green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.7 score
“in the context of conspiracy, severance will rarely, if ever, be required.”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Brandon
in the context of conspiracy, severance will rarely, if ever, be required.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Goodchild
See, ___ e.g., United States v. McGill, 952 F.2d ____ _____________ ______ 16, 19 (1st Cir. 1992); United States v. _____________ Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 309 (1st Cir. _______ 1991), cert. denied, ____ U.S. ____, 112 _____ ______ S. Ct. 986, 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992); United ______ States v. Hunnewell, 891 F.2d 955 , 956 ______ _________ (1st Cir. 1989); United States v. Costa, _____________ _____ 890 F.2d 480, 482-83 (1st Cir. 1989); United States v. Hoyos-Medina, 878 F.2d _____________ ____________ 21, 22 (1st Cir. 1989); United States v. _____________ Carter, 815 F.2d 827, 829 (1st Cir. ______ …
discussed
Cited "see"
Genius v. Pepe
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 310 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1079 , 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Darryl Nimrod v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Nimrod, 940 F.2d 1186 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1079 , 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanchez Barreto
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 309 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1079 , 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz-Martinez
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 309 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1079 , 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992); United States v. Hunnewell, 891 F.2d 955, 956 (1st Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Levy-Cordero, United States v. William Romero-Lewis, A/K/A Caco, El Teniente, United States v. Jose Samuel Forty-Estremera, A/K/A Sammy
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 313 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1079 , 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992). 64 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Levy-Cordero
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 313 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1079 , 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Collins
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 309 (1st Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1079 , 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Adkisson
(4×)
See State v. Woods, 806 S.W.2d 205, 210 (Tenn.Crim.App. 1990), cert, denied, 502 U.S. 1079 , 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Scarpa v. Dubois
See United States v. Natanel, 938 ___ _____________ _______ F.2d 302, 310 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 986 _____ ______ (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Scarpa v. Dubois
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 310 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 986 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David A. Patterson
See U.S. v. Natanel (1st Cir.1991) 938 F.2d 302, 313 , cert. den. — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 *580 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992) (decision on motion for new trial will not be overturned except for “a manifest abuse of discretion”); U.S. v. Seago (6th Cir.1991) 930 F.2d 482, 488 (ruling on motion for new trial will not be reversed absent a “clear abuse of discretion”). 3 Accordingly, the order granting new trial is AFFIRMED. 1 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Nazzaro Scarpa v. Larry E. Dubois, Etc.
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 310 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Welch
See United States v. Figueroa, 976 F.2d 1446 , 1452 ___ _____________ ________ (1st Cir. 1992) (citing United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302 , _____________ _______ 308 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 986 (1992)), cert. _____ ______ _____ denied, 113 S. Ct. 1346 (1993). ______ Next, appellants argue that severance was required because evidence of their pre-majority conduct was admissible against all their codefendants, but not against them.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Welch
(2×)
See United States v. Figueroa, 976 F.2d 1446 , 1452 (1st Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 308 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1346 , 122 L.Ed.2d 728 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Natanel
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302 (1st Cir. 1991) (affirming conviction on direct appeal), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 986 (1992).1 The offense occurred in May 1987.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Efraim Natanel
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302 (1st Cir. 1991) (affirming conviction on direct appeal), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 986 (1992). 1 The offense occurred in May 1987.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Natanel
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d ___ _____________ _______ 302 (1st Cir. 1991) (affirming conviction on direct appeal), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 986 (1992).1 The offense occurred ____________ in May 1987.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fisher
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 309 (1st Cir.1991) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Alfredo Alvarado, United States v. Juan Eugenio Lorenzi-Padilla
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 311 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alfredo Alvarado
See United States v. ___ _________________ Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 311 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, _______ _____ ______ 112 S.Ct. 986 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frances Slade
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 313 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 .(1992); United States v. Martin, 815 F.2d 818, 824 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 825 , 108 S.Ct. 89 , 98 L.Ed.2d 51 (1987); United States v. Wright, 625 F.2d 1017, 1019 (1st Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angel Luis Figueroa, United States of America v. Tomas Figueroa, United States of America v. Isabel Rivera-Serrano, United States of America v. Carmen Milagros-Vasquez
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 308 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992) (in reviewing rulings on motions for severance, appellate courts consistently find comfort in such cautionary instructions).
discussed
Cited "see"
United State v. Figueroa
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 308 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992) (in reviewing rulings on motions for severance, appellate courts consistently find comfort in such cautionary instructions).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kamel Kamel and Musa Khabbas
(2×)
See United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 314 (1st Cir.1991) (affidavit undermining portion of witness’ testimony merely impeached his credibility, and was not "material"), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992); United States v. Provost, 921 F.2d 163, 164-65 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1603 , 113 L.Ed.2d 666 (1991). 23 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Webb
(2×)
See also United States v. Natanel, 938 F.2d 302, 306 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 986 , 117 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lowery
v.
Fernwood Industries, Inc.
v.
Fernwood Industries, Inc.
No. 91-6629.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1992.
Cited by 74 opinions | Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.