green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hillman v. United States Postal Service
See United States v. Carter, 973 F.2d 1509, 1513 (10th Cir.1992) (“We presume jurors will remain true to their oath and conscientiously follow the trial court’s instructions.”), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 922 , 113 S.Ct. 1289 , 122 L.Ed.2d 681 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Anderson, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Davern, 970 F.2d 1490, 1492-93 (6th Cir.1992) (en banc), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 923 , 113 S.Ct. 1289 , 122 L.Ed.2d 681 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES v. DeRIGGI
See United States v. Davern, 970 F.2d 1490, 1492 (6th Cir.1992) (en banc ), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1289 , 122 L.Ed.2d 681 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. DeRiggi
See United States v. Davern, 970 F.2d 1490, 1492 (6th Cir.1992) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1289 , 122 L.Ed.2d 681 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip Charles Brown, United States of America v. Isaac Baylis, United States of America v. Robert Mark Brown, A/K/A Melvin Williams
See United States v. Davern, 937 F.2d 1041 (6th Cir.1991), vacated, 970 F.2d 1490 (6th Cir.1992) (en banc ), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1289 , 122 L.Ed.2d 681 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David W. Duerson
See generally United States v. Davern, 970 F.2d 1490, 1496-97 (6th Cir.1992) (Nelson, J., concurring), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1289 , 122 L.Ed.2d 681 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Lloyd Patterson
See United States v. Carter, 973 F.2d 1509, 1515 (10th Cir.1992) (“In the absence of a proper objection at trial, we must first conduct a plain error analysis.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1289 , 122 L.Ed.2d 681 (1993). *815 The plain error analysis requires the court of appeals to view the trial record as a whole to determine if the error seriously affected the fairness of the trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jubal Carson
See United States v. Davern, 970 F.2d 1490, 1494 (6th Cir.1992) (en banc) (an offense level is determined on the basis of the defendant's relevant conduct, not just the acts charged in the count of conviction), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1289 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leslie Crawford
See United States v. Davern, 970 F.2d 1490, 1498 (6th Cir.1992) (majority rejects defendant’s argument that an undercover agent enticed him into buying more than he would have ordinarily purchased by offering “this great bargain price”), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1289 , 122 L.Ed.2d 681 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eddie Maes v. John Thomas, Warden and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
See, e.g., Nickerson v. Lee, 971 F.2d 1125, 1138 (4th Cir.1992) (failure to give self-defense instruction even where sufficient evidence to warrant it did not rise to due process violation), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1289 , 122 L.Ed.2d 681 (1993); Frey v. Leapley, 931 F.2d 1253,1255 (8th Cir.1991) (failure to give appropriate theory-of-defense instruction, without more, is not a due process violation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willie Lloyd Turner v. David A. Williams, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center
(2×)
In the latter, "it is necessary to inquire whether granting the relief sought would create a new rule because the prior decision is applied in a novel setting, thereby extending the precedent." Stringer v. Black, --- U.S. ----, ----, 112 S.Ct.1130, 1135, 117 L.Ed.2d 367 (1992); see also Nickerson v. Lee, 971 F.2d 1125 , 1132 n. 12 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1289 , 122 L.Ed.2d 681 (1993). 17 The policy behind the new rule principle is desirable; but applying that principle leaves something to be desired, for "[i]t is admittedly often difficult to determine when a cas…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury
v.
Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury
No. 92-6331.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1993.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.