green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Prieto v. Com.
See Smith v. Commonwealth, 239 Va. 243, 267 , 389 S.E.2d 871, 884 (1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 221 , 112 L.Ed.2d 177 (1990), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 848 , 113 S.Ct. 142 , 121 L.Ed.2d 95 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell Edward Eggleston
See United States v. Horr, 963 F.2d 1124, 1126 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 848 , 113 S.Ct. 143 , 121 L.Ed.2d 95 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell E. Eggleston
See United States v. Horr, 963 F.2d 1124, 1126 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 848 (1992). -3- Defendant's third argument relates to an incident that occurred during the closing argument to the jury.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lawrence
The first of those is when the sentence itself is illegal, namely, when the sentence “either exceeds the relevant statutory maximum limits, violates a defendant’s right against double jeopardy, is ambiguous, or is internally contradictory.” State v. McNellis, 15 Conn. App. 416, 443-44 , 546 A.2d 292 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 809 , 548 A.2d 441 (1988); see also United States v. Pavlico, 961 F.2d 440, 443 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 848 , 113 S. Ct. 144 , 121 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reed
v.
Indiana
v.
Indiana
No. 91-8547.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
Published
Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.