Copado v. United States, 507 U.S. 997 (1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Copado v. United States, 507 U.S. 997 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
65 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Raymond Rybar, Jr. (ca3, 1996-12-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Raymond Rybar, Jr. (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016, 1020 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993); United States v. Oakes, 564 F.2d 384, 387 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 1493 , 55 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978); United States v. Warin, 530 F.2d 103, 106 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 948 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard Craddock (2×)
5th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993); United States v. Evans, 928 F.2d 858 (9th Cir.1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jerry Butler
7th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Johnson, 26 F.3d at 695 (citing United States v. Olson, 978 F.2d 1472, 1478 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993)) (“incredulous” that persons not associated with drug dealer would be allowed to live in house where large drug conspiracy conducted).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. William J. Kirk (2×)
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016, 1018 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993); United States v. Evans, 928 F.2d 858 (9th Cir.1991).
cited Cited "see" Michael Hoggard v. James Purkett, Superintendent
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016 , 1018 n. 2 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993); United States v. Halverson, 973 F.2d 1415, 1417 (8th Cir.1992).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Arnold L. Hollingsworth, Jr. And William A. Pickard, III (2×)
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Olson, 978 F.2d 1472, 1483 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, Y--- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 , 175 (1993). 88 There is, of course, no constitutional requirement that the Congress punish only activity that is immediately dangerous.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Arnold L. Hollingsworth, Jr. And William A. Pickard, III (2×)
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Olson, 978 F.2d 1472, 1483 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993) 5 The majority's attempt to distinguish United States v. Ulloa, 882 F.2d 41 (2d Cir.1989), on the ground that it antedates Jacobson v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1535 , 118 L.Ed.2d 174 (1992), belies its attempt elsewhere in the opinion to reassure that, while the new test may seem new, it had been implicit in the traditional approach.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Walter Howard Butler
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Olson, 978 F.2d 1472, 1482 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993).
cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM J. KIRK
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016, 1015 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, ____ U.S. ____, 113 S. Ct. 1614 (1993); United States v. Evans, 928 F.2d 858 (9th Cir. 1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James Herriman
7th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, the court directed that the issue not be raised by either side because “there’s too much potential for confusion and speculation if it is brought up.” Gene Robbins contends that the district court’s refusal to allow that area of cross-examination violated the Confrontation Clause. “[A] district court’s Rule 403 balancing is afforded a special degree of deference: [o]nly in an extreme case are appellate judges competent to second- *844 guess the judgment of the person on the spot, the trial judge.” United States v. Dillard, 43 F.3d 299, 305 (7th Cir.1994) (internal quotat…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Brecunier
Iowa · 1997 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Hickman v. Block, 81 F.3d 98, 101 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996) (holding that "the Second Amendment is a right held by the states, and does not protect the possession of a weapon by a private citizen”), with United States v. Gomez, 92 F.3d 770 , 774 n. 7 (9th Cir.1996) ("[t]he Second Amendment embodies the right to defend oneself and one’s home against physical attack”), and United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016, 1020 (8th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993) (purpose of Second Amendment "…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Copado
v.
United States
No. 92-7533.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1993.
507 U.S. 997
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.