green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. National Westminster Bank USA (In Re Q-C Circuits Corp.)
(2×)
See In re Investment Bankers, Inc., 4 F.3d 1556 , 1566 (10th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1061 , 127 L.Ed.2d 381 (1994); In re Southland & Keystone, 132 B.R. 632 (9th Cir. BAP 1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Butler v. Loomer (In Re Loomer)
(2×)
See In re Investment Bankers, Inc., 4 F.3d 1556 , 1566 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1061 , 127 L.Ed.2d 381 (1994); In re Bellanca Aircraft Corp., 850 F.2d 1275 (8th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zahn v. Yucaipa Capital Fund (In Re Almac's, Inc.)
(2×)
See In re Investment Bankers, Inc., 4 F.3d 1556 , 1561 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, Davis, Gillenwater & Lynch v. Turner, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1061 , 127 L.Ed.2d 381 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pereira v. Private Brands, Inc. (In Re Harvard Knitwear, Inc.)
(2×)
See Turner v. Davis, Gillenwater & Lynch (In re Investment Bankers, Inc.), 4 F.3d 1556 , 1566 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1061 , 127 L.Ed.2d 381 (1994); Bucki v. Singleton (In re Cardon Realty Corp.), 146 B.R. 72, 81 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.1992); Yoder v. T.E.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzales
(2×)
Public Citizen v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 491 U.S. 440, 454-55 , 109 S.Ct. 2558, 2567 , 105 L.Ed.2d 377 (1989) (citations omitted); accord In re Investment Bankers, Inc., 4 F.3d 1556 , 1564 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1061 , 127 L.Ed.2d 381 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Miguel Gonzales, United States of America v. Orlenis Hernandez-Diaz, United States of America v. Luis Leon, United States of America v. Mario Perez
(2×)
Looking beyond the naked text for guidance is perfectly proper when the result it apparently decrees is difficult to fathom or where it seems inconsistent with Congress' intention. 22 Public Citizen v. United States Dep't of Justice, 491 U.S. 440, 454-55 , 109 S.Ct. 2558, 2567 , 105 L.Ed.2d 377 (1989) (citations omitted); accord In re Investment Bankers, Inc., 4 F.3d 1556 , 1564 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1061 , 127 L.Ed.2d 381 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
F.D.I.C. v. Keller
See In re Investment Bankers, Inc., 4 F.3d 1556 , 1565-66 (10th Cir.1993) (disgorgement of fees is available where attorney did not make complete disclosure under Sec. 329), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1061 (1994); In re Scoggins, 142 B.R. 940, 943 (Bankr.D.Or.1992) (review of fees may require disgorgement of interim payments). 12 We thus decline to review the allowance of interim fees in this case, even though it comes in the guise of a modification of a preliminary injunction, which is generally appealable under 28 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manson v. Wheelabrator Spokane, Inc.
(2×)
Chelan County, 109 Wash.2d at 300-01 , 745 P.2d 1 ; see also Pope v. Univ. of Wash., 121 Wash.2d 479, 490 , 852 P.2d 1055 , (1993) (ordinarily, the issue of whether an employer acts willfully for purposes of RCW 49.52.070 is a question of fact), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1115 , 114 S.Ct. 1061 , 127 L.Ed.2d 381 (1994). 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Cheshier & Fuller, L.L.P. (In Re Sunpoint Securities, Inc.)
(2×)
See, e.g., Turner v. Davis, Gillenwater & Lynch (In re Investment Bankers, Inc.), 4 F.3d 1556, 1564 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1061 , 127 L.Ed.2d 381 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keenan v. Allan
(2×)
See, e.g., Pope v. University of Washington, 121 Wash.2d 479, 482 , 852 P.2d 1055 (1993), and cases cited therein at 489-90, 852 P.2d 1055 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1061 , 127 L.Ed.2d 381 , and corrected, 871 P.2d 590 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DAVIS, GILLENWATER & LYNCH and Gilbert K. Davis
v.
James H. TURNER, Trustee
v.
James H. TURNER, Trustee
No. 93-956.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1994.
Cited by 46 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.