green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Andersen v. McCotter
But see Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1136 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); Janusaitis v. Middlebury Volunteer Fire Dep’t, 607 F.2d 17, 25 (2d Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Hill and Griffith Co. v. Bryant
See Braden v. South Main Bank, 837 S.W.2d 733, 742 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, writ denied), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); see also Cap Rock Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cohen v. San Bernardino Valley College
Id. at 1197 ; see Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1139 (9th Cir.1992) (holding that juvenile hall volunteer could not be penalized for sending memorandum critical of juvenile hall management to judges and the governing agencies), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); Burgess v. Pierce County, 918 F.2d 104, 106 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam) (holding that fire marshall’s opposition to county ordinance was protected speech on a matter of public concern); Allen v. Scribner, 812 F.2d 426, 431 (9th Cir.), amended, 828 F.2d 1445 (9th Cir.1987) (holding that state entomol…
cited
Cited "see"
V. Elizabeth Gini v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
See Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir.1992) (discussing cases), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Attorney General of Texas Ex Rel. State v. Cartwright
See Braden v. South Main Bank, 837 S.W.2d 733, 737 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, writ denied), cert denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Bobbie L. Celestine v. City of San Jose Murray Levison Judy Jones T. Larussa William Pope Cleon Eccles Joan Taylor
See Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1135 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2337 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. School Bd. for Santa Rosa County, Fla.
While there is no protected right to serve as a parent volunteer, the Supreme Court has emphasized that even though a person has no right to a government benefit and it may be denied for any number of reasons, the government “may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected interests—especially, his interest in freedom of speech." Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 597 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); see also Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1135 (9th Cir.1992) (holding "the opportunity to serve as a volunteer constitutes the type of gove…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rendish v. City of Tacoma
See 123 F.3d at 1224 -25 (citing Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 142 , 103 S.Ct. 1684, 1690 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 ); see also Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1139 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 668, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 871 Kimberly Rendish v. City of Tacoma Ray C. Corpuz, City Manager for the City of Tacoma, in His Individual Capacity Robin Jenkinson, City Attorney for the City of Tacoma, in Her Individual Capacity John Kouklis, Chief Assistant City Attorney for the City of Tacoma, in His Individual Capacity John Does 1-10, in Their Individual Capacities Jane Does 1-10, in Their Individual Capacities
See 123 F.3d at 1224 -25 (citing Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 142 , 103 S.Ct. 1684, 1690 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 ); see also Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1139 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chateaubriand v. Gaspard
See, e.g., Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1137 (9th Cir.1992) (memorandum exposing abuses, inefficiency, threats to public safety, potential civil rights violations, and incompetence of law enforcement officials, addressed matters of public concern), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); Burgess, 918 F.2d at 106 (public employee's speech opposing ordinances believed to conflict with state standards related to matters of public concern). 33 The form and context of Chateaubriand's speech does not detract from its public character.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard L. Brown v. Disciplinary Committee of the Edgerton Volunteer Fire Department, Edgerton Fire Protection District Commission, Kenneth Crandal
See also Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993) (experience and status that often accompany a volunteer position can make the position a benefit or privi *973 lege which could be taken away unconstitutionally).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chateaubriand v. Gaspard
See, e.g., Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1137 (9th Cir.1992) (memorandum exposing abuses, inefficiency, threats to public safety, potential civil rights violations, and incompetence of law enforcement officials, addressed matters of public concern), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); Burgess, 918 F.2d at 106 (public employee’s speech opposing ordinances believed to conflict with state standards related to matters of public concern).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Suzik and Roxanne Suzik v. Sea-Land Corporation, Sea-Land Services, Incorporated, and Csx Corporation
See, e.g., Lee v. Chicago Transit Auth., 152 Ill.2d 432 , 178 Ill.Dec. 699, 708-09 , 605 N.E.2d 493, 502-03 (1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); Jefferson v. City of Chicago, 269 Ill.App.3d 672 , 207 Ill.Dec. 218, 221-22 , 646 N.E.2d 1305, 1308-09 (1 Dist.1995); Smith v. Armor Plus Co., Inc., 248 Ill.App.3d 831 , 187 Ill.Dec. 625, 632 , 617 N.E.2d 1346, 1353 (2 Dist.1993); Laflin v. Estate of Mills, 53 Ill.App.3d 29 , 10 Ill.Dec. 927, 932 , 368 N.E.2d 522, 527 (1 Dist.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. County of Los Angeles Fire Department
The Ninth Circuit has given a broad interpretation to the requirement that a matter be of public concern: “Speech that can fairly be considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community is constitutionally protected.” Gillette v. Delmore, 886 F.2d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir.1989) (emphasis added) (fire fighter’s criticism of other fire fighters is of public concern); see also Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993) (memorandum criticizing agency of inefficiency and abuse is of publi…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cap Rock Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.
See also Braden v. South Main Bank, 837 S.W.2d 733, 742 (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schulze
v.
South Main Bank
v.
South Main Bank
No. 92-1476.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1993.
Published
Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied.