green
Positive treatment
27.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Valencia Gonzalez v. Moran
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 19 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 20 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 21 44 U.S. Constitution amend.
discussed
Cited "see"
Moreno Fraijo v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Medina v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Diaz-Godinez v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jayed v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Garcia v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Martinez v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Leyva Morales v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Escalera Maldonado v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Zavala Figueroa v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Brito v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Pamatz Valencia v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Flores Limon v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rojas v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Camacho Carrillo v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramirez Rivera v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Zamudio Leon v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Castrejon v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bravo v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Calderon v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Pineda Ramos v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Barajas Galvan v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cancino Valdovinos v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Chavez Mellin v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Soto v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Reyna v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ibarra Diaz v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Perez Hernandez v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Montes v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Vera Esquivel v. Miller
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in both sentences of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). 1 process, the I-601A applications, such as decisions as to staffing and appl…
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 2006
See Specter v. Garrett, 971 F.2d 936, 942-43, 955-56 (3d Cir.1992), vacated on other grounds by 506 U.S. 969 , 113 S.Ct. 455 , 121 L.Ed.2d 364 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Gross v. German Foundation Industrial Initiative
See Specter v. Garrett, 971 F.2d 936, 942-43, 955-56 (3d Cir.1992), vacated on other grounds by 506 U.S. 969 , 113 S.Ct. 455 , 121 L.Ed.2d 364 (1992).
examined
Cited "see"
Dipace v. Goord
(3×)
While disclosure of otherwise privileged material to a non-governmental recipient may result in a waiver, no waiver will be found unless that disclosure was “authorized” by the governmental agency and “voluntary.” See City of Virginia Beach v. United States Dep’t of Commerce, 995 F.2d 1247, 1253 (4th Cir.1993); accord Fla. House of Representatives v. United States Dep’t of Commerce, 961 F.2d 941, 946 (11th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 969 , 113 S.Ct. 446 , 121 L.Ed.2d 363 (1992); Shell Oil Co., 772 F.Supp. at 209 ; Peck v. United States, 514 F.Supp. 210, 212 (S.D.N.Y.1981); see…
examined
Cited "see"
Myron v. Doctors General Hospital, Ltd.
(3×)
See Florida House of Representatives v. United States Dep’t of Commerce, 961 F.2d 941, 946 (11th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 969 , 113 S.Ct. 446 , 121 L.Ed.2d 363 (1992).
examined
Cited "see"
Myron Ex Rel. Brock v. DOCTORS GENERAL HOSP.
(3×)
See Florida House of Representatives v. United States Dep't of Commerce, 961 F.2d 941, 946 (11th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 969 , 113 S.Ct. 446 , 121 L.Ed.2d 363 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lopez
See Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 (9th Cir.1991) (purpose of § 1252(f) is to reduce need for incarcerating criminal aliens after service of their sentence), vacated as moot sub nom Sivley v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 , 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 364 (1992).
Florida House of Representatives
v.
United States Department of Commerce
v.
United States Department of Commerce
No. 92-583.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1992.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.