discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mark James Dahlman (2×) See United States v. Thompson, 976 F.2d 666, 673 (11th Cir.1992) (concluding that in light of subsequent amendments, Streeter was no longer persuasive), cert. denied sub nom Howard v. United States, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 3010 , 125 L.Ed.2d 701 (1993).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Frank Kendrick, III Compare United States v. Mogel, 956 F.2d 1555, 1561-66 (11th Cir.) (discussing nature of court’s discretion vis-a-vis departures), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 167 , 121 L.Ed.2d 115 (1992) with United States v. Thompson, 976 F.2d 666, 673 (11th Cir.1992) (“sentencing court has discretion to deny downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility”), cer t. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 3010 , 125 L.Ed.2d 701 (1993).