green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Board of Education of the Palestine-Wheatley School District
Dist. # 1, 56 F.3d 904 , 914 (8th Cir. 1995); accord Lorain NAACP v. Lorain Bd. of Educ., 979 F.2d 1141 , 1149 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 905 , 113 S.Ct. 2998 , 125 L.Ed.2d 691 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Hallmark v. Cohen & Slamowitz
See In re Six Grand Jury Witnesses, 979 F.2d 939 , 943-44 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied sub nom., XYZ Corp. v. United States, 509 U.S. 905 , 113 S.Ct. 2997 , 125 L.Ed.2d 691 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karlsberg v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
Lastly, petitioner contends that the Tribunal’s determination violated her equal protection rights. * “[T]he equal protection clause does not prevent State Legislatures from drawing lines that treat one class of individuals or entities differently from others unless the difference in treatment is palpably arbitrary or amounts to an invidious discrimination” (Trump v Chu, 65 NY2d 20 , 25 [1985], appeal dismissed 474 US 915 [1985] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Brady v State of New York, 80 NY2d 596, 604-605 [1992], cert denied 509 US 905 [1993]; Matter of Long Is.
cited
Cited "see"
Lingua v. Schering-Plough Corp.
See In re Six Grand Jury Witnesses, 979 F.2d 939 , 944 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 905 , 113 S.Ct. 2997 , 125 L.Ed.2d 691 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Everett Hadix, C. Pepper Moore v. Perry Johnson
See Lorain NAACP v. Lorain Bd. of Educ., 979 F.2d 1141 , 1153 (6th Cir.1992) (holding that an increase of one party’s “financial obligations under the consent decree beyond [the agreed-upon amount] constitutes an abuse of discretion and cannot stand”), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 905 , 113 S.Ct. 2998 , 125 L.Ed.2d 691 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walters v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission
See Brady v. State, 80 N.Y.2d 596 , 592 N.Y.S.2d 955, 958 , 607 N.E.2d 1060,1063 (Ct.App.1992), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 905 , 113 5.Ct. 2998, 125 L.Ed.2d 692 (1993); cf., Maxwell v. Bugbee, 250 U.S. 525, 539 , 40 S.Ct. 2, 6 , 63 L.Ed. 1124 (1919) (inclusion of entire estate of decedent to calculate inheritance tax rate for property in New Jersey “is in no just sense a tax upon the foreign property.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walters v. STATE EX REL., TAX COM'N
See Brady v. State, 80 N.Y.2d 596 , 592 N.Y.S.2d 955, 958 , 607 N.E.2d 1060, 1063 (Ct.App.1992), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 905 , 113 S.Ct. 2998 , 125 L.Ed.2d 692 (1993); cf., Maxwell v. Bugbee, 250 U.S. 525, 539 , 40 S.Ct. 2, 6 , 63 L.Ed. 1124 (1919) (inclusion of entire estate of decedent to calculate inheritance tax rate for property in New Jersey "is in no just sense a tax upon the foreign property.").
discussed
Cited "see"
Capital Financial Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxation & Finance
We agree with respondents, however, that petitioner has failed to satisfy its heavy burden of demonstrating the unconstitutionality of Tax Law § 210 (17) (former [b]), as amended by Laws of 1986 (ch 638, § 3; see, Brady v State of New York, 80 NY2d 596, 602 , cert denied 509 US 905 , 113 S Ct 2998 ; 41 Kew Gardens Rd.
discussed
Cited "see"
Saavedra v. City of Albuquerque
See Jackson v. Gates, 975 F.2d 648, 652-53 (9th Cir.1992) (to comply with the Fourth Amendment, compelled drug testing must be either based on “articulable, individualized” reasons or as a result of a purely random selection process), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 905 , 113 S.Ct. 2996 , 125 L.Ed.2d 690 (1993); Ford v. Dowd, 931 F.2d 1286, 1292 (8th Cir.1991) (“[I]n the absence of uniform or systematic random selection of employees subject to drug testing, we will allow the Government to enforce drug testing where employees are chosen ‘only on the basis of a reasonable suspicion.’” (emphas…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernbach v. Timex Corp.
See, e.g., In re Six Grand Jury Witnesses, 979 F.2d 939 , 944 (2d Cir.1992) (“the cloak of privilege simply protects the communication from discovery, the underlying information contained in the communication is not shielded from discovery”), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 905 , 113 S.Ct. 2997 , 125 L.Ed.2d 691 (1993).
Winkleman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-1661.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1993.
509 U.S. 905
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.