green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Skamania County v. Woodall
See generally Columbia River Gorge United-Protecting People & Prop. v. Yeutter, 960 F.2d 110 , 112 (9th Cir.) (giving an overview of this process), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Skamania County v. Woodall
See generally Columbia River Gorge United-Protecting People & Prop. v. Yeutter, 960 F.2d 110 , 112 (9th Cir.) (giving an overview of this process), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 128 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Desantiago-Flores
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285 , -8- 1293 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 506 U.S. 863 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruben Desantiago-Flores
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285, 1293 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alameda Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Oakland, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, Newspaper Guild, Intervenor-Appellant
See North Mississippi Communications, Inc. v. Jones, 792 F.2d 1330, 1336-37 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992) (holding that “[although the Times may have had no ‘right’ to receive certain legal advertisements from the County Board of Supervisors, it would violate the Constitution for the Board to withhold public patronage, in the form of its advertising, from the Times in retaliation for that newspapers exercise of its first amendment rights ... by publishing editorials and news stories critical of the Board and its members”); Review Pu…
discussed
Cited "see"
Finegold, Alexander + Associates, Inc. v. Setty & Associates, Ltd.
See S & M Constructors, Inc. v. FoleyCo., 959 F.2d 97 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992); see also United States v. Munsey Trust Co., 332 U.S. 234, 241 , 67 S.Ct. 1599, 1602-03 , 91 L.Ed. 2022 (1947); United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730, 737 , 64 S.Ct. 820, 823-24 , 88 L.Ed. 1039 (1944); Merritt v. United States, 267 U.S. 338, 341 , 45 S.Ct. 278, 279 , 69 L.Ed. 643 (1925); American Fidelity Co. v. National City Bank of Evansville, 266 F.2d 910, 916 (D.C.Cir.1959); S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jaime Ramos, Jose Angel Castorena, Andres Ramos, Armando Espinosa, and Jose Alvaro Cervantes
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992). 14 . 486 U.S. 153 , 108 S.Ct. 1692 , 100 L.Ed.2d 140 (1988). 15 . 569 F.2d 1318, 1323 (5th Cir.1978).
Smith (Widow of Smith)
v.
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department of Labor
v.
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department of Labor
No. 92-46.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
506 U.S. 863
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.