actions”); see also 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 933 , 117 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992) ("[R]egardless of [the] likelihood of success on the underlying claims” in-junctive relief against the RTC cannot be granted.). 5 . 938 F.2d at 39 . 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ward v. Resolution Trust Corp.
As we observed in 281-300 Joint Venture,5 by virtue of § 1821(j) "[t]he courts lack t he ability to enjoin [actions] that are within the statutory powers of the RTC as conservator or receiver." In sustaining the denial of injunction, we there found that, whether acting 4 See id. at 258 ("It is clear from this statute that the RTC receiver is free to perform its functions, which include the liquidation of receivership assets, without being encumbered by the possibility of injunctive actions"); see also 281-3000 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nathanial Turner, Jr. v. Lloyd Buckmaster
See EEOC v. Trailways, Inc., 530 F.Supp. 54, 56 (D.Colo.1981); see also Bradley v. Pizzaco, Inc., 939 F.2d 610 , 612 (8th Cir.1991) (half of all black males suffer from PFB, but only in severe cases must the sufferer abstain from shaving altogether), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 933 (1992); EEOC v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 635 F.2d 188, 195 (3d Cir.1980) (Sloviter, J., dissenting).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dossett
v.
Georgia
v.
Georgia
No. 91-519.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1992.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.