green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Quigley v. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERV., LLC
See Baylson v. Disciplinary Bd. of the Supreme Court of Pa., 975 F. 2d 102, 107, 111-12 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 984 , 113 S.Ct. 1578 , 123 L.Ed. 2d 147 (1993); see also Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1, 9-16 , 61 S.Ct. 422, 424-27 , 85 L.Ed. 479, 483-86 (1941) (discussing Congress's delegation of rule-making power to the Judiciary to adopt rules of civil procedure).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Search of Premises of Wilson
See Baylson v. Disciplinary Bd. of Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 764 F.Supp. 328 (E.D.Pa.1991) (federal district court, in addition to judicial council of circuit, has authority to pass on validity of local rule), aff'd, 975 F.2d 102 (3d Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 507 U.S. 984 , 113 S.Ct. 1578 , 123 L.Ed.2d 147 (1993); see, e.g., Porter v. Fox, 99 F.3d 271 (8th Cir.1996) (court of appeals has power to strike down local rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
Northland Insurance v. Shell Oil Co.
A local rule shall be consistent with — but not duplicative of — Acts of Congress and rules adopted under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2072 and 2075[J Fed.R.Civ.P. 83(a); See Baylson v. Disciplinary Bd. of Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 764 F.Supp. 328, 330 (E.D.Pa.1991), aff'd. 975 F.2d 102 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied 507 U.S. 984 , 113 S.Ct. 1578 , 123 L.Ed.2d 147 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morstein v. National Insurance Services, Inc.
(2×)
See Sanson v. General Motors, 966 F.2d 618, 623 (11th Cir.1992) (Birch, J., dissenting), cert. denied, - -- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1578 , 123 L.Ed.2d 146 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pipkin v. Mortgage Creditcorp, Inc.
See Baylson v. Disciplinary Bd. of the Supreme Court of Pa., 975 F.2d 102, 111-12 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1578 (1993) (state rule of professional conduct requiring federal prosecutors to obtain judicial approval before subpoenaing any attorney was preempted because it imposed additional conditions not contemplated by Congress). 22 Although Mr. Pipkin asserts otherwise, the preemption of Section 13.001(a) harms no property interests here.
discussed
Cited "see"
Grievance Committee for the Southern District of New York v. Robert M. Simels
See Baylson v. Disciplinary Board, 975 F.2d 102 (3d Cir.1992) (invalidating state ethics rule that attempted to interfere with federal grand jury practice), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1578 , 123 L.Ed.2d 147 (1993); Almond v. United States District Court, 852 F.Supp. 78, 87 (D.R.I.1994) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama
Clark v. Coats and Clark, Inc., 865 F.2d 1237, 1243 (11th Cir.1989); see Sanson v. General Motors, 966 F.2d 618 (11th Cir.1992) (holding that the employee’s state law claim of false misrepresentation against employer where the employer misrepresented the availability of benefits was preempted by ERISA), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1578 , 123 L.Ed.2d 146 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fairport International Exploration, Inc. v. the Shipwrecked Vessel
See, e.g., United States v. Steinmetz, 973 F.2d 212, 222-23 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 984 , 113 S.Ct. 1578 , 123 L.Ed.2d 146 (1993); cf. United States v. Pennsylvania & Lake Erie Dock Co., 272 F. 839, 843 (6th Cir.1921) (explaining that, once the government acquires title to land, it cannot abandon it without an express congressional declaration).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fairport International Exploration, Inc. v. Shipwrecked Vessel
See, e.g., United States v. Steinmetz, 973 F.2d 212, 222-23 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 984 , 113 S.Ct. 1578 , 123 L.Ed.2d 146 (1993); cf. United States v. Pennsylvania & Lake Erie Dock Co., 272 F. 839, 843 (6th Cir.1921) (explaining that, once the government acquires title to land, it cannot abandon it without an express congressional declaration).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vartanian v. Monsanto Company
See Smith v. Durham-Bush, Inc., ___ _____ _________________ 959 F.2d 6, 11-12 (2d Cir. 1992); see also Sanson v. General _________ ______ _______ Motors Corp., 966 F.2d 618, 621 (11th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, ___________ ____________ 113 S. Ct. 1578 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vartanian v. Monsanto Company
See Smith v. Durham-Bush, Inc., 959 F.2d 6, 11-12 (2d Cir;1992); see also Sanson v. General Motors Corp., 966 F.2d 618, 621 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1578 , 123 L.Ed.2d 146 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Billotti
v.
Legursky, Warden
v.
Legursky, Warden
No. 92-967.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1993.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.