Maryland v. Ott, 506 U.S. 904 (1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Maryland v. Ott, 506 U.S. 904 (1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“eopardy attaches once the jury has been selected and sworn”
45 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Brown (conn, 1997-08-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Brown
Conn. · 1997 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
eopardy attaches once the jury has been selected and sworn
cited Cited as authority (rule) David Stephens v. Larry Norris
8th Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
Id. at 920.
discussed Cited "see" Darling v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ott v. State, 325 Md. 206, 215 , 600 A.2d 111 (“[A]n officer may make an arrest on the strength of a warrant, the existence of which has been certified to him by other officers in his depart *451 ment[.]”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 904 , 113 S.Ct. 295 , 121 L.Ed.2d 219 (1992).
cited Cited "see" Maurice Anderson v. John King
8th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cokeley v. Lockhart, 951 F.2d 916, 918 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 904 , 113 S.Ct. 296 , 121 L.Ed.2d 220 (1992).
cited Cited "see" Joseph Lee v. James Gammon, Superintendent, and Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, State of Missouri
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cokeley v. Lockhart, 951 F.2d 916, 918-19 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 904 , 113 S.Ct. 296 , 121 L.Ed.2d 220 (1992).
cited Cited "see" Joseph Lee v. James Gammon
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cokeley v. Lockhart, 951 F.2d 916, 918-19 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 904 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Forman
E.D. Mich. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Jenkins, 902 F.2d 459, 463 (6th Cir.1990) (“Application of the collateral es-toppel doctrine is premised on the assumption that the jury acted rationally and found certain facts in reaching its verdict.”) See also, Pettaway v. Plummer, 943 F.2d 1041, 1048 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 904 , 113 S.Ct. 296 , 121 L.Ed.2d 220 (1992) (giving estoppel effect to a prior jury determination “where it is clear that there was not simply an inconsistent verdict in the first trial”); Hess v. Medlock, 820 F.2d 1368, 1374 (4th Cir.1987) (denying estoppel effect, because…
discussed Cited "see" Gadson v. State
Md. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ott v. State, 325 Md. 206, 225 , 600 A.2d 111, 120 (noting that physical evidence obtained as the result of an illegal seizure is suppressed under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine), cert. denied, Maryland v. Ott, 506 U.S. 904 , 113 S.Ct. 295 , 121 L.Ed.2d 219 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Conefrey
Mass. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See and compare United States v. Hager, 969 F.2d 883, 891 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 904 (1992) (general unanimity instruc tian sufficient where evidence “not so complex that there was a genuine possibility of juror confusion”); United States v. Sayan, 968 F.2d 55, 65 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Boulware v. Marshall
C.D. Cal. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Boardman v. Estelle, 957 F.2d 1523, 1525 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 904 , 113 S.Ct. 297 , 121 L.Ed.2d 221 (1992). 5 . 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). 6 . 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). 7 . 549 U.S. 270 , 127 S.Ct 856 , 166 L.Ed.2d 856 (2007). 8 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kepiro, 06ap-1302 (9-6-2007)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Cokeley v. Lockhart (C.A.8, 1991), 951 F.2d 916 , certiorari denied, 506 U.S. 904 , 113 S.Ct. 296 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stokes v. State
Md. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 , 83 S.Ct. 407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963) (initiating the doctrine that derivative evidence gained from the illegal actions of police must also be suppressed as fruits of the poisonous tree); see also Ott v. State, 325 Md. 206 , 600 A.2d 111 (1992) (noting that physical evidence obtained as the result of an illegal seizure is suppressed under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine), cert. denied, Maryland v. Ott, 506 U.S. 904 , 113 S.Ct. 295 , 121 L.Ed.2d 219 (1992). 4 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Simpson v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1998 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Ott v. State, 325 Md. 206, 224-26 , 600 A.2d 111 (defendant had standing to contest a search incident to an unlawful arrest), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 904 , 113 S.Ct. 295 , 121 L.Ed.2d 219 (1992); In re Albert S., 106 Md.App. 376, 384-86 , 664 A.2d 476 (1995)(defendant had standing to challenge a search incident to an unlawful seizure of his person). 6.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gonzalo De Jesus Tamayo
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moreover, Tamayo did not request to allocute at his resentencing, and he did not object to not being given the opportunity to do so. 8 “Where the district court has offered the opportunity to object and a party is silent or fails to state the grounds for objection, objections to the sentence will be waived for purposes of appeal, and this court will not entertain an appeal based upon such objections unless refusal to do so would result in manifest injustice.” United States v. Jones, 899 F.2d 1097, 1103 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 906, 111 S.Ct. 275 , 112 L.Ed.2d 230 (1990), overrul…
Maryland
v.
Ott
No. 91-1503.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
506 U.S. 904
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

Ct. App. Md. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari denied.